Having just watched the Youtube video whereabouts mentions (in which people say that the WTC Towers and the 3rd building fell because of explosives placed in them) I am again struggling with trying to be reasonable. And not sure what reasonable is anymore.

In these latter days, knowing that the government lies to us very frequently, even about things that it is unimportant to lie to us about, is a burden. In fact, knowing the government lies in general is evidence to support that it is lying in a given instance.


That isn't proof -- and if the govt. were a person on trial, we should scream that a liar often tells the truth, and the possibility that he IS telling the truth is present every single time he speaks -- but then, looserobes could tell us how a witness's past behavior as a liar will usually be used as evidence against him. Not proof, but evidence.

We are very aware that every statement our governments make has a purpose, and usually part of it is crowd control. It has a definite interest, then, in lying to us or at least omitting information.

Once, it happened that several investigators long ago came to my door demanding I answer some questions. (Not about myself.) And in doing so they told me a big lie. It was something I was in a position to know; as if someone stood in front of you and told you that you had your shoes on the wrong feet. You know if that's true or not. I don't remember if I argued about it, but I wondered why they said it. It was such a stupid thing. They KNEW that I knew it wasn't true.


So I know for myself that officials lie in order to get information. And I believe that police probably lie to people they're interrogating all the time, in order to get someone to argue the point, or elaborate. TV shows make it appear it is standard practice.

So.... If the federal government knew that there were other factors that brought down the World Trade Centers besides the planes crashing into them, then I am unsurprised that we would not be told. That would cause investigations of corporations which run, secure and maintain the towers, and countless peripheral companies. The govt. doesn't want to tell us much about what it's investigating. Sort of spoils the surprise.

And I have to agree that the fall of the buildings looks just like every planned demolition of every Vegas hotel I've ever seen on video. Also, firemen at the ground level spoke of explosions they thought were occurring at the bottoms of the elevator shafts.

On the other hand, I know that physical processes are often misunderstood and misinterpreted. Even people well specialized in the scientific processes are known to have overlooked things which change the entire aspect of what they're studying.

For instance, there's the melting point of the metals used in the buildings. Iron's melting point is, what, around 2800 degrees Fahrenheit, which some people say it is impossible for the fires in the towers to have reached.

Yeah, and the melting point of aluminum is I think around 1200 F. -- Which my electric stovetop burner shouldn't be able to reach. So then why did my teapot's bottom melt and DRIP off when I forgot it until it had boiled dry and I finally lifted it off? It was made of aluminum.

No one can tell me so far!

We need very careful science when it comes to incidents far more important than my teapot. I'm willing to hear more from materials engineers, chemists, explosives, etc on it.