Profile
Photos
Comments
Deuteronomy 30:19
"I call heaven and earth as witnesses today against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live;
I suppose one of my friends did it as a joke (not funny) OR one of my liberal associates did it to get my goat. It was an email sent to me regarding Michigan Senate Bill 776, from some outfit called, progressmichigan.org/choice..
On second thought the sender was more likely to be of the liberal bent because any of my "normal" friends would know I find absolutely NOTHING remotely funny about the slaughtering of 50 million unborn Americans.
According to the aforementioned web site Bill 776 prohibits "partial birth abortion" even in the cases of a woman's health (most time's meaning she's depressed), however the progressmich.org/choice bunch doesn't CALL it "partial birth abortion" instead they refer to it as:
"a rarely used, yet medically necessary abortion method and does not provide an exception to protect a woman's health (which is according the web site ) outlawed in Michigan and across the country."
I know lib's can't be bothered by a silly little thing like the truth but the fact is this hideous procedure is practiced every single day in America in spite of it's apparent (?) legal status. Just ask millionaire "Killer Tiller" of Kansas fame.
George "Killer" Tillerhttps://www.dr-tiller.com/
If it's already " outlawed here and across the country", why be all up in arms about this Bill anyway and why hasn't brother Tiller been brought to justice?
again and according to the article :
State legislators in Michigan were pushing through an unnecessary and wasteful bill, which would prohibit abortion methods that were already banned by the ultra-conservative U.S. Supreme Court.
I would love to know what country this "ultra-conservative U.S. Supreme court" is in, I think I would like to MOVE THERE!
But alas, the left's "culture of death" marches on and never ceases in its relentless bending of the truth and with new leaders and even more gruesome ways to murder children.
For example take the grand pooh bah of intellectual left one Peter Singer Professor of Bioethics, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 1999-2004, part-time, 2005- , a man whom the New England Journal of Medicine believes has had "more success in effecting changes in acceptable behavior" than any philosopher since Bert rand Russell. The New Yorker called him the "most influential" philosopher alive.
Peter Singer, referred to by some as "Dr Death." Tiller must be jealous.I'm not going to write about his views on sexuality, not in this post anyway but I may re-visit that in another article sometime on the vile professor Singer. No, for this article I will concentrate on his views on abortion and the "women's right to choose" to kill her baby. Mr Singer, who subscribes to the philosophy that "Any activity is ethical as long as it is consensual" fails to see that a baby doesn't necessarily "consent" to being burned to death with a saline solution and chopped into little pieces.
Mr Singer believes it is morally ok to kill a baby up to two weeks after it is born. No wait, I'm wrong and when I'm wrong I will admit it. He DID say that but then apologized. NOW, he thinks THAT is to restrictive and it should be up to two YEARS after the child is born. If that's not bad enough, THEN you should be able to harvest its organs for any siblings you so graciously allowed to be born if THEY happen to be sick and in need of a transplant.
Good grief people, I mean COME ON, do you REALLY support THIS kind of ghoulish philosophy? He should be ....I just had to delete everything I wrote after "He should be" because I would be arrested.
Instead I'll quote something "good" that the professor said. He said:
If infanticide under "strict" conditions were legalized, the conditions would soon be loosened, reporters would discover inequities where it was allowed in some circumstances and not others, and soon infanticide on parental demand would become standard. That's what happened with abortion.
Ya think?
Currently you can kill your baby with impunity, right up to the instant before it's born. Soon the sky's the limit I guess. Don't like the college they want to go to? BLAM! Hey, it's YOUR right to choose....right?
Pro choice?In 2002, as an Illinois legislator,Burack Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote.
NARAL wasn't even against the federal bill but Obama voted against this bill in the Illinois senate and killed it in committee. Twice, the Induced Infant Liability Act came up in the Judiciary Committee on which he served. At its first reading he voted “present.” ( Obama has voted "present" over 100 time's on various "tough call" issues, a real leader this guy) At the second he voted “no.”
The bill was then referred to the senate’s Health and Human Services Committee, which Obama chaired after the Illinois Senate went Democratic in 2003. As chairman, he never called the bill up for a vote.
Jill Stanek, a registered delivery-ward nurse testified before Obama about how infants born alive were left by doctors to die. He was unmoved, instead he was concerned not with the baby but with the women, in his words,
"What we are doing here is to create one more burden on a woman and I can't support that.”
I wonder what the babies thought of their "burden"?
More recently Obama shared his "morality" with us by stating:
"When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence education and teaching the children -- teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby. I don't want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. You know, so it doesn't make sense to not give them information."
Abortion, then "partial birth abortion" (in case you don't know what that is)
[D]eliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother, for the purpose of performing an overt act that the person knows will kill the partially delivered living fetus;
Now, infanticide. This MUST be stopped in America. This is not who we are as a people, or at least not who we were before the A.C.L.U. and their liberal accomplices in the culture of death brought us to this.
I am so sick of the "save the trees, save the whales, save the polar bears, and kill the babies" attitude that so many people have these days.
24 week old fetus (picture courtesy of CBR ,"Center for Bio-Ethical Reform") THIS, is what you "pro choicer's" fight for! Given a choice this PERSON would not have chosen this I don't believe!
I'm sure some of you lefties will skewer me with your usual "tolerant" comments but in this case I just don't care if you like it or not. Sometimes the truth hurts. When it comes to " right to life" I'm a pit bull, so bring it.
The time for choice is before you have sex, not after your "punished" with a baby.
Just my opinion,
Bill
https://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/34576/