Jon Adams

Profile

Username:
jondude
Name:
Jon Adams
Location:
Tiffin, OH
Birthday:
05/05
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Design

Stats

Post Reads:
306,213
Posts:
1410
Photos:
12
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

A Minority Of One

Politics & Legal > Tea Party Platform ... ?
 

Tea Party Platform ... ?

Every week, the Tea Party Nation hosts a weekly radio program, calling itself a “home for conservatives.” Two weeks ago, Tea Party Nation President Judson Phillips hosted the program and discussed changes that he felt should be made to voting rights in the United States. He explained that the founders of the country originally put “certain restrictions on who gets the right to vote.” He continued, “One of those was you had to be a property owner. And that makes a lot of sense, because if you’re a property owner you actually have a vested stake in the community. If you’re not a property owner, you know, I’m sorry but property owners have a little bit more of a vested interest in the community than non-property owners”:

PHILLIPS: The Founding Fathers originally said, they put certain restrictions on who gets the right to vote. It wasn’t you were just a citizen and you got to vote. Some of the restrictions, you know, you obviously would not think about today. But one of those was you had to be a property owner. And that makes a lot of sense, because if you’re a property owner you actually have a vested stake in the community. If you’re not a property owner, you know, I’m sorry but property owners have a little bit more of a vested interest in the community than non-property owners.

posted on Nov 30, 2010 6:16 PM ()

Comments:

Does that mean those who do not own property and therefor cannot vote do not have to pay taxes either? Why should someone who cannot participate in government pay for the decisions others make?
comment by dragonflyby on Dec 6, 2010 6:52 AM ()
I can't really comment on this, as I don't know enough to cast an opinion on it.
There is something I have meant to enquire about for some time. It is this: So often on television, I have been watching a movie or similar and a person has stated that they are going to "Take the fifth" on something. I realise that they are referring to 'The fifth amendment' - but what is it? This has been a puzzle to me for ages!
comment by augusta on Dec 4, 2010 4:54 PM ()
(Wikipedia)
The Fifth Amendment (Amendment V) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, protects against abuse of government authority in a legal procedure. Its guarantees stem from English common law which traces back to the Magna Carta in 1215. For instance, grand juries and the phrase "due process" both trace their origin to the Magna Carta.

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
reply by jondude on Dec 4, 2010 7:02 PM ()
Barf.
comment by marta on Dec 4, 2010 12:18 PM ()
If women can't be trusted to vote, the ones who own property should probably forfeit it to right-thinking Tea Party members for proper administration.
comment by troutbend on Dec 3, 2010 6:18 PM ()
Everytime I see someone supporting the tea party, my opinion of them automatically goes down because they have just identified themselves as ignorant, gullible, and bigoted.
comment by redimpala on Dec 2, 2010 1:15 PM ()
I have a neighbor down the road with a tea party sign in his yard. I get disgusted just seeing it. I hate to admit that simply knowing someone is a Republican (let alone a tea partier) repulses me and influences my attitude toward that person.
comment by solitaire on Dec 2, 2010 6:13 AM ()
I am surprised to hear Scalia is so medieval. I knew he was conservative and that I wouldn't agree with him on most civil and moral issues, but removing the right to vote from non property owners and women calls for committing him to some kind of mental institution.
comment by tealstar on Dec 1, 2010 8:50 AM ()
I am surprised he didn't tell us how they intend to repeal the Emancipation Proclamation and bring back slavery.
comment by jondude on Dec 1, 2010 8:00 AM ()
Th male Palin!!!
comment by greatmartin on Nov 30, 2010 8:29 PM ()
What an elitist p...k.
comment by tealstar on Nov 30, 2010 7:29 PM ()
Interesting: Supreme Court Justice Scalia believes and advocates getting rid of the 18th Amendment to the Constitution, which gives the right to vote to all citizens over 21. Only property owners would be able to vote. Not women, either.
reply by jondude on Dec 1, 2010 6:32 AM ()
I fail to see how property owners have any more "vested interest" in a community. Renters are also taxpayers and utility payers. We pay for titles on our cars and trucks, participate in civic activities and pay out the nose for public services. I was a property owner twice, 8 years and 26 years, and I didn't feel I had a larger "vested interest" in anything except my divorce lawyers' yachts.
comment by jondude on Nov 30, 2010 6:30 PM ()

I guess he doesn't have the pits to take on women!
comment by jjoohhnn on Nov 30, 2010 6:20 PM ()
I always thought the Tea Party only could appeal to nutcases, and this guy has proved me correct.
reply by jondude on Nov 30, 2010 6:23 PM ()
You get what you vote for.
comment by jondude on Nov 30, 2010 6:16 PM ()

Comment on this article   


1,410 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]