Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
690,923
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

Entertainment > Movies > The Iron Lady---a Movie Review
 

The Iron Lady---a Movie Review


Meryl Streep is, in all probability, the most awarded, if not financially rewarded,
actresses of the past few generations. She is called 'the best actress
of several generations' and holds the record for the most Oscar
nominations and received her 19th for "The Iron Lady". She is acclaimed all over the world and, recently, starred in, and carried, 4 major pictures.

In
"The Iron Lady" she gives a master class in acting, showing how to use
an accent, wardrobe and make up to impersonate, not become, Margaret
Thatcher. There are a small group of people, and I belong to them, who
claim that they can see Streep acting, not becoming the character she is playing. She puts over who
Thatcher may have been but because she is so much into her impersonation
that she doesn't connect with anyone else in the film from Jim Broadbent playing her husband Dennis, Olivia Brown as her daughter Carol or the
various actors playing the politicians she was involved with.

Alexandra
Roach who plays the young Margaret Thatcher is a more realistic human
being, with feelings, while Streep portrays the elder as a person
without connections to the human beings around her.

The direction by Phyllida Lloyd, and the screenplay by Abi Morgan, is confusing at times and, aside from the fact that Thatcher
was the first female Prime Minister of England, unless you come with the knowledge of her run in office and what she did, or didn't do, you won't learn much or her importance in history.

Americans
will hear a lot in the movie that they are hearing now from the
Republicans as they seek the nomination for President and though the
film should resonate with the American audience they already may be bored with election stories and the movie will be too slow moving.

Jim
Broadbent brings what emotions, warmth, he can to the film but Streep is
too busy 'acting' to bring any part of the human being that Thatcher
may have been, still she may win that third Oscar.

posted on Jan 27, 2012 5:46 PM ()

Comments:

I've seen trailers for this and thought it looked interesting. I never cared much for Streep as an actress but I might give it a peek when it comes out on Netflix.

reguards
yer wouldn't pay $10 to see it at the theater though pal
bugg
comment by honeybugg on Jan 28, 2012 2:40 AM ()
I paid $5--they owe me money!
reply by greatmartin on Jan 28, 2012 8:13 AM ()
A part of me would like to see this because you know how much I love politics, but I have never been a fan of Mrs. Thatcher. She represented everything that I don't particularly like about conservativism. I don't know if i could stomach the film as a result.
comment by trekbrarian on Jan 27, 2012 7:24 PM ()
Trust me, anything you hear in the movie you have heard about or seen on TV or the papers after the last 2,000 debates--there is a segment on the Falklands but not much on politics or her life or anything else!!! Not really a movie worth seeing even IF (and she shouldn't) wins the Oscar.
reply by greatmartin on Jan 27, 2012 7:59 PM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]