Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
691,043
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

Entertainment > Movies > The Woman--2008--a Movie Review
 

The Woman--2008--a Movie Review

I went in not expecting much and therefore wasn't too disappointed. This version has none of the humor, the sauciness, the cattiness of the original and with the exception of Candice Bergen none of this cast is up to the standards of the 1939 actresses.
Both
films don't have any men in them but the newest one makes the glaring
error of having shots where men must/would be seen whereas the former
avoided such scenes and men were really in the background unseen.

I
don't understand why film people remake classics--why not tackle films
that were almost classic? Very few remakes---Psycho, Manchurian
Candidate, etc.--are any good though there have been exceptions like
the second versions of A Star Is Born, Imitation of Life and An Affair
To Remember.

Getting back to the remake of
The Women aside from deviating so far from the original the biggest
disappointment was the cast. AnnetteBening was the biggest disappointment to me as she is a fine actress but seems very phony and had none of the fire of Roz Russell. Eva Mendes
is/was no match to/for Joan Crawford in the role of Crystal Allen--in
fact Eva, especially in the bath scene looks like she would be more
comfortable with JadaPinkett Smith playing a lesbian--why?? To make the movie feel more 2008??? I don't remember Debra Messing's role in the original or at least the whole baby thing.  Bette Miller has, maybe, 5 minutes on screen asa The Countess who was more important in the original.

Meg Ryan neither adds or distracts from the movie in sort of a Norma Shearer way--both played the bland Mary Haines. Cloris Leachman and Tilly Scott Pedersen try to lighten things up but don't succeed.
Candice
Bergan gets the few laughs in the film and plays her role more honestly
with feeling and really gives the only performance worth watching

The biggest failure of the movie was that
these women are facing more meaty issues than those in the original but
they don't deal with them! And the actresses in the original brought
more to their roles making them outrageous and memorable! :O)

I would suggest getting both films on DVD and watching the original first to see why it is a classic and then watching the remake to see why/how it failed.

posted on Sept 16, 2008 7:10 PM ()

Comments:

Have no interest in this one.Thank you for the review.
comment by fredo on Sept 17, 2008 10:07 AM ()
I agree...the originals are always better?
comment by strider333 on Sept 16, 2008 8:09 PM ()
I agree with you about not understanding why people remake classics that really worked well. How do you improve on perfection?
AJ
comment by lunarhunk on Sept 16, 2008 7:13 PM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]