Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
189,284
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

News & Issues > Three in a Row!
 

Three in a Row!

Call me "Martin, Jr.". I'm writing 3 posts in 3 days! I just have a lot to comment on suddenly. And when (if) the weather ever improves, I won't have as much time sitting in front of the computer.

Today's topic is to relate a couple of today's newspaper articles to each other.

U.N. population "experts" (however defined) predict the earth will contain over 10 billion people by 2100. That's 3 billion more than today. They say "most of the increase is expected from the world's 'high-fertility countries', especially in sub-Saharan Africa." I say, something has to be done about this, no matter where it happens.

I have my ideas on what to do, perhaps not exactly humane. Carrot row metaphor: It hurts, but when I plant a row of carrots, I have to pluck out about every other one, especially the weakest, to allow the "fittest" to grow. I guess I'm helping "natural selection" do its thing. It's not easy to do but is necessary. Bite into that.

More "authorities" are saying that by 2100 (again), the oceans will rise anywhere from 3 to 5 feet, dramatically higher than earlier projections. Global warming, of course, is the cause. We all know the regions likely to be affected (swamped). Sorry Dottie, Teal, Martin. Of course, that's 90 years away, but time flies. And don't move to Bangladesh!

So the connection is: more people+ less land= problems, right here in River City. Starts with P, rhymes with T, and that stands for trouble. (Kristi is too young to remember that "Music Man" song.)

Okay, bin Laden is dead. Let's move on to more pressing problems. Like saving the earth!

posted on May 4, 2011 6:23 AM ()

Comments:

Eugenics? I agree in theory, but.... the whole human rights thing makes it messy.
What happened to Africa being decimated by AIDS, ebola, lassa fever?
comment by crazylife on May 6, 2011 9:59 PM ()
Yeah, that's the word! I suppose if you have 10 children, lose half, you still have 3 too many.
reply by solitaire on May 7, 2011 4:58 AM ()
I think that educating males so that they only get a sense of worth from
how many children they produce is key. I don't like to think we are solving
population growth by starving children. As a woman, I thought pregnancy and childbirth
was a little trip to hell and if a man had to do this there would not ever
be another child born. However, once the baby came, I was flooded with
a primitive and protective love and amnesia about pregnancy and childbirth
kicked in. I am not at all against early abortion and if circumstances
indicate the hopelessness of a situation, then I think it should be done.
comment by elderjane on May 6, 2011 6:25 AM ()
Right on. After having 4 of my own, I did my part--vasectomy. I was 41, too old to be a parent. I'm still on the fence regarding abortions. Two sides.
reply by solitaire on May 7, 2011 4:56 AM ()
And the stupid Republicans want us to stop funding family planning in Africa. They are such idiots.
comment by redimpala on May 5, 2011 9:24 PM ()
Another check in the thumbs down column for Repubs.
reply by solitaire on May 6, 2011 4:46 AM ()
Re. the dowry issue in India resulting in female children being aborted: I can't respect a tradition that says save the custom but not the children. Wouldn't it be saner and more humane to just stop the dowry custom? Expecting fathers of female children to pay large sums to get their girls married is barbaric. Never mind carrot picking. Just educate and insist on birth control and you will rarely need abortion.
comment by tealstar on May 5, 2011 8:13 AM ()
Agreed!
reply by solitaire on May 6, 2011 4:45 AM ()
Ah but I write my blogs for you! What else do you have to fill your day but to pick on carrots?
I am definitely not good in personal commitments which is why I choose to live alone 30 years ago--now commitments like blogging, stop smoking, no drinking, etc., I am great at.
The only blogs you are allowed NOT to read are the few C & P I do!
comment by greatmartin on May 5, 2011 7:57 AM ()
You finally succeeded in appalling me, but then I had to remember a comment I made many years ago when talking about childhood sexual abuse: I said sexual abuse is so devastating that it would almost be kinder to take the child victims and shoot them to spare them a life of pain and to prevent the abuse of more children. (Most predators were themselves abused as children.) I was trying to make a point about how devastating child sexual abuse can be, but it sounds as callous as your carrot metaphor.
I wonder- did those calculations take into account loss of life due to disease, war and natural disasters? Probably not. I think we are both callous!
comment by dragonflyby on May 4, 2011 10:29 PM ()
I never intended to be so "callous" as you put it. I'm just saying that some deaths are necessary. As I said in my comment to John below, while I'm opposed to indiscriminate abortions, in the long run, they might be good for checking out-of-control birth rates. Of course, education is better (see reply to Marta). Sometimes you have to be bold, therefore callous, in decision making.
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:40 AM ()
My late husband used to say that I'd learn to swim when the boat is sinking (I was in that young stage of fancy free living). I have said it here: we are living in the last best time. None of us will be here in 90 years. I don't envy those who have to face hard choices or live in the middle of a Mad Max movie for real.
comment by tealstar on May 4, 2011 12:36 PM ()
Yes, I'm going to miss being alive when I'm dead. These ARE good times. I think being globally connected helps us understand our (world) problems, both socially and physically. Stay dry.
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:33 AM ()
Saving the earth. YAY! Let's do it. But yeah, all of us can do our part to help out. I am glad you are posting a lot. It's nice to read! Well, this one is kinda depressing, but I guess I am glad I don't have kids to worry about in the future!
comment by kristilyn3 on May 4, 2011 11:57 AM ()
I have to philosophize and expound on my theories every once in awhile. I could post something everyday if I really tried. Thanks for the encouragement. I don't have many followers, but the few I do are loyal.
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:29 AM ()
Oh boy, Randy....that is a very sensitive subject. Who will get to pick & choose? Maybe the next generation will come up with the answer, ours certainly has not been able to solve the problem.
comment by gapeach on May 4, 2011 11:54 AM ()
Over population is a "very sensitive subject"? Hmmm. Of course, by my having 4 children, I didn't do my part. But so far, they only have produced 3 more humans.
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:26 AM ()
I got my water wings to swim up to Indiana--I know a guy who grows fruits and vegetables there.

PS When I started blogging I made a commitment to post one blog a day and I have for 6 years--I am thinking of cutting back and then who will you pick on?
comment by greatmartin on May 4, 2011 9:11 AM ()
And I learned 5 years ago never to make a commitment!
Actually, it's been much longer than that--I've de-commited twice on marriage. Just don't expect me to read each and every one of your blogs.
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:23 AM ()
There are a number of quality health aid organizations working to teach family planning in Africa and the Middle East. Many cultural traditions impede progress on this issue (more kids the better, a male dominated perspective in the developing world). Such male society traditions are rigidly against birth control, but the women seem to be catching on. Let's hope so.
comment by marta on May 4, 2011 8:57 AM ()
On paper, education is usually the right approach to solving many problems. However, as we all know, many individuals and cultures don't seem to get the message. If we still have people saying "we was", how can we expect them to understand having 10 children is unacceptable in today's world?
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:20 AM ()
Carrot-plucking is so politically incorrect that it will never fly no matter how many people starve. I can remember as a kid in Catholic School: "give money to feed the starving children in Africa". So, we did, and guess what happened? They grew up and produced more starving children. Logic anyone?
comment by jjoohhnn on May 4, 2011 7:06 AM ()
India is being "selective" in that baby girls are being aborted at extremely high rates. But that's because of the non-affordable dowry issue.
reply by solitaire on May 5, 2011 5:14 AM ()
Feed the starving children and teach them birth control, and educate them. Give them something to live for besides children.
reply by tealstar on May 4, 2011 12:26 PM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]