Laura

Profile

Username:
troutbend
Name:
Laura
Location:
Estes Park, CO
Birthday:
08/01
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Hotel - Hospitality

Stats

Post Reads:
442,546
Posts:
1942
Photos:
15
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

8 hours ago
5 days ago
21 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

This Oughta Be Good

Parenting & Family > Pets > Looserobes on Humans Vs. Animals
 

Looserobes on Humans Vs. Animals

We had the opportunity recently to see a movie in the theatre, a pleasure infrequently available due to the distance we live from the city where first-run films are showing. It was one of those multiplexes where a number of movies are being shown and we chose “True Grit.” It was a good and entertaining movie, notable primarily for the portrayal of Rooster Cogburn by Jeff Bridges. But of all the action and the various scenes depicted, the one that remained in my mind most predominantly afterward was the one, toward the end, where a good horse was run into the ground and then shot to end his suffering.

After seeing a fair number of human beings killed and their violent ends graphically depicted on the screen, as is done these days, it was only the poor horse’s untimely demise that saddened me and caused me psychological discomfort. Why was that? I found myself wondering. Was there something wrong with me that I would blithely perceive the deaths of humans with no emotional response, but blanch at the killing of a horse?

I decided, on reflection, that it was because the horse was a poor, innocent animal who had no say in what led up to his fate. The humans, with the power of thought and choice, had participated in the circumstances of their lives. The horse was incapable of evil, lived only to serve whatever human master rode him, thrived or suffered only according to the foibles of that master, who may be himself good or evil, kind or inhumane, according to his upbringing.

Animals are pure beings; humans are soiled, even the relatively good ones, by their ability to think and make selfish choices. Animals lack the capacity to be bad; humans, even the better ones, are often bad. Animals act according to their instincts; humans, though blessed with instincts themselves, often bring to bear upon these instincts their purely human weaknesses.

So I was shaken by the depiction of the horse’s demise. Perhaps, had there been “good” people murdered on screen rather than miscreants, I would have shuddered. But I don’t think so. The young heroine was snake bit and lost her arm, yet I never batted an eye at that. She chose, after all, to give chase, unlike the poor horse.

This is a lesson that I must learn to apply in my own life as I am forced to deal with my dog’s inability, when accomplishing his bathroom functions, to distinguish inside space from outside space. He lacks, I must remind myself, the benefit of a human’s high intellectual capacity. So I cannot just shoot him to end my suffering.

posted on Jan 30, 2011 9:47 AM ()

Comments:

comment by crazylife on Feb 1, 2011 8:56 AM ()
Bravo, Steve. Beautifully expressed, and I so agree!
comment by marta on Jan 30, 2011 9:38 PM ()
One thing I recall as a youngster going to church was a preacher telling us that animals did not have souls. It was just another falsehood to me then as it is now. There have been so many untruths told about animals, for instance, that they cannot perceive colors. This has been debunked by science so many times that I can't understand why some people still believe it. We are divinely charged with taking humane care of our co-earthlings.
comment by hobbie on Jan 30, 2011 7:35 PM ()
Have you ever seen that emailed joke about a debate between two churches (on their signs) about whether animals go to heaven?
reply by troutbend on Feb 3, 2011 9:02 PM ()
reply by marta on Jan 30, 2011 9:37 PM ()
Hi,Steve.No comment.
comment by fredo on Jan 30, 2011 1:21 PM ()
I feel as you do about the purity of animals and, particularly with pets, their unconditional devotion and love. I avoid movies where I know animals will be hurt or killed. Even volunteering at a shelter, that Ed and I have considered, would be an emotional trial for me as there wouldn't be enough of me to go around.
comment by tealstar on Jan 30, 2011 12:57 PM ()
That upset me too. I don't think it happened in the first True Grit. I
liked Jeff Bridges in the role better than John Wayne. He was so nasty
and realistic. We miss you.
comment by elderjane on Jan 30, 2011 12:16 PM ()
"Animals lack the capacity to be bad" He hasn't met Angel-Who-Isn't.
comment by nittineedles on Jan 30, 2011 10:58 AM ()
My comment is identical to Kristylyn - so a 'ditto' emoticon, would be handy to have here

comment by febreze on Jan 30, 2011 10:26 AM ()
I totally hear him on that... I always seem to care more about the fate of the animals than the humans, for the same reason! I know in movies it's all fake, but again I am with him that it's disturbing on a higher level when something happens to an animal.
I also am not a big crier while watching movies, but take me to one with an animal theme and I'll likely be balling.
comment by kristilyn3 on Jan 30, 2011 10:00 AM ()

Comment on this article   


1,942 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]