Margaret

Profile

Username:
maggiemae
Name:
Margaret
Location:
Tillamook, OR
Birthday:
08/25
Status:
Married

Stats

Post Reads:
37,492
Posts:
113
Photos:
67
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

4 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Love As Much As You Can

Life & Events > Relationships > There's a Difference ...
 

There's a Difference ...

Many of us have collections of one variety or another. We may have walls, rooms, garages, shelves, or cupboards devoted to our objects of delight. Spouses might joke that our hobby or "obsession" is taking over the whole house. Relatives might also 'hint' that you need to pare it down. You may have real affection or attachments to each and every item, and the prospect of parting with any of it might cause you distress. Does that make you a "hoarder"?

No, not necessarily. Many people live very happily and comfortably with cherished possessions that have been carefully collected or preserved over a period of many years. They may be tokens of who we are, where we've been, or what we value. They might represent our personality, our sense of humor, our artistic sensibilities. These objects may have great value either cumulatively or individually. Perhaps there are good memories or associations attached. Or perhaps they are simply a fun pastime.

Just because a person has a collection that is more extensive than what most people would have does not mean they have a problem with hoarding.

So, where is the line between 'normal collecting' and 'hoarding'? Well, I'm no psychiatrist but I will attempt to illustrate where I think the line is using examples of people I've known and personal experience. It has to do with function, logic, relationships, and ability to use and enjoy what you have.

I have a cousin who is married to a collector. The entire basement of their house is dedicated to electric trains. When we visit, the whole family takes pride in showing off the train setup, which includes a small village, tree covered mountains, and special cubbies for various alternate models not in use. It is all very neat, tidy, and beautiful.

He also collects antique cars and related items such as gas pumps, license plates, old wheels, and whatever he happens upon that resonates with his passion for period vehicles. They have a second garage that houses this array. It is a joy to behold! There is a place for everything and everything is in it's place! both spaces are like a private museum.

Though some wives would not be willing to allocate such a monopoly of space to her husband's hobbies, my cousin is fine with it. Having adequate separate square footage to show and display his cars and trains makes it possible for her husband to do what he loves without impeding the functionality of the rest of the home or family. But it's a 'planned separation'. They bought the house with this purpose in mind.

All the other living areas are clean and clear and devoted to the business of everyday life. It appears that his collecting is an asset to the family. They all appreciate it's uniqueness and have no reservations about sharing it with friends.

I do not consider this man to be a hoarder for the following reasons. He has not disregarded the needs of the other people living in the home. Large spaces were designated by mutual consent. There are distinct boundaries which are consistently honored. There is order, both inside the house, and in the hobby areas. His collections have value, and do not impede functionality of the home or family. It's a source of family pride and enjoyment rather than embarrassment.

In a true hoarding situation budget, space, and boundaries are disregarded regularly. The needs and feelings of loved ones are not sufficiently considered. Items 'hoarded' usually have little value to anyone other than the