Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
169,601
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

22 min ago
4 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

Politics & Legal > House Resolution
 

House Resolution

Not my house-- the House of Representatives (a misnomer, because they don't represent me).

I'm sure many of you noticed that "The House" recently approved a resolution reaffirming (!) "In God We Trust" as our national motto. What a crock. How hokey can they get?

The vote was 396 in favor, with 9 opposed--8 Democrats and 1 Republican (bravo!). The resolution moved on to the Senate --why?, I don't know.

My perspective (as if you didn't already know)? It's a hollow, devisive, unnecessary gesture, period. Secondly, it's exclusionary to those that don't have a monotheistic faith. That includes 16% of our non-religious populus, and 40 million Buddhists and Hindus (who do not recognize one god). The motto ignores and reinforces the outsider status of our nation's nonbelievers, as well as members of minority religions.

This resolution is irresponsible, shameful, and totally inane. It uses faith as a political tool to divide the nation along religious lines, especially as a time when America is confronted with a multitude of pressing national issues.

E Pluribus Unum. Out of many, one. What's the matter with that?
If I thought it would do any good, I'd write a "letter to the editor" of my local newspaper. But why fuel the religious fire. As a minority, I'd get skewered. This post will have to suffice. (I still might get skewered by any religious nuts out there.) Might does not make right.

posted on Nov 3, 2011 5:13 AM ()

Comments:

Move to Canada. None of that stuff here.
comment by crazylife on Nov 3, 2011 8:11 PM ()
Not a bad idea. If it was warmer, I'd consider it!
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 5:08 AM ()
We really should figure out how much it costs the nation for them to use up the time to vote on such crap.
comment by drmaus on Nov 3, 2011 4:30 PM ()
I don't think we want to know. Adds insult to injury.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 5:08 AM ()
I remember back in 1956 when "under God"n was added to our flag salute. It was the same time that "In God We Trust" was passed by the Legislature as the official motto of the U.S. It was all part of the paranoia of the McCarthy era. We have a lot of that same paranoia prevalent today, as Obama has been accused of being everything from a Communist to a Nazi. It is the far right rearing its ugly head yet again. The nut cases will be all over him again for criticizing this resolution. Actually, the resolution is nothing, as Jeri, stated but a political ploy by the Tea Party and Boehner to try once more to make the Democrats look back if they oppose it.
comment by royalblog on Nov 3, 2011 11:29 AM ()
Perhaps I'll live long enough to see it repealed, but I doubt it. Life goes on. And I go on, remaining angry over the whole misguided motto.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 5:06 AM ()
I think there is a Shakespearean play in here somewhere..."Much to do about Nothing".
comment by dragonflyby on Nov 3, 2011 9:52 AM ()
I realize by your emoticons, you're being facetious. Again, however, I disagree. I don't have time or inclination to rebut.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 5:03 AM ()
It's funny because I totally thought of you when I heard this news yesterday. While I totally see your point, I just don't see why it's that big of a deal. Most American's are religious. Most people believe in something, even if the sun is their God. It doesn't say "In Jesus Christ we trust" which I would see would be a bigger problem. I dunno. I realize where you are coming from but these are my 2 cents!
comment by kristilyn3 on Nov 3, 2011 7:44 AM ()
I suppose you have to be in my shoes to understand how offensive this is to me. Just the words are stupid. Why not "In Sun we trust"? That would make more sense. I mean, what does it mean? Trust in what? It IS a big deal to me.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 5:01 AM ()
It really is a shame they are bored, have nothing to do--maybe we should manufacture some problems for them to keep them busy--you know--'idle hands are the work of the devil' and he has them working for him
comment by greatmartin on Nov 3, 2011 6:45 AM ()
I hope they've taken some heat, but I doubt if they care.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 4:56 AM ()
I find it shameful and totally out of step with the founding principals of the Constitution. Since the pendulum keeps swinging, aren't we about due for some rational religious views, as in live and let live and stop trying to force everyone to see things one way only? fulm.
comment by tealstar on Nov 3, 2011 6:02 AM ()
As an aside, I'm reading a biography of "A. Lincoln" (actual book title). I decided I wasn't informed enough to make those comments to you about him. I'm getting a better handle on who he was, and am in the process of changing my mind! I'll let you know later.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 4:55 AM ()
Don't sweat it. The politicians are merely doing this to get votes from all
kinds of the religious populace.
comment by elderjane on Nov 3, 2011 5:41 AM ()
No "sweat", just irksome. I realize it's pandering to the "public", but it's still totally unnecessary.
reply by solitaire on Nov 4, 2011 4:52 AM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]