Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
168,544
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 hours ago
12 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

Politics & Legal > Republican State of Mind
 

Republican State of Mind

I just can't help myself. I have to talk politics and express my opinion. Eddie, don't read this!

After more than a day of listening to the pundits and analyzers of election day results, I'm of the opinion that they've missed the boat--the BIG boat.

All they seem to focus on is "demographics" and why the Republicans lost (or Democrats won). First of all, the results certainly didn't indicate a so-called mandate. I mean, overall, it was close, presidentially speaking.

The plight of America, right now, is we're involved in a second "civil war". The majority of both sides hate each other. It's really not that civil. The Rush Limbaughs and Chris Mathews of the airwaves fuel the fire, incite the passion as they "tell it as it is". It's my turn now.

I ask myself why Indiana is a member of the red state coalition. (Romney garnered 54% of the vote, 66% in my rural county.) We have large cities, including the Gary "region". We have large student populations (IU, Purdue, Notre Dame, Ball State). We have a significant black and Latino population. Along with women, these are the areas credited with an Obama victory, nationwide. The same minority groups are found in all the southern red states. Obama lost them all ('cepting Florida). Reason(s)??

Here's why, and why it isn't reported as such. In a word, RACISM. White male America is racist and scared. I hear and see it right here in my rural America. My neighbors fear black or Hispanic takeover. And, of course, they don't like gays, women's rights or anything they're not. Let's call a spade a spade.

Ask them (Republicans) what the "issues" are, and they'll say economics or big government or something inane. Never mind they all have jobs or are retired with great pensions and social security. Never mind they own their own homes, their stock portfolios have mushroomed in 4 years, have no major problems. Life is good for them. But, for some reason, they feel threatened. They're afraid the status quo is not so "status". To them, it's like the south fighting for slavery. They're scared of change, right or wrong.

It's not just the rich that vote Republican. Romney garnered nearly two-thirds of white male votes. In all the surrounding counties where I live, Republicans swept every office--EVERY single one! Our economy is booming, joblessness very low. Democrats should be asking why they keep losing. Repeat: white males are racists and scared.

Over and over again, it's the same mantra: family values (whatever that is), old time religion, independent values, government (stay out of my business). The association of these items with Republicanism is deep and powerful. Liberal thinking Democrats need not apply. When Obama once used the "clinging to guns and religion" tag on poor white folks, he just wasn't whistlin' Dixie.

So to keep this white male populace in the fold, Republicans resort to all sorts of manipulations. When they talk about "change", it's really to revert back to the "good ol' days." (I honestly think they would prefer slavery, no women voting, etc.) Republican leaders pray upon the fears and insecurities of their followers. Remember, despite all the good things that has happened over the past 4 years, we were bombarded with "doom and gloom" ads and speeches: "Obamacare", joblessness, abortions, illegal aliens, etc. Scare tactics and lies abound.

With a nearly 50% vote tally (and greater in local races) for president, it's not so much what the Republicans did wrong, but what they did--period (not right). They use key phrases, like leadership, patriotism, family values, less government. However, in doing so, they are deceitful, dishonest, hypocritical, sneaky. They tried to buy the election, spending billions. They tried to subvert voter registrations (and ability to vote). They are obstructionists in every way possible.

No, Republicans don't need to "reach out" to minorities, women and young people. Their base is set in stone. They just need to convince more white males and the elderly that change is bad and that soon, they'll be in the minority.
The sky is falling, the sky is falling!!

