Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
678,667
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

2 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

News & Issues > Together 23 Years, 2 Kids, a House--wonder Why
 

Together 23 Years, 2 Kids, a House--wonder Why

SAME SEX COUPLES WANT TO GET MARRIED? BE SURE TO READ SECOND STORY AND KEEP IN MIND THAT SOME PEOPLE ARGUE AGAINST SAME SEX MARRIAGE BECAUSE IT WILL COST MONEY!!! ANSWER? STOP DEDUCTIONS FOR ALL!!! DON'T LIKE THAT DO YOU????

Federal Judge Strikes Down DOMA


by Lisa Leff

Thursday Feb 23, 2012

Karen Golinski and her wife Amy Cunninghis
Karen Golinski and her wife Amy Cunninghis  



The
government cannot deny health benefits to the wife of a lesbian court
employee by relying on the 1996 law that bars government recognition of
same-sex unions, a federal judge has ruled.
In Wednesday’s ruling,
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White said the government’s refusal to
furnish health insurance to Karen Golinski’s wife is unjustified because
the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally discriminates against
same-sex married couples.
Golinski, a staff lawyer for the 9th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has been trying to secure spousal
benefits for her wife, Amy Cunninghis, since shortly after the couple
got married during the brief window in 2008 when same-sex marriages were
legal in California. Her boss, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, approved her
request, but the Office of Personnel Management ordered Golinski’s
insurer not to process her application.
After Golinski sued, the
Department of Justice originally opposed her in court but changed course
last year after President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder
said they would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act.
"The
Court finds that DOMA, as applied to Ms. Golinski, violates her right
to equal protection of the law ... by, without substantial justification
or rational basis, refusing to recognize her lawful marriage to prevent
provision of health insurance coverage to her spouse," White wrote in a
43-page decision that marks the third time in less than two years a
federal court has declared the act unconstitutional.
When White
heard the case in December, the head of the Justice Department’s civil
division, Tony West, joined her lawyers from the gay rights legal group
Lambda Legal in arguing on Golinski’s behalf, leaving the job of
defending DOMA to a lawyer hired by a House of Representatives group.
The lawyers representing the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group convened by
House Speaker John Boehner did not immediately respond to an email to
their offices sent after business hours Wednesday.
Former speaker
and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi issued a statement saying White’s
ruling demonstrated "that the House is not united in this case, that the
BLAG lawyers do not speak for Congress, and that BLAG’s intervention
remains a waste of taxpayer resources."
Wednesday’s ruling is the
latest in an unbroken string of judicial setbacks for the Defense of
Marriage Act, which Congress approved when states first started
considering allowing gay and lesbian couples to get married. The law
defines marriage as a union between a man and woman, and prohibits the
government from granting benefits such as Social Security and Medicaid
to same-sex couples.
A federal judge in Massachusetts, where
same-sex marriage has been legal since 2004, ruled in July 2010 that the
law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of a state
to define the institution. A year later, 20 of the 24 bankruptcy judges
based in Los Angeles ruled that the act violated the civil rights of a
married gay couple who were denied the right to file a shared bankruptcy
plan.
Last week, the Obama administration said it was extending
its decision to stop defending the law to issues affecting actively
serving military personnel and veterans in same-sex relationships.
In
ordering the government to allow Golinski to enroll her wife in a
family health plan, White rejected all of the arguments the House group
advanced in defense of DOMA, such as that it was necessary to foster
stable unions among men and women, and for Congress to act slowly on an
issue on which the public remains divided.
White’s decision
"acknowledges that DOMA violates the Constitution and that my marriage
to Amy is equal to those marriages of my heterosexual colleagues,"
Golinski said. "This decision is a huge step toward equality."
******************************************************************

Same-sex couples excluded from benefits of filing taxes jointly


6:30 PM EST, February 24, 2012











Advertisement

 



