Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
168,768
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

13 hours ago
15 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

Politics & Legal > Crazy Times
 

Crazy Times

Indiana is "front page" news again.
During last night's debate for U.S. Senator, tea party candidate Richard Mourdock said, in answering a question on abortion rights, "I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen." (i.e., no abortion) Just what we need in Congress--another Todd Akins (R-MO). Geez, this gets scarier and scarier.

At least, some good news is that an Indiana appeals court backed Planned Parenthood, ruling Indiana's bid to cut Medicaid funding is illegal. We were the first state to pass a law (in 2011) barring the organization from receiving the federal money. It may go to the Supreme Court.

Also, right here in Indiana (not that you care), a contentious race is going on for state school superintendent. Our current chief has drawn the ire of most teachers by his agenda to privatize education via private school voucher program and state takeover of "failing schools". As one consequence, college enrollment in education has plummeted, thanks in part to Supt. Bennett's "hard line" on teacher evaluations and accountability. Both he and Mourdock have the "my way or the highway" philosophy.

One more thing while I'm tackling controversial issues. This comes from the "win some, lose some" battleground. I see that a Texas judge ruled against Freedom From Religion Foundation's suit prohibiting high school cheerleaders from showing religious banners at football games (it's okay to do so). Here we have a dichotomy (at least in my humble opinion): free speech vs. separation of church and state. (I realize I'm generalizing the issue.) What do you think Judge Steve?

What would life be like without differing opinions? Again, imagine no religion, no god.

posted on Oct 24, 2012 5:34 AM ()

Comments:

I think those who wish to exhibit their religious preference have the right to do so. They don't have the right to make me into their image, accept their God, be ruled by their philosophy. It's free speech. If it isn't the high school administration displaying the flag, then it is part of our individual rights to express ourselves. By the same rule, I should by allowed to fly a flag at a football game that says, "God sucks. And do the sign of the cross all you want, you ain't gonna win this game."
comment by tealstar on Nov 2, 2012 5:29 PM ()
Mourdock is another a-s. Romney is against all funding for Planned Parenthood and women having any choice. I think his religious beliefs parallel Mourdocks which is why he did not withdraw his support for the candidate.
comment by dragonflyby on Nov 1, 2012 9:08 AM ()
You wouldn't believe all the ads the two senatorial candidates are running! I'm glad I haven't given a penny this year to help fund all this. It only encourages them. Plus, it's money down a rat hole.
reply by solitaire on Nov 2, 2012 4:50 AM ()
We are seeing commercials for and against Indiana candidate Richard Mourdock on the Chicago TV stations. They cover NW Indiana.
comment by boots586 on Oct 27, 2012 12:52 PM ()
The airwaves are flooded with these commercials. Thankfully, I never gave a dime to or for any politically related cause this year. I've made that mistake before and have paid the price--by getting phone call after phone call!
reply by solitaire on Oct 28, 2012 5:34 AM ()
This topic reminded me that, when I was in high school, all the high school choral groups sang at a citywide sunrise service on Easter Sunday. We sang religious songs. Not any more.
And every year there was a day long seminar that all the high school students went to during a school day that was sponsored by and held in many local churches. Also, not any more.
comment by boots586 on Oct 27, 2012 12:50 PM ()
And the "In" club for boys at my high school was Hi-Y. We had to attend various churches in the community as a group. At least it gave me a chance to see the inside of churches I'd otherwise never observe. And you read my comment to Kevin below?
reply by solitaire on Oct 28, 2012 5:31 AM ()
crazy times indeed...
comment by kristilyn3 on Oct 27, 2012 7:24 AM ()
The first thing I thought of when I heard about this cheerleader case was What about the separation of church and state? It is a big deal where I live.
comment by boots586 on Oct 26, 2012 7:19 PM ()
We have a well known atheist living nearby. Any time anything comes up that is even close to violating the church vs state thing, he jumps on it. Including PTOs sponsoring Boy and Girl Scout groups.
reply by boots586 on Oct 27, 2012 12:46 PM ()
Happy that your thought was there. The FFRF is based just north of you in Madison. (I'm a member.)
reply by solitaire on Oct 27, 2012 4:57 AM ()
crazy stuff
comment by crazylife on Oct 26, 2012 5:27 PM ()
there once was religeous instruction in public schools here , it was only 2hours a week for different denominations but i got stopped in the 1970's
comment by kevinshere on Oct 25, 2012 12:53 AM ()
It was only recently that schools abandoned the practice of allowing students to leave school grounds and go to a church for a once a week 2 hr "Bible study". I'm still kicking myself for allowing my children to attend.
reply by solitaire on Oct 25, 2012 4:38 AM ()
Yes,Imagine that there is not sunshine.Yes,Steve this song made famous by John Lennon.
Help!!!!!!!someone is trying to rape me.(kidding)but it was God will Right.Why is everything is God will and why not our will .This is crazy.God is going to save us and get rid of Mitt.
comment by fredo on Oct 24, 2012 1:18 PM ()
Nice to hear from you! And you're right on all counts!
reply by solitaire on Oct 25, 2012 4:35 AM ()
Voters elect these creeps. I wonder if it is an education shortfall. I'm beginning to believe that.
comment by jondude on Oct 24, 2012 7:40 AM ()
You know, I've never quite been able to figure that question out. Me thinks it's some sort of bizarre wiring in the brain, having to do with the reasoning process. Mystery to me.
reply by solitaire on Oct 25, 2012 4:33 AM ()
Isn't that a Beatles song..? "Imagine.. no.. religion.." If the "free speech" is religious speech, and the high school involved is a public school, then the speech has gone too far and gets trumped by the requirement that we maintain a separation between church and state. What happened to cheerleaders just going "Rah, rah, sis-boom-bah"?
comment by steve on Oct 24, 2012 6:48 AM ()
This school issue of freedom of speech has been around for a long time, i.e., locker pin-ups/privacy, t-shirt logos, dress codes, etc. You're right--school laws trump student rights. And the Constitution trumps teacher rights to promote religion. Yeah for that.
reply by solitaire on Oct 25, 2012 4:31 AM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]