Laura

Profile

Username:
troutbend
Name:
Laura
Location:
Estes Park, CO
Birthday:
08/01
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Hotel - Hospitality

Stats

Post Reads:
482,997
Posts:
1942
Photos:
15
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

This Oughta Be Good

News & Issues > Looserobes: Casey Anthony Trial
 

Looserobes: Casey Anthony Trial

I'd just gotten done watching the TGI Fridays waitperson get sentenced to jail for flipping the bird at one of the prosecutors in the Casey Anthony courtroom, and here came this guest post from our buddy Looserobes.


CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL

The defense blew this case the moment they opened their mouth. When Anthony’s lawyer announced to the jurors in his opening statement that they would show the tot died accidentally in the family pool and that the defendant’s father buried the body, that was nothing less than a monumental gaffe. By doing that, he effectively switched the burden of proof from the State to the defense, and they would have had to put the defendant on the stand to accomplish that. As everyone who has watched this trial unfold knows, putting the known liar Casey Anthony on the witness stand would have subjected her to withering and deadly cross-examination. She would have convicted herself.

Had the defense, instead, relied on the time-honored strategy of simply arguing that the State had failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, they would have had a shot. The case, wholly circumstantial, left plenty of room for a reasonable doubt argument. Now, jurors have to wonder, what happened to the promise by the defense attorney regarding the drowning claim?

The jury has yet to get the case, of course, and anything could happen. The prospect of State rebuttal and defense surrebuttal remain. But when juries get cases, weird things have happened (can you say OJ?). Remember Johnny Cochran’s mantra? If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit. In the Casey Anthony case, the prosecutor’s gambit could be: duct tape on the mouth, her case goes south.

posted on June 30, 2011 1:02 PM ()

Comments:

I live in Tampa where it headlines the news nearly every day. They even have a TV show to recap all of the day's testimonies ans rulings. It's a real circus!
comment by dragonflyby on July 4, 2011 12:11 PM ()
I am aware of the case but am not following it closely. It does seem that she killed her child, or so my gut tells me. I know how judges must love to hear that.
comment by tealstar on July 3, 2011 7:20 PM ()
Someone who was related to her was either here or on Blogster. I don't remember her name. She stopped blogging, I think, before the little girl was found and the case became murder.
This story is of far more concern to the public than, say, whether Charlie Sheen gets another TV show or not. I am interested in how the public, the jury, and the legal system will treat a young woman against whom the case is, as looserobes says, entirely circumstantial. Sure, everyone hates her or at least dislikes her. And we suspect she has done the worst, or close to the worst, or something awful. For instance I'd bet she had a boyfriend helping her get the body disposed of. But from my seat way back here, it just didn't look like the state proved murder beyond a reasonable doubt.
comment by drmaus on July 2, 2011 11:54 AM ()
She is still here and still blogs. She just had everything related to Casey and Caley removed because both the press and the legal system (investigators)were using her posts in an unscrupulous manner.
reply by dragonflyby on July 4, 2011 12:09 PM ()
Can't say I've paid much attention to this case.
comment by solitaire on July 2, 2011 5:38 AM ()
She has woven so many lies that they will in the end strangle her just
like the evil kidzu on the back fence wants to strangle all other plant
matter.
comment by elderjane on July 1, 2011 4:37 AM ()
Thankfully, I have not watched one minute of the trial or the news reports about it. I believe it was a gross error to ever allow TV cameras in courtroom, unless they were those sham courts like "Judge Judy," etc, which are solely produced for entertainment.
comment by jondude on July 1, 2011 4:31 AM ()
At this point,this is getting sickly.
Dragged on liked all of these suspect.
Whether she is guilty or not
Lets get this over with.
Starting to be boring.
When I hear this on the news,shut it off.
There are other things out there,beside this one.
boring.Sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
comment by fredo on June 30, 2011 2:12 PM ()
I'm sure Steve is interested in it since he was a judge in Florida, and based on that, I'm interested in what he has to say.
reply by troutbend on June 30, 2011 2:35 PM ()
Well I shouldn't say that. I think she is guilty. That makes more sense.
comment by kristilyn3 on June 30, 2011 1:11 PM ()
I hope she is found guilty.
comment by kristilyn3 on June 30, 2011 1:11 PM ()

Comment on this article   


1,942 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]