Acronyms have been around for years. But with the advent of text and Twitter-language, we not only use it in writing, but now "speak" it with more frequency. Even Sarah Palin used WTF in a TV interview! (How long has "TV" been around?!) I heard Brian Williams on NBC world news say "snafu", an acronym from WWII, meaning "situation normal--all f***ed up". I reckon he didn't even think about the word's origin.
************************************************************
I was reminded yesterday that flossing teeth supposedly adds 6 years to your life. (That's good, because I do.)
I also read that "brisk walking is linked to better memory for seniors". (I do.) But that's not my reason for mentioning these two "secrets to longevity".
The connections, as with many health habits, seem to me somewhat of a "which came first, the chicken or the egg?"
conumbrum. Because some of us CAN walk, or are smart enough to know it's good for us, does THAT produce a longer, healthier life (or better memory)? In other words, does greater intelligence "cause" a longer life?
Or perhaps smarter people make more money, and hence, live better, therefore, live longer. I've seen many "scientific" studies that associate one thing to another. But I often question the variables ignored or omitted.
Descartes' famous "I think, therefore I am" theory seems to apply here, but in another sense. We, who are smart enough to know what's best for us, THINK about the right foods to eat, exercising, flossing (etc.). Consequently, we live a better life (barring unforseen catastrophes or diseases), because we know it prolongs life. Chicken or egg?
own housework but never exercised or walked unless she had to do so. She
lived to be 93 and 92 of those years she was perfectly clear and mentally
capable of doing anything she had to do.