Teal

Profile

Username:
tealstar
Name:
Teal
Location:
Matlacha, FL
Birthday:
09/26
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Publishing

Stats

Post Reads:
292,699
Posts:
1116
Photos:
8
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

9 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Teal's Modest Adventures

Religion > Faith (Oh, That Again)
 

Faith (Oh, That Again)


I listened to an interview Terry Gross of NPR had with an assistant professor of religion at Boston University, an ordained American Baptist pastor, Jennifer Knust, who has just written a book analyzing the Bible and pointing out not only its discrepancies, but the contradictions within it from writer to writer. The book is “Unprotected Texts: The Bible’s Surprising Contradictions about Sex and Desire”.

I am a sketchy scholar and am only vaguely recalling some of the most telling points she made, but I came away with a sense of frustration that despite her intellect, she ignores the implications of what she has uncovered. Her premise is that those men who contributed books to the Bible were led by God and had only good intentions, by which I am guessing she is excusing their ignorance but accepting their moral purity.

I excuse their ignorance too because, after all they lived in a primitive time, but by the same token, I do not intend to live by their ignorance, that the devout attempt to do, and certainly try to make everyone else do as well. I also take exception to her conclusion that the authors of the Bible had only love and guidance from God to lead them and were not at all influenced by personal bias, and the jealousies of their very human condition. If this be true, it would be the only time in the history of mankind that such altruism held sway.

Furthermore, if men of God are mostly only doing “the best they can”, why do we have pedophiles, why did jealous priests burn Joan of Arc at the stake (she was upstaging them with her claim that God had spoken to her personally and that couldn’t be borne), and are we to believe that the priests of the Spanish Inquisition were just men of God “doing the best they could”? Why did the devout burn women in Salem, claiming they were witches when what they really wanted was their land and possessions?

Why is this author ignoring the conclusions an unbiased researcher might come to? My supposition is: When she was a child, her mother would read to her from the Bible every day. Together they would sit in a sunny chair and heads together would consider every single chapter and verse, discussing and memorizing and sharing the Bible and each other in a mother-daughter love that is all too rare. What a wonderful mother. And to this child that wonderful mother, with all good intentions, imparted to her child a vast fund of mythology.

She told Terry about that time: (I missed some sentences as I was typing fast while listening). “I grew up with the Bible ... We read every story … What I remember about that was how invitational, friendly, warm it was. We would come up with troubling questions and stories and we would talk about them. And in the process we would think about how God loves us ... and how we wanted to be in our own communities. The Bible remains infinitely fascinating and infinitely love giving and inspiring to me because I read it as a document produced by human beings who are doing the best that they can.”

I am guessing that on a deep level, the author feels that any repudiation of the Bible her intelligence might lead her to, feels like a betrayal of her mother. And she can’t bear that. So much for her scholarship.

And, finally, Jason Coker, on his website Blogs, Scripture and Theology, writes in part,

“One simply cannot take scripture seriously (as Knust puts it) and fail to notice that it often argues vigorously with itself. Historically, it’s the attempt to force scripture into a seamless and systematic convergence of unquestionable control that leads people to malign and maim others in the name of God.”

My own view, of course, is that faith is a convenience for many to excuse and support their basic agenda, whatever that might be, most often personal gain of some kind, self-aggrandizement, and ego-driven claims to speciality. “I believe and you don’t and that makes me special and gives me license to dictate how you should behave.

xx, Teal

posted on Mar 16, 2011 6:49 AM ()

Comments:

I'm a very spiritual person who focuses on love and kindness and self-actualization, with a more eastern than western spirituality, a long way from my Catholic roots. Nature is more my church building these days. But you have expressed my point of view about myopic hamstrung organized western Christianity very well. I am so thankful for my early college studies of comparative religions and humanities. I'm not into mind control, rooted in money raising and politics and organization preservation, and I see a lot of it in today's religion.
comment by marta on Mar 29, 2011 6:37 AM ()
Thank You. Your post inspired a blog I'm gonna write about meeting a preacher in the aisle of Wallymart.
comment by susil on Mar 26, 2011 12:03 PM ()
I'm looking forward to your post. Meanwhile in the checkout line at BJ's today a very heavy man with tattoos was wearing a T shirt that said we must allow ourselves to love God, and there was an arrow to the Promised Land, etc. I bit my tongue.
reply by tealstar on Mar 26, 2011 2:10 PM ()
The absolute cruelty of God is something I could not swallow. For one who
is supposed to be love personified there is a lot of vengeance and punishment contained in the Bible. The church has become a social club in
my opinion.
comment by elderjane on Mar 17, 2011 5:51 AM ()
Whether there is or is not a mystical entity, a vast consciousness of some kind at work does in a parallel universe does not explain nor support anything that has been done in the name of religion since man looked for explanations outside of himself. Religion is a device by which some people control others. At its best it encourages moral behavior and many times it fails in that too. At its worst it gives the pious a reason to persecute others. If you have good parents and good bio chemicals, you will gravitate to morality and you don't need something else to teach you compassion.
reply by tealstar on Mar 17, 2011 6:35 AM ()
A whole day has passed since you posted this, and nobody has responded? Of course, you're "preaching to a choir member" with me. So many children are "brainwashed" with Biblical platitudes and pictures, that it is impossible to set them straight. Reason doesn't apply. I was brought up by a believing mother. Science intervened, thankfully!
comment by solitaire on Mar 17, 2011 5:48 AM ()
Maybe my confreres are just weary of my fulminations?
reply by tealstar on Mar 17, 2011 6:31 AM ()

Comment on this article   


1,116 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]