 
Each tax season long-time partners David Bloom and Damian McNamara come face-to-face with a double standard.
Even
though they've been together 23 years, have two kids and a house, they
can't file a joint tax return like married heterosexual couples.
McNamara has to pay taxes on his employer's contributions to Bloom's
health insurance.
Federal laws don't recognize same-sex marriage,
even as the number of states recognizing the unions grows. So McNamara
and Bloom and other couples are at a tax disadvantage to their married
heterosexual peers. They also face economic challenges when it comes to
health insurance, Social Security benefits, estate taxes and retirement
funds.
If Bloom and McNamara were legally married in another
state, their union would not be recognized under the federal Defense of
Marriage Act and Florida's Amendment 2
McNamara pays about $1,600 a
year in federal taxes for Bloom's health insurance. Their kids are
covered by McNamara's health insurance as any other parent's would be.
Each
year, the couple must figure out how to divvy up deductions on their
federal taxes, such as for their children and interest on their
mortgage.
"You learn how to adjust and how to deal with it," said
Bloom, who owns a PhysicalAdvertisingWorks.com, a promotions company
that operates in Broward and Miami-Dade counties.
In Lake Worth,
Robert Telford, who works for the city of West Palm Beach, said about
$200 in taxes is withheld from his paychecks every month to pay for a
portion of his partner's health insurance.
"I am feeling the bite
out of my wallet every month," said Telford, a broadcast coordinator,
who has been with his partner, Jim Schramm, for 17 years. "I could not
imagine those who make around $30,000 and want to provide this supposed
benefit to their partner. They couldn't."
Telford said he
struggling since he hasn't had a raise in four years and has to take
five furlough days without pay this year to help with the city's budget
woes.
Heterosexual couples who aren't married face the same
challenges, but they have the option of marrying and getting the tax
benefits afforded married couples who file one combined tax return.
There are more that 21,000 same-sex households in South Florida,
according to the 2010 Census.
Same-sex couples are not allowed to
file jointly. As a result, they can face thousands of dollars more in
taxes each year, said Gil Charney, a tax analyst with H&R Block
Inc.'s Tax Institute, the tax-prep company's independent research and
analysis division.
Take a married gay couple with two children. If
they claim two dependents, have combined salaries of $100,000 and one
of them files as a head of household and has the partner on an
employer-supplied health-insurance plan at a cost of $5,000, the
couple's tax liability will total $15,199, Charney said. But a married
heterosexual couple with two children, the same income and benefits
would have to pay only $10,656 on a joint tax return, Charney said.
"The whole tax code doesn't take into account the families created by gays and lesbians," said Rand Hoch, president of the Palm Beach County Human Rights Council.
The
benefits enjoyed by married heterosexual couples extend even into
death. Assets left behind by a husband or wife who dies are absorbed by
the surviving spouse tax-free, said Charney. But when one of two
same-sex partners dies, the surviving partner must pay taxes on the
assets above a certain exempt amount.
Now the federal estate-tax
exemption covers the first $5.1 million of a person's estate. Next year
the exemption is scheduled to drop to $1 million, according to the
Internal Revenue Service.
Retirement funds also are problematic,
Charney said. In the case of a heterosexual marriage, the individual
retirement account of a deceased partner automatically becomes the
property of the surviving spouse, who has the option of deferring
payments from the account until the survivor reaches 70-1/2 years old.
But in a same-sex partnership, the non-spouse beneficiary must start
withdrawals immediately, missing out on interest that could have
accumulated if the account had remained untouched.
Charney said
that ultimately means smaller retirement funds for surviving partners.
They also do not get Social Security benefits if their partners die.
"That's
a huge vulnerability," said Stratton Pollitzer who lives in North Miami
and is deputy director of Equality Florida, the state's largest civil
rights group for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.
Some
same-sex couples are choosing to check the "married" box on federal
income tax returns and file jointly instead of reporting their status as
single on separate returns, said Nadine Smith, executive director of
Equality Florida.
"The government should not be in the position to
make people lie about their marital status," Smith said. "This is money
that could go toward educating our children, buying homes, starting a
business."
Charney warned that a same-sex couple filing a single
federal return as a married couple could be liable for additional taxes,
penalties and interest — and could be subject to further scrutiny from
the IRS.
Filing separate returns is no guarantee that same-sex couples won't draw attention from the IRS.
Lesley
A. Northrup, dean of The Honors College at Florida International
University, had always split tax deductions and dividends on joint
investments with her partner.
"Oddly enough, after 15 years of
filing that way, the IRS for the first time last year questioned the
splitting of our mortgage deduction," Northrup said in an e-mail.
It was "quickly resolved with a copy of the statement listing us as joint owners, but [it was] still weird," she said.

posted on Feb 25, 2012 8:45 AM ()

Comments:

Having a partner in life if a person wants one can be beneficial in so many ways, our government should encourage stable same-sex unions just as they supposedly encourage heterosexual family units. I think employers who allow health benefits for domestic partners recognize this, but it's an uphill battle on other fronts.
comment by troutbend on Feb 25, 2012 1:24 PM ()
It seems heterosexual couples are afraid that same sex marriage will take away from their marriage which I really don't understand--I haven't heard of one heterosexual marriage end yet because of gay marriage.
I do remember one non-gay 'christian' say it will cost him too much money if gay are given the same equality!!
reply by greatmartin on Feb 25, 2012 1:51 PM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]