Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
690,580
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

9 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

Arts & Culture > After the Revolution--theatre Review
 

After the Revolution--theatre Review

   

It
wasn't 5 minutes into "After The Revolution" before I was thinking I
was back in a Broadway theatre--in the 1950s and 60s. The British
theatre, starting with "Look Back In Anger", brought the 'kitchen sink
drama'
to Broadway and Paddy
Chayefsky was showing the American family falling apart. While his plays
took place in the Bronx this one is about a middle class
Manhattan/Massachusetts family.  The politics ring of Arthur Miller and the family dynamics of Edward Albee
and in no way does the playwright Amy Herzog write the dialogue of the aforementioned or the drama of the situation.

The
basic situation is that a book will be published that could possibly
destroy the reputation of one Joe Joseph known for standing up against
Joseph McCarthy during the communist witch hunt in the 1950s. He is now
dead but, as the play opens, his granddaughter Emma is graduating law
school and she has founded the Joe Joseph Fund to fight injustice and is
being presented with the possibility of a huge donation. What she
doesn't know, and her father has lied about to her all these years, is
that the grandfather who is her hero, was a spy for the communists. Any
similarity between the Rosenbergs and Joseph is not coincidental. Emma turns against her father for not telling her the truth and making her believe in a lie..

Just
as Ben's mother had left him and his brother when they were young
Emma's mother has left her and her sister Jess. Ben's wife, Emma's
stepmother, tries to keep the family together while the grandmother uses
her deafness as a convenience. Others involved are Miguel, Emma's
boyfriend and her associate at the Fund along with Morty, a peer of her
grandfather who plans to leave teh Fund his money instead of giving it to his children.

Between
the family dynamics and the political aspects it is a big 'kitchen
sink'  which is not handled well just as is the case with the acting and
directing.

Jackie Rivera, as Emma, handles the vulnerability aspect well but falls down as the lawyer and Fund leader. Ben, the father, played by Gordon McConnell has 2 very effective monologues but falls in a couple of key spots. Jess, played by Tiffany-Leigh Moskow,
is the sister who has just returned from rehab and finds herself the
'favorite' daughter now that her father and sister are at odds. Howard Elfman as the benefactor throws what could be a strong role away and Harriet Oser, the grandmother, is not sure enough in her role to get all the laughs, and drama, provided by the author.

Nancy Barnett, as Ben's wife and the daughters stepmother sparkles in her role while Arturo Fernandez shows strentgh as a man standing up for himself both as as Emma's lover and associate. Michael H. Small, as Ben's brother and the
uncle Emma can depend upon is a package unto himself which is good as
his character doesn't seem to belong in this play with all his optimism
and good will.

Margaret M. Ledford,
the director, dropped the ball in getting the best out her actors
though certainly knows how to use them on the excellent set by Tim
Bennett. Only a decade away Erin Amico, the costume designer, doesn't have any problems and the lighting design is unobtrusive except, not his fault, when one of the actors step out of the spotlight.

Amy
Herzog, the writer of "After The Revolution", needed the sensibilties
that Chayefsky, Albee and Miller brought to their plays.

An aside: the audience was old enough to have lived through that period of time and their reaction was, "So what? People did what they had to do" or "There were a lot of anti-semites then and most of the ones McCarthy picked on were Jews."





 

posted on Oct 22, 2011 2:09 PM ()

Comments:

As a theatergoer for 63 years, you have my admiration and gratitude. The Caldwell is fortunate to have you as a regular attendee. I can appreciate a negative review if it is well informed and justified. I did not like your review because I feel your sentiment is too narrow. I came across your posting in the most accidental, circuitous fashion and I don't know who reads or follows you. I did not mean to disrespect you- you are not a professional critic- you are a man with an opinion and I recognize your entitlement to be just that. I am a man whose opinion is that your opinion is hyper specific and not representative of the vast majority who have been exposed to this production. I responded to your posting in order to insure that your readers (whomever they might be be) be aware of the substantial amount of coverage that is in complete disagreement with your posting. You are entitled to your assessment and your readers are entitled to know that many other assessments exist. MHS
comment by michaelh on Oct 31, 2011 12:39 PM ()
And how do you define 'professional' critic? My reviews go out to over 3,000 people--I get paid by 3 web sites to review PROFESSIONAL, not regional, (hey you want to be insulting I guess I can be too LOL) including ALL touring companies--I write different reviews for most sites very seldom copying and pasting the same to all.
Again I am sorry you didn't like my review but NOT all critics agree--John Simon, Chapman, Kerr, just to name a few have 'slaughtered' shows that became big hits--so what?
Now go back to your corner and continue crying or grow up and realize not the whole world will love you--or the shows at the Caldwell--and to respond with a nasty comment(s) certainly doesn't reflect well on you or the Caldwell.
'I did not like your review because I feel your sentiment is too narrow.'
.' I did not mean to disrespect you- you are not a professional critic-'
'your opinion is hyper specific'
'if it is well informed and justified'
'With all due respect, I question your knowledge of theater.'
I just love all the respect!!!!
reply by greatmartin on Oct 31, 2011 1:05 PM ()
My Dear Sir,
I acknowledge your right to your opinion. Your review is contrary to EVERY professional theater critic who has assessed this production. The audience response has been uniformly and consistently supportive. As a union actor for 30 years, I consider myself to be a good judge of theater. I am proud of this production and would be horrified if anyone who reads your posting makes their decision not to see this strong show without exploring all of the other evaluations that have been published about it. There are 7 professionally written reviews of AFTER THE REVOLUTION and they all praise the show, the cast, the direction, the set, etc. Every review recommends the production unequivocally. If your opinion is an honest one and not just deliberately contrary, it is in the abject minority. With all due respect, I question your knowledge of theater. Yours, Michael H. Small
comment by michaelh on Oct 31, 2011 11:57 AM ()
I have been going to the theatre for over 63 years--have seen all the greats--and will put my knowledge about the theatre against yours anytime as a theate goer or as a professional--I am sorry you didn't like my review but others didn't like your show either--a couple sitting next to us left after intermission--I heard many--yes, many.--negative comments.
'With all due respect'--sorry I don't see the respect in your comment that you are talking about--my review is NOT 'deliberately contrary'--a couple of the performances were certainly not worthy such as my references to Harriet Oser and the play said nothing new nor was it presented in a way to hold MY interest and that is what a critic does--report about a play THEY saw.
I am glad 7 'professional' (is this the respect you were showing me? LOL) liked the production--I didn't and I have been coming to the Caldwell since the old mall days and have admired many productions.
reply by greatmartin on Oct 31, 2011 12:09 PM ()
Unread. Just to say I opened your post!
comment by solitaire on Oct 23, 2011 5:20 AM ()
what can I say.You do a beautiful job in writing and reviewing.
Though I have not heard about this but glad that I have now.
You are a very talented man in writing as I said to you so often how I envy the writing.Thank you for this review.
comment by fredo on Oct 22, 2011 2:30 PM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]