CJ Bugster

Profile

Username:
redimpala
Name:
CJ Bugster
Location:
Oklahoma City, OK
Birthday:
02/15
Status:
Not Interested
Job / Career:
Sales

Stats

Post Reads:
514,988
Posts:
1242
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

9 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

My Wild Dreams

Fashion & Style > Who Was Hot; Who Was Not at The Wedding (Part II
 

Who Was Hot; Who Was Not at The Wedding (Part II



Pippa Middleton,  Kate's gorgeous younger sister, almost stole the show from her beautiful sibling yesterday.  Eyes popped as the maid of honor entered behind Kate wearing a slim, white gown that mirrored some of the features of her sister's wedding gown. 
(White is often used for bridesmaids in royal weddings.  Grace Kelly's sister, who served as her maid of honor also wore white).  Kate Burton, who designed Kate's gown, also made Pippa's, which featured a daring plunging neckline as did Kate's, though not as much, as well as the same button features down the back.  Among those casting an appreciative eye toward Pippa was none other than Prince Harry.

 
But poor Princess Royal Anne.  The woman just missed out in both looks and fashion sense.  I would have reversed this outift with the jacket solid and the dress plaid.  It's too much.

 

Victoria Beckham, expecting her fourth child...finally a girl after three boys...wore one of her own creations. (She now has an upscale clothing line).  I don't care for the hat.  It detracts from the rest of her outfit.  But check out those shoes!  And I wish the woman would SMILE occasionally.  Her husband, David, respendent in a morning coat and top hat, is enjoying the moment.  Victoria, I'm not so sure about. 


 Prince Albert of Monacco arrived with his longtime fiance, Charlene Whitstock.  They will finally wed this summer.  Ms. Whitstock is a former Olympic swimmer.  She always displays impeccible taste, here dressed in a  simple morning coat and dress with a hat that does not detract from her outfit.

 

Zara Phillips, Princess Anne's only daughter, arrived with her fiance, Mike Tindall, a rugby player.  They also will wed in July of this year.

 

Now!  Here's someone else who got it right!  You may not recognize this Princess.  However, before she married the Prince of Windsor in 2009,, the son of the Prince and Princess Michael of Kent, she was a well-known British television actress.  I love the understated look of the navy with the hat serving as the daring perfect counterbalance.

 

Remember Diana's brother, now an Earl, who spoke at her funeral? Well, here are his three lovely daughters, all wearing Fascinators, the trend actually started by Kate Middleton of wearing hats featuring feathers or butterflies. I like these better than Beatrix and Eugenie's.  But then they are prettier girls.  That might have something to do with it also.


posted on Apr 30, 2011 9:02 AM ()

Comments:

No, I don't like most of THESE hats. They do not protect nor enhance the wearer. The simplest were the best. The others were ludicrous. You wonder what were they thinking. I like apparel that enhances the body including the head. They don't look like they belong on a head. I have worn hats but because I am small not many are made for me. I prefer not to look like a mushroom. Also, in this part of Florida, flip flops are formal wear.
comment by tealstar on Apr 30, 2011 6:40 PM ()




























































I think it is very difficult to find a hat that doesn't detract from the rest of an outfit. However, I think the young people, who all chose the "Fascinators" didn't really care...the more outrageous the better! And why not! They are young! They can get away with being "over the top"! It does remind one of the old Easter parades, doesn't it, where the wilder the better!


