Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
191,382
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

21 hours ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

News & Issues > Right to Work--in Indiana
 

Right to Work--in Indiana

Being a member of the teacher's union all my life, my sympathies are with the Democrats in Indiana's state legislature.
Last year, they abandoned the whole state. This year, thus far, they've simply been no shows at the state house. Reason? Our state's "right to work" bill is on the agenda. It's guaranteed to pass with Republicans holding a 60-40 majority in the House and a 37 to 13 edge in the Senate. The only recourse is for the Dems to walk out.

Republicans claim (falsely) the bill is good for jobs (coming to Ind.). Of course, it's politics and money. Union busting favors Republicans because unions back Democrats with votes and money.

"Weaken the enemy" is the unwritten policy of the GOP. The enemy here being both Democrats and the unions that back them. They (Rep) don't give a rat's ass about worker wages. "Right to work" means that blue collar workers are not obligated to join the union. Everyone--members or non-- benefits from negotiations and settlements. That hardly seems fair, but opponents claim no worker should be forced to join. It's an age old predicament.

But the bottom line is politics (money and power, not to mention prestige). That's always been the "method behind its madness" of the Republican party. Corporate America rules because the Republicans are in their pockets. The backlashes and revolts by the 99 percenters are just starting. We ain't seen nothing yet. Hang on.

posted on Jan 9, 2012 5:55 AM ()

Comments:

"Right to work" usually means right to fire- with or without cause or consequences.
comment by dragonflyby on Jan 19, 2012 5:55 PM ()
At this point in time, I too am strong for unions. Did you know that regular players in the NFL are now part of the AFL-CIO?
comment by drmaus on Jan 10, 2012 7:32 PM ()
Didn't your congresspeople come over the border to IL last year along with the ones from WI? So it is still going on, I see.
comment by boots586 on Jan 10, 2012 3:32 PM ()
Yes, indeed. They took (and are taking) a lot of heat (from Repubs.) for "skipping out on their job". I think they went back to the state house today.
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 6:38 PM ()
I am sure for some it is true. I hope you did not misunderstand my comment. I really wasn't bashing, simply giving my perspective in my work force as I see it.
comment by hennaladykim on Jan 10, 2012 2:44 PM ()
Without labor unions your children would still be working in the mines and the textile mills instead of being in school.
comment by jondude on Jan 10, 2012 2:32 PM ()
This is something no need for me to worry about.Let them do the worry and why bother.
Don't worry about the grandchildren in the near future,they will have to deal with this.
In the meantime.I am outta here.
comment by fredo on Jan 9, 2012 9:39 AM ()
When I get as old as you are, Fredo, I'll quit worrying about such issues myself! But really, it's not a good philosophy to "let others (including grandchildren) do something about it". We really need to care.
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:40 AM ()
I am the lone democrat, crying in the republican wilderness.
comment by elderjane on Jan 9, 2012 9:19 AM ()
Lone, as in your area? Join the club. I'm just glad we have each other here in mybloggersville. It's like preaching to the choir, but it's a good stress reliever!
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:36 AM ()
As I commented to Teal, balance and compromise has always been the foundation of positive agreements. Unions have been a valuable part of this country since the founding. But the current Republicans are so inflexible as to make workable negotiations impossible. And the Tea Party Taliban is utterly frozen in concrete ideology, with no consideration or respect for other people's rights and points of view. We have the same issue fight in Ohio. Fasten your seat belt.
comment by marta on Jan 9, 2012 8:31 AM ()
Ignore the "other reply". It was meant for hennaladykim. As for my comment to you, I say true! These stalemates are getting ugly.
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:34 AM ()
Well, unions aren't the total solution. They can cause a company to go out of business with unrealistic wage demands, etc. Sometimes they get out of hand. But overall, they're beneficial to the average working stiff.
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:29 AM ()
I have mixed views on Unions in general. My Dad was a Union gut back in the day and benefited from it often. I on the other hand as a care giver get no protection for job security, or breaks either one. I have no great Genie in there making sure I get a 40 hour work week or even a 2 week notice. I am forced to pay the dues as the state signs my check whether I want to or not. It does not matter where you are I guess, they get their hands in your pockets.
comment by hennaladykim on Jan 9, 2012 8:23 AM ()
I don't know what happened, but my reply went under Marta's comment, starting with "Well, unions....
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:30 AM ()
I remember being "forced" to be in a union that took it's dues but I never needed it. I didn't have an issue with that tho. My brother is in a union though so he often let's the family know how important they are...
comment by kristilyn3 on Jan 9, 2012 6:54 AM ()
Of course, the whole idea behind unions is "force in numbers". We need more "Norma Rae's"!
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:25 AM ()
Unions undermined themselves at one point when they became as manipulative as large corporations. But I have always asked people to remember that without them we wouldn't have the 35-40 hour work week, mandated breaks, decent lunch periods, paid vacations, and a minimum wage. There has to be a balance between the powers. Workers too can demand too much, but not in this case. I can only hope the Democrats can keep throwing in the monkey wrench that will make this bill fail.
comment by tealstar on Jan 9, 2012 6:17 AM ()
Plus, politicians (Repubs) like to show "who's boss". They're not about to allow some low-life blue collar leader push them around. On and on it goes--t'was ever thus.
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:24 AM ()
Well said, T. I agree. Balance and compromise has always been the foundation of positive agreements. But the current Republicans are so inflexible as to make workable negotiations impossible.
reply by marta on Jan 9, 2012 8:25 AM ()
The Republican-Corporate love affair is odd because the markets and the economy do better historically under Democrat presidents.
comment by jondude on Jan 9, 2012 6:15 AM ()
Go figure.
reply by solitaire on Jan 10, 2012 5:20 AM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]