Susil

Profile

Username:
susil
Name:
Susil
Location:
Carthage, MS
Birthday:
01/05
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
127,142
Posts:
759
Photos:
4
Last Online:
> 30 days ago

My Friends

1 day ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

News From Mississippi

Arts & Culture > Passion of Jeanne D'arc
 

Passion of Jeanne D'arc

Movie Review

Title: Passion of Jeanne d'Arc
Filmed in 1928, silent, B/W
Starring: Renee Falconetti

Yesterday TCM ran a series of movies about Joan of Arc and the best one is a cinematographic masterpiece. Long before Orson Welles etal tried new camera angles and techniques, film maker Carl Theodor Dreyer did use innovative camera work to make this remarkable movie.

Jeanne (Joan) as you all know, was a French peasant girl who felt compelled by God to help the beleagured French King fight against the English. Saying God directed her to do this ruffled priestly feathers, and she was imprisoned and tortured and attempts were made to make her sign a document that it was the devil, not God who was guiding her. After being tortured, she did sign the document--with a priest guiding her hand and signing-- but she recanted.
This was the trial where she was brought up on charges of heresy and witch craft by ecclesiastical jurist who sought to force her to recant her claims of holy visions. Director Dreyer chose not to fictionalize the story, and used trial documents instead.
Jeanne was played by Renee Falconetti, a marvelous actress, with such an expressive face, every emotion was so clear and poignant that words really weren't needed. She was absolutely wonderful.

Director Dreyer did not allow his actors to wear any makeup, so there was none of that silent movie lipstick and mascara for men--nope, every actor's warts and wrinkles were plain to see. Jeanne's hair was cut short, so her boyish pixie haircut looks modern today--no dated silent era movie look.

There were a couple of things that weren't apropos--one priest was wearing glasses--which hadn't been invented at that time in history--and in the scene where Jeanne's hair was cut to the scalp prior to being tied to the stake, the priest used scissors--also an invention far into the future.

In 1431 Jeanne d'Arc was burned at the stake in the courtyard of Rouen Castle. Through the flames and smoke, she gazed at a flock of birds taking wing as the fire overtook her.

Jeanne d'Arc 1412/1431

susil

posted on Mar 14, 2011 11:20 AM ()

Comments:

I missed this version, but I watched a little of Ingrid Bergman's 1948 portrayal of Joan. Not believable. I'm a book reader, not a film watcher.
comment by solitaire on Mar 17, 2011 5:38 AM ()
Hi sol; I'm a book reader AND film watcher.
reply by susil on Mar 18, 2011 9:04 AM ()
Hard to believe women were actually burned at the stake because people thought they were witches.
comment by redimpala on Mar 15, 2011 8:53 PM ()
Hi red; ghastly wasn't it? That people actually believed that. That's why it's called the dark ages maybe.
reply by susil on Mar 18, 2011 9:05 AM ()
I am a refugee from Sylvester Stallone right now so it sounds really appealing.
comment by elderjane on Mar 14, 2011 6:41 PM ()
Hi jeri; I had seen this movie once before on TCM, but instead of watching something else, was compelled to watch again because from the first minute of it, you can't turn away.
reply by susil on Mar 18, 2011 9:08 AM ()
I was going to watch that, however I chose not to. Some things I just can't deal with even when it's "just a movie"
Thanks for the summery
comment by anacoana on Mar 14, 2011 2:06 PM ()
Hi ana; that's why I have never watcher Schindler's List--I can't bear the realism of it.
reply by susil on Mar 18, 2011 9:09 AM ()
I like to imagine the movie-goers in 1928 getting dressed up to go to the theater to see this picture. I'm reading Butterfield 8 by John O'Hara right now, it was written in 1935, set in 1931, when people were just digging in to cope with the great depression, so a movie from 1928 isn't far from my current mind set. As you know I love books written at the time of something like that, not merely ABOUT the time, looking back.
comment by troutbend on Mar 14, 2011 2:05 PM ()
I was just reading that Liz Taylor is in very bad shape, and the article mentioned she won an Oscar for her role in Butterfield 8.
reply by susil on Mar 18, 2011 9:11 AM ()
You give it a great review Ms. Sue. As for the tragedy, the church strikes again.
comment by tealstar on Mar 14, 2011 1:14 PM ()
Hi teal, and thanks. All the actors were superb in this. The cunning and slyness of the priests were all clear in their facial expressions, but weren't overacted, which showed the director was way ahead of his time.
reply by susil on Mar 14, 2011 1:23 PM ()

Comment on this article   


759 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]