reply by redimpala on May 1, 2011 8:14 AM ()
I wonder how many channels those ladies can receive with that head gear???
comment by jerms on Apr 30, 2011 4:27 PM ()
I'm betting several!!
reply by redimpala on May 1, 2011 11:10 AM ()
Diana's brothers girls are gorgeous and look so very much alike. Who cares
about the hats, they are fun to look at. Victoria Beckham's husband is sooo good looking. Harry is not and Princess Anne has been working in her
garden too much. but Hey...let's just enjoy it all.
comment by elderjane on Apr 30, 2011 2:49 PM ()
Speaking of male looks, I hope Prince Albert of Monaco has a terrific personality.
reply by tealstar on May 5, 2011 8:23 AM ()
It has been fun, hasn't it? Yes, David Beckham definitely is better looking than his wife. He's VERY easy on the eyes until he takes off his jacket. His arms are completely covered in tattoos. Those Spenser girls are very pretty, and it is amazing how much they look alike.
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 3:56 PM ()
Yes stranger things have happened--especially among the British royals!
comment by greatmartin on Apr 30, 2011 12:57 PM ()
I could write a book! Come to think of it, books....several of them...have already been written about the antics of the British royals.
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 4:11 PM ()
Weighing in: Pippa is stunning. Anne missed the boat on all counts since, unfortunately, being born; I agree the outfit would have worked better if the coat was a solid color and the dress was the print. The actress who married a prince is lovely and so is her suit. Her hat looks like an alien space ship. Victoria Beckham's hat looks like a growth. Quick, call the medics. I will confess I was unaware of the tradition of over-the-top hats, such as in Easter parades. I am totally unimpressed with this skewed fashion. Since when is looking ridiculous when you are not in a Halloween parade, supposed to be trendy and wonderful? Out of all the hats I've seen, perhaps 3 are not totally gross.
And, of course, big, big hats are the province of tall, tall women. No petite woman in her right mind should ever wear even the loveliest of large hats.
comment by tealstar on Apr 30, 2011 12:56 PM ()
I get the impression that you just REALLY DON'T like hats. They are making a big comeback after falling out of favor for a number of years. A formal morning wedding does dictate a hat to be fashionably correct, however. I agree about Pippa. She is every bit as lovely as her older sister.
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 4:08 PM ()
I thought Pippa's dress was extra special, just gorgeous, especially because it complemented Kate's gown so beautifully. It was perfect for her figure. I love the tradition of English hats, and many were very lovely. A number were poorly chosen for the outfit and a few were just ridiculous, like Fergie's daughters. I got a kick out of Beckham's being corrected on the correct lapel to wear his MBE medal once he got in the church, and he switched it, but a British commentator said it was inappropriate to wear it at such an event. The whole thing reminded me of my trips to London and wonderful visits there. Very nostalgic for me.
comment by marta on Apr 30, 2011 10:32 AM ()
I loved Pippa's dress also. I was under the impression that medals are only worn on military uniforms, and I did wonder about his wearing the medal on the suit. Teal hated nearly all the hats; but they are protocol for a formal morning wedding.
The hatters in London must have loved it!!
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 4:04 PM ()
I would love to know why the Obama's werent invited, I noticed Arab dignitaries in the congregation (wearing their hear gear) and leaders of other nations...who was representing the US, do you know?
comment by aussiegirl on Apr 30, 2011 9:36 AM ()
The French President also was not invited. Neither of them was invited to the Swedish Royal wedding either. Only royalty are invited to royal weddings and the top politicians of the country.
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 3:59 PM ()
I heard--don't know how true--that only royalty was invited which would include Arab princes and Princesses--and then there is the assertion of the Right that because Michele touched Queen Elizabeth they were barred forever from England!!!
reply by greatmartin on Apr 30, 2011 12:55 PM ()
Okay, that's three, not two reasons.
reply by tealstar on Apr 30, 2011 12:48 PM ()
I have heard two reasonable explanations for not having the Obamas: 1. It is not usual for the President of the U.S. to attend a wedding that does not involve the head of state rather than one in waiting, assuming they skip over Charles (highly likely I hear). Obama sent his emissary, and that is considered correct. 2. If they ignored protocol and precedence, the logistics of security would have bankrupted the country. 3. The President had urgent matters to attend to here, such as storm devastation that has killed thousands.
reply by tealstar on Apr 30, 2011 12:48 PM ()
The guest list must have been a nightmare of logistics, but the wedding was not a British state occasion. The only heads of state in attendance were related to the royal family in some way. By the way, President Obama and the First Lady will be traveling very shortly to Britain on a formal visit, and will be treated royally.
reply by marta on Apr 30, 2011 10:04 AM ()
You right on Victoria Beckham.The hat did spoiled her look with the rest of the outfit.Wondering why they wear the hats that way.Is this a custom?
Tilted?who knows.Nice pictures there.Your doing a fine job.
What happened to Albert there.He looks so fat and roly poly.
He will never get married.Need to come out of the closet(my thought)
comment by fredo on Apr 30, 2011 9:19 AM ()
Yes, Albert is getting a bit roly-poly. I also have often thought Albert was gay. I think he is going to marry this summer, however. The invitations have gone out and the date has been set. I think they guy feels obligated to produce an heir.
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 9:23 AM ()
They could really be English if Harry married Pippa!!
How can Victoria smile when, to quote Streisand in Funny Girl, "The husband is so much prettier than the bride"
comment by greatmartin on Apr 30, 2011 9:16 AM ()
The marriage of Pippa and Harry probably will never happen. She has a steady boyfriend of three years. Stranger things have happened though. I agree! David Beckham is better-looking!!!
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 9:25 AM ()
Victoria Beckham is pregnant and wearing shoes like that???? Her husband wore his medal on the wrong side but who cares, right?
comment by aussiegirl on Apr 30, 2011 9:13 AM ()
She's a glutton for punishment! Medal on the wrong side? See, we Americans who have no royalty, didn't even notice!
reply by redimpala on Apr 30, 2011 9:26 AM ()

Comment on this article   


1,242 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]