In "the good old days", a teacher could get away with just about anything when it came to disciplining a student. "The paddle" was used by many, if not most, male teachers. While I rarely swatted a student (maybe 5 in 32 years), I've had female teachers ask me to spank one of theirs.
In recent years, paddling a student has become objectionable, even prohibited in most school districts. I'm in agreement with that policy. (I only used my paddle to belong to the "macho teacher club".) Not even the Principal can touch a student.
Well, last year, the Indiana General Assembly passed the Indiana Teacher Protection Act, which shields teachers from frivolous lawsuits filed over school discipline complaints.
In other words, if a teacher is sued for disciplining a student (paddling?)--and if the teacher's actions were reasonable under the school policy--then the teacher has legal immunity from the lawsuit. The Indiana attorney gerneral's office will step in and provide a legal defense for the teacher, at no cost.
Haven't we come a long way from the days where an unruly student "caught it" from both the teacher and father at home?! I'm not saying either way is better--to paddle or not (although I never liked the idea of beating on a kid). It just seems weird that a law needs passing to protect teachers from lawsuits.
I'll be curious to see if I read about any occurances this year. I'm glad I'm out of teaching.