Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
691,140
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

News & Issues > Outrageous??? Ridiculous??? Both???
 

Outrageous??? Ridiculous??? Both???


TV Ad Spending to Set Record In Presidential Race






Filed at 5:33 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The 2008 presidential race, which has already
drawn a record number of dollars and voters, is poised to shatter another
record: the amount of money spent on television advertisements.

As Democrat Barack
Obama
and Republican John
McCain
barnstorm across the country before the November election, they will
spend heavily on ads that will increasingly reflect the cut-and-thrust of the
campaign.

Total spending on TV ads in the presidential race is expected to top $800
million, said Evan Tracey, chief operating officer of the Campaign Media
Analysis Group, which tracks political advertising. Such spending totaled $500
million, the previous record, in the 2004 race.

That's good news for the television business, which is suffering from a
pullback in spending from automotive, real estate and financial service
advertisers.

Thanks in part to the expected boost from the U.S. election, spending on
network and local TV advertisements is expected to rise between 2 percent and 3
percent in 2008 while cable TV advertising is expected to rise 6 percent,
according to ZenithOptimedia.

"Every month, every quarter we're setting records," CBS Corp chief financial officer Fred Reynolds said at a
recent investor conference. The company, which owns the CBS network and local
television stations, billed a record of nearly $30 million in political
advertising in the first quarter of 2008, he said.

Other companies expected to benefit from the campaign include General
Electric Co's NBC and Walt Disney Co's ABC; broadcasters like Sinclair Broadcast
Group, Belo Corp and Hearst-Argyle Television; and media companies such as Gannett Co Inc and Meredith Corp.

Even in the YouTube era, TV advertising is still the best way to reach wide
swaths of voters directly, experts say. TV ads also shape news coverage and are
frequently replayed, at no charge, during newscasts.

BEYOND THE BATTLEGROUNDS
This year, those ads will not just run on in a few states.
Obama had raised $286 million through the end of May and is expected to raise
hundreds of millions more by November.

He has already bought air time in solidly Republican states like Alaska,
Montana and Indiana, in an attempt to force McCain to defend states he would
otherwise take for granted.

The Democratic candidate also might advertise nationally during high-profile
events like the Olympics or baseball's World Series, and seek smaller, select
audiences with spots on cable channels like the youth-oriented MTV.

McCain will be limited to $85 million in public money during the campaign's
last two months because he did not opt out of the public campaign-finance
system, unlike Obama. So the Arizona senator will be forced to pick his
advertising spots more carefully.

"McCain has the potential to stay competitive, but I think that's the best he
can hope for," Tracey said.

Both candidates are already each spending $250,000 to $300,000 daily, Tracey
said.

Their ads so far have been soft-focus efforts aimed at voters who hadn't
closely followed the primary fights to be the nominees of the Democratic and
Republican parties. They are likely to sharpen as the months pass, said University of Maryland communications professor Shawn
Parry-Giles.

There are limits to the TV business' political windfall. Stations are
required to offer presidential candidates advertising priced at their lowest
unit rate.

What's more, even though Obama will have a huge spending advantage, his
campaign will not be able to act quickly and buy all the air time since local
stations are required to offer equal time to both candidates, experts said.

posted on July 2, 2008 8:25 AM ()

Comments:

We all know how expensive advertising is and can only imagine what a campaign has to cost, but $800 million is absurd...and an insult to us who are struggling to make ends meet. We should do like some other countries do...allow an equal amount of campaign money for each candidate, each must spend only up to the amount that's equally allowed for the other. This keeps the cost from getting so ridiculous and gives each candidate an "even playing field". Maybe the person who wins won't be the person who just happened to have more money to spend...and maybe the best person won't have to drop out because of lesser funds.
comment by donnamarie on July 9, 2008 11:00 PM ()
It's kind of ironic that thses people spend all that money and still can stand up and tell us they can empathize with people that are languishing in poverty
comment by redwolftimes on July 2, 2008 10:59 AM ()
Lot of cash there,to me this is very wasteful.
All the money spend on this,could be better for something else.
You know what I mean.Obama is getting most of his money from
the Queen.McCain not sure where he is getting is,maybe from
wifie,she has a few buck.All in all a waste of money.
comment by fredo on July 2, 2008 10:38 AM ()
What a waste! Just think...that's $800 million that could go to kill more Iraqis.
comment by looserobes on July 2, 2008 10:37 AM ()
$800 million?!Wow, that could almost pay Cheney's medical bills...
comment by ekyprogressive on July 2, 2008 8:31 AM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]