For now, I'm might proud of my party and all those that voted Democratic. And I'm especially happy that Joe Donnely beat Richard Mourdock for Indiana's U.S. Senator!! There may be hope after all.


posted on Nov 8, 2012 6:58 AM ()

Comments:

Well said... I agree with it for the most part! I think both sides spend WAY TOO MUCH money on their campaigns and it should be capped... I mean come on! People are starving... anyways, good post!
comment by kristilyn3 on Nov 12, 2012 9:49 AM ()
Ironically, it's those big campaign spenders that don't want to pay more taxes. Like you say, think what better way that money could be used.
reply by solitaire on Nov 13, 2012 5:28 AM ()
My sister did not think that the anti-Obama sentiments had anything to do with racism until I pointed out to her that Obama is always pictured with big, protruding lips and monkey ears. (That is so telling because Obama's mouth is wide and his lips are THIN.) Yes, it is about racism. Whites do not want to share power.
comment by dragonflyby on Nov 10, 2012 7:37 AM ()
You saw my answer to Jon below? Who knows. I think religion is another major factor. How many people still think Obama is Muslim? A lot! Not to mention "Christian values", etc.
reply by solitaire on Nov 11, 2012 5:59 AM ()
This year I felt quite apologetic. I was called a "food stamp parasite," but I don't use food stamps. I was called a "liberal socialist," but I am a registered Democrat and am quite conservative when I handle my checkbook. I was called many things that I am not. One of those things was voiced on the networks by a Tea party wonk who said that Social Securitymeant that I was sucking off the government tit. That made me feel so depressed because for decades I was made to believe my FICA tax was paying for my own Social Security. Oh my! Maybe I should take the Republican advice, run over to Cabelas and purchase a gun and a box of ammo and end it all. Wait! Can you only purchase one round of ammo? I don't want to use more than one.

The aftermath of this election is nearly as bad as the campaign.
Good post.
comment by jondude on Nov 9, 2012 6:36 AM ()
When I asked my golfing buddy, Pastor Ed, why he voted for Romney, he said he was a capitalist, not a socialist. I nodded and grit my teeth, deciding not to argue. At least he's not a bigot.
reply by solitaire on Nov 10, 2012 5:47 AM ()
no comment on this one only to say i learnt a few more swear words listening to a debate on the election in paltalk. Eack speaker had 4 minutes to give his view and boy o boy they were forceful
comment by kevinshere on Nov 8, 2012 9:31 PM ()
If I were you, I wouldn't pay the least bit of attention to American politics. Of course, we don't look outside the U.S. for foreign affairs.
reply by solitaire on Nov 9, 2012 5:31 AM ()
Thank you chicken little
comment by fredo on Nov 8, 2012 1:34 PM ()
Cluck cluck.
reply by solitaire on Nov 9, 2012 5:29 AM ()
I am as pro-white as any white guy, but I'm not oblivious to the real world. If a black guy is more qualified and has more integrity than the white guy, I'll vote for him. Being pro-(fill in your race) is not racism, it's human nature. The teabaggers, on the other hand......
comment by jjoohhnn on Nov 8, 2012 1:16 PM ()
I confess to a small, perhaps unconscious, amount of prejudice. I'm not sure why. Maybe that's why I can identify the problem better. But I'm with you, it's the man and the issues that are important.
reply by solitaire on Nov 9, 2012 5:29 AM ()
Dear Randy, racism was not in the closet during this election. MSNBC covered it quite well by exposing the innuendo in labeling Obama the food stamp president. After 2008, I began to notice that the country was polarizing around race as threatened white, uninformed, or just plan retro citizens began to realize that they were in the minority. Our country is going in that direction. Any other explanation is whistling past the graveyard. Even if I were going to be here to enjoy the full benefits of being in a white minority, I still would not feel threatened. I disagree that Obama has no mandate -- for one thing, if Boehner did not feel threatened by what happened, he would not be sounding conciliatory as he is. Meanwhile, I'm on my way to McConnell's Face Book page with a few pithy remarks.
comment by tealstar on Nov 8, 2012 9:03 AM ()
It's troubling that so many bigots ARE the "white trash" of American--that they, more than anyone, would benefit from Democratic rule--but that they still vote Republican. Again, they're wedded to guns, religion, white supremacy, etc. And, you're right, I forgot about the "food stamp" label.
reply by solitaire on Nov 9, 2012 5:26 AM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]