Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
189,152
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

Education > End-of Course Assessment Tests
 

End-of Course Assessment Tests

I don't know about other states, but Indiana is in the process of replacing the high school Graduation Qualifying Exam with End-of Course Assessment (tests). The ECA test will have to be mastered by students who intend to graduate and go on to college.

There are three separate ECA tests; algebra, English, and biology. This is much more specific than the GQE. I'm not sure at what grade level the tests are taken, nor do I know when they were taken. I do know the results (from the newspaper) of my county and surrounding counties.

The scores are based on pass/fail (and pass-plus). Quite frankly, in my opinion, the results are alarming. In my old high school (where I graduated, but taught at the Middle School), 52% passed algebra, 58% passed English, and only 24% passed biology. The state average was 61, 63, and 37% respectively. Read again the last sentence of the first paragraph. I think some students are going to have to reconsider their plans.

In the district I live, where my kids went to school, scores were not great, but mostly better than average (69, 70, 34)
Other districts varied greatly, but for the most part, the results were abyssmal.

Now the blame game begins. 1) Lack of student incentive? I would think they would want to be fully prepared to do their best. 2) Teacher ineffectiveness? Perhaps, but when I taught, I thought teachers were very conscientious, working very hard to educate their students. 3) Curriculum and text books? While I had (have) my doubts about certain areas of curricula, for the most part, I think it's on the right track. I do, however, fault text books. I was seldom satisfied with the science books we had to choose from, and the best of the lot left much to be desired. (In the last science book I used, the word "evolution" was never mentioned--like it was a curse word!) And 4) Teaching methods? Do students still dissect frogs, or do they use computer simulations? It's the age of the internet--high tech stuff, but what about the old fashion lab work (biology)? Is the computer anything more than a glorified textbook? I really don't know, being out of education for 12 years.

Whatever the cause (and I could have added a #5, parents?), test scores/results are not good. And it's not good for America. Where are we headed?

posted on Oct 22, 2010 6:02 AM ()

Comments:

