Randy

Profile

Username:
solitaire
Name:
Randy
Location:
Rossville, IN
Birthday:
03/24
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Human Resources

Stats

Post Reads:
169,947
Posts:
705
Photos:
16
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

1 hour ago
3 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Par For The Course

Life & Events > Rodney King, 20 Years Later
 

Rodney King, 20 Years Later

It was 20 years ago (March 3, 1991) that Rodney King was beaten nearly to death by four Los Angeles policemen.

King was a punk kid, 20 years old, always in trouble, fleeing the police in a 100 mph chase. The rage in the policemen's assault was videotaped for all the world to see. It was an ugly and vicious attack.

The policemen went to trial with a jury of no blacks. All but one were acquitted (hung jury for the one). Riots (Watts) ensued, with 50 deaths resulting.

The following year, the "hung jury" cop (plus another one, for reasons I don't remember), was convicted of assault, this time, with two blacks on the jury. Jubilation! King was awarded 3.8 million dollars!

Three years later, O.J. Simpson was found innocent (by jury) of murder(s), more than likely with the memory of riots in mind.

Rodney King, 20 years later (from a CNN special), is doing well. He's articulate, physically in shape, happy, and engaged (to one of the former black jurors!). However, he still battles alcoholism, nightmares, and gambling. He's been shot at (wears a bullet-proof vest). And he's broke! Squandered away all his money. No job because of his unreliability and criminal history.

Just thought you might be interested. I have no "editorial" comment. You can add yours.

posted on Mar 6, 2011 6:20 AM ()

Comments:

Other than the comments on the weather, most comments concerned the administration of the law. A great deal of lower court law is affected by Supreme Court decisions that in recent years have veered far to the right and are more punitive and are followed slavishly without regarding for justice or fairness. Maybe I should have prefaced my remarks.
comment by tealstar on Mar 7, 2011 12:14 PM ()
We 'dropped' to 78 degrees today but the sun is out--no rain.
comment by greatmartin on Mar 7, 2011 12:01 PM ()
Rained very lightly yesterday--that's been it.
comment by greatmartin on Mar 7, 2011 11:20 AM ()
You can have some of ours! I'm seldom on the computer this time of day, but I had to miss my usual morning session (went to town). And it's too cold (40) to go outside and pick up sticks (which is on my job list). I'll get to your posts (and others) immediately.
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:33 AM ()
dayum... hard to believe it was that long ago!
comment by kristilyn3 on Mar 6, 2011 4:56 PM ()
How come you haven't written anything about your cruise? Or maybe you have recently.
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:29 AM ()
No comment.Except that OJ got away with the murders of those two victim.
Rodney King no comment on him and not surprised that he is broke.
But that is his life and not mine.The legal systme still stinks.
comment by fredo on Mar 6, 2011 9:57 AM ()
Fortunately, I've never been directly affected by the justice system. But in general, you're so correct.
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:27 AM ()
No, our legal system is faulty. The most egregious trial was that of
O. J. Simpson.
comment by elderjane on Mar 6, 2011 9:03 AM ()
So true. And I like the word egregious. I should use it more often.
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:25 AM ()
Although the second civil trial of Rodney King's cop assaulters provided some modicum of justice, both the criminal prosecutions of the police in King's case and of O.J. Simpson were crippled by bias, and in O.J.'s case, abysmal crime scene investigation and evidence gathering. It did raise the ugly curtain on domestic violence, and thankfully real progress has been made in criminal prosecutions since then.
comment by marta on Mar 6, 2011 8:58 AM ()
There's still much work to be done with regard to criminal investigations. An Indianapolis cop "accidentally" killed a motorcyclist because he was drunk (and on duty). But his blood sample was tested by the "wrong" people. So he got off scott free (so far). Where's the justice here?
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:23 AM ()
The law, according to strict interpreters, must always be followed but it isn't always "fair". The Supreme Court is a classic example and it, of course, is lately a hotbed of reactionary right demagogue with about as much freedom from bias as Himmler. I am hoping that, with time, Obama's appointees will make themselves felt.
comment by tealstar on Mar 6, 2011 8:40 AM ()
I'm trying to relate your comment to the post subject, but having difficulty. Am I missing something? (What you say is true, however.)
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:19 AM ()
And videos of 'events' are now shown 24/7 on news casts instead of news reports
comment by greatmartin on Mar 6, 2011 8:06 AM ()
'Tis all the rage. Getting any rain down there?
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:17 AM ()
I think OJ was acquitted because he was a football hero. I was outraged by the results of both trials- King's beating and OJ's trial. They are proof that our legal system does not always work.
comment by dragonflyby on Mar 6, 2011 7:27 AM ()
I wonder what's become of O.J. after the Vegas arrest a couple of years ago? I suppose he's still out playing golf, getting away with murder, literally.
reply by solitaire on Mar 7, 2011 11:16 AM ()

Comment on this article   


705 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]