Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
612,276
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
5 days ago
View All »

My Friends

11 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

Entertainment > Movies > "Little Women"--movie Review
 

"Little Women"--movie Review





I walked into the Classic Gateway Movie Theatre almost with a defiant attitude of "Show me!" as I have seen 3 versions, and read the book, of "Little Women". No way could anyone be prettier than Elizabeth Taylor in the 1949 version or Katherine Hepburn's strong, steadfast as Jo in the 1933 version or the realistic Jo of Winona Ryder in the 1994 film. After twenty minutes I was confused because the women we are seeing aren't 'little women', they are grown women.




This is the only way that the director/screenwriter Greta Gerwig missteps in both categories because at times it becomes confusing at moments--important moments, otherwise she has kept everything under control from the perfect cast to keeping all important parts of the book.



Most people reading this are familiar with "Little Women" either from previous movie versions or actually reading the classic book and if you aren't I don't want to spoil any of the film so on to the cast.





Saoirse Ronan, as Jo, projects a strong women of yesteryear and today and has scored her 4th Oscar nomination. Emma Watson as Meg, Eliza Scanlen as Beth and Florence Pugh, who won a best Oscar supporting actress nomination interact as sisters do while Laura Dern as their mother is warm, stern and her own woman. Meryl Streep is playing Maggie Smith's role from "Downton Abbey"!



Most of the men, except Timothee Chalamet who plays Laurie, and is prettier than Elizabeth Taylor or anyone in this film, captures the audience in a heartbreaking scene with Jo. Louis Garrel as a language professor in a few short scenes shows he can stand up to whatever is thrown at him. Chris Cooper, as Laurie's, grandfather, opens himself gradually until we get to know this intensely private human scene and Tracy Letts as Jo's first publisher and James Norton as Meg's husband support the women.



"Little Women" will take hold of you about 30 minutes into the film and hold on to you for the next 105 minutes.

posted on Jan 17, 2020 6:38 PM ()

Comments:

You have made me want to see it too. How could anyone be more beautiful than Elizabeth Taylor? I guess I will just have to see it.
comment by elderjane on Jan 18, 2020 2:11 AM ()
Charlize Theron is one of the great beauties and might give Elizabeth a run for her money!!
reply by greatmartin on Jan 18, 2020 9:32 AM ()
That's good to know. Some of my neighbor ladies want me to go see it with them, so now I can look forward to it.
comment by traveltales on Jan 17, 2020 8:39 PM ()
Not a curse word, viloent scene or a sex scene in the 2+hour movie--that is so rare today
reply by greatmartin on Jan 17, 2020 9:11 PM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]