Human remembers hearing on TV when she was in college, shortly before the Flood, that the end consumer to which the public schools should target their "product" was the business community. Do industrial drones really need art and geography and natural science? Do they even need to read beyond a bare minimum? No, I'm not advocating this mindset, but hasn't the attitude had its effect?
comment by zillahkatt on Nov 22, 2010 1:13 PM ()
One more thing. I think it's essential that the means of funding schools is changed, moving away from property taxes and toward sales taxes. The whole community must rally in support of schools and the financial support must be equally shared. That is true for roads, infrastructure, city services. Everyone has an investment in community services.
comment by marta on Nov 8, 2010 6:38 PM ()
Very troubling indeed, Randy. Here in Toledo, our public schools are failing miserably. The school levy went down to defeat for the third straight time, as did most of the area and regional schools, with the exception of my village school alma mater, rated tops in the state and known for long-standing excellence going back generations. It is an affluent village, but the support for its schools is unfailing even in a difficult economy. Parents are very involved in all facets of the schools and committed to excellence. But I don't see much of that in our city schools. Everything — scores, motivation, parental involvement — seems to be sinking. Our newspaper did a feature investigation recently on one city high school. It was dismal. Education is so important for the future of this country, and people don't seem to care. Very troubling.
comment by marta on Nov 8, 2010 6:33 PM ()
Randy, Kids may know how to use technology but can they invent and build it? For that, they need science.
comment by tealstar on Oct 24, 2010 12:54 PM ()
These are tests to determine if you pass/fail high school?
Very different from how it's done here.
I can't imagine only 24% passing biology. I found biology one of the more difficult classes in HS, but I still managed a grade of 80%+ in Bio30.
comment by crazylife on Oct 23, 2010 9:22 PM ()
No. It's just an assessment of how qualified or ready one is for college. Kids can make decent grades in high school (let's say biology), but really haven't learned much. This all goes back to the days where high school graduates couldn't read! People wondered how they ever got through school. Truly amazing!
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 6:00 AM ()
I don't think dissecting frogs is required anymore - a lot of kids can opt out which - as a veg head - I love. But I do agree that we seem to be getting stupider and stupider as a nation which is down right scary...
comment by kristilyn3 on Oct 23, 2010 8:32 AM ()
And one doesn't have to look far to see this--Palin and O'Donnell, for example.
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:57 AM ()
I think there is more than one factor -- technical distractions that are emotionally seductive like the internet and TV and texting and computer games play a part in desensitizing young people from brain activity. I think they are unmotivated. I think they are allowed to direct their own interests to their disadvantage, I think teachers come from the same mind set because they too are young and have been brought up the same way and don't see the problem. For all these reasons we have dumbed down. I think we should study schools in Japan and China. These kids are outshining ours. Permissiveness of the kind that is epidemic here does not exist in China, for instance. There, I've said it.
comment by tealstar on Oct 22, 2010 8:30 PM ()
I considered adding that (#6) to my list. No doubt, it's a contributing factor. I'm lucky my own children got through before it became popular. I had enough trouble with television! Kids, nowadays may not know biology, but they certainly are techno-savey!
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:55 AM ()
I always thought the life sciences like biology were the most fascinating
and I find it hard to see why so many kids fail at it. It does require
committing information to memory but my oldest grandaughter had a lot of
trouble with it. Problems in genetics especially fascinated me. I had a
good teacher and perhaps that is one of the keys. In my school experience
children had self control and they could all read and balance a checkbook.
Is that too much to ask now? I liked Laura's take on this.
comment by elderjane on Oct 22, 2010 7:58 PM ()
Well, it does help to be interested in a subject. If history is boring, you really don't have an incentive to work hard at it. That reminds me of an old Andy Griffith episode where Opie and his friends "dropped out" of their history lessons, until Andy sparked them with exciting stories, like "the shot heard 'round the world". Wow--a shot heard 'round the world?? Tell us more!
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:51 AM ()
I don't believe that we have anything like that here but then, I've been out of school for a long time and my girls are still years away from high school. It's easy to blame technology just as it's easy to blame teachers and parents, alike. But it's likely a combination of things, I suppose. I do find, in my limited experience, that the quality of teaching is diminishing as the standards keep rising. My oldest daughter studies things in fourth grade that I didn't start learning until fifth or sixth and yet...her teacher is far more concernced with her own allergies and making her class "scent free" for her comfort (I'm biased here because I can't help but wonder why the heck she's teaching in a public school if her allergies are that bad) then discussing with me my daughter's progress. On the flip side, my middle daughter has a teacher that I remember from my own days in elementary school and has been doing so much better than previous years. But again...I have limited experience and I'm the mom which complicates/biases my opinion.Albert Einstein said, "imagination is more important than knowledge". I also tend to think that the complete lack of creative time in school isn't helping anything. But I should save this long winded comment for my own blog.
comment by juliansmom on Oct 22, 2010 6:05 PM ()
Every teacher has his or her own agenda and method. I wasn't too critical when my kids were going to school. I just wanted them (my kids) to do their best, despite the subject or teacher. It paid off in the end.
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:46 AM ()
I get the feeling that the current attitude is who needs the natural sciences when making lots of money is all about using technology to come up with some way to get rich quick. Subjects like geography and art have already fallen off the sled. And included in that enabling technology is using it for winning lotto or becoming some kind of media darling whether from acting, singing, or sports. Movies and TV have taught the younger generations that riches and fame come out of the blue and hard work is not involved.
comment by troutbend on Oct 22, 2010 8:23 AM ()
Good point. We focus on the famous, don't we? How many hundreds of thousands kids try out for American Idol? Shortcut to fame is their mantra.
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:41 AM ()
We have the FATC or is it FACT or TFAC-in any case EVERYTHING regading schools from the pupils to teachers to to the mortor on the building are judgd by the result!
In any case I blame the downfall of our education system from the time they started the 'new math' for the dire results in leaning ever since--I saw nothing wrong with learning by rote and 1+1 did equal 2!!!
comment by greatmartin on Oct 22, 2010 8:14 AM ()
It's always the "bottom line". Like the TV ad: "Show me the Carfax".
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:37 AM ()
I don't know how different that is from past years- if you take the past 50 years and longer into account. We had a brief swell when more than 25% of the total population attended college (of course, fewer graduated) and an even shorter peak when more than 3% of the population attended/ completed graduate school.These statistics were inflated over previous years (decades) by the "Baby Boomers",which makes us history's chronic over-achievers. Let's be honest- how many of our parents attended college? We want to believe that in this modern age one needs an education to survive, but I don't know that that is true either. Our advances in science and technology have always been achieved by a small fraction- probably the upper end of the curve.
comment by dragonflyby on Oct 22, 2010 7:51 AM ()
But why be satisfied with mediocraty? It's really not a matter of going to or graduating from college. It's what are kids learning in K-12 schools? It's little wonder that over half the adult population do not believe in evolution (for example) if they slept through basic biology course. Either that, or superstition trumps facts. College bound or not, there's no excuse for ignorance (learning disabilities excepted). Otherwise, I agree with your assessment.
reply by solitaire on Oct 24, 2010 5:34 AM ()
You make a good point. There are a lot of well educated people that are
self educated and have a life time commitment to learning new things.
reply by elderjane on Oct 22, 2010 8:03 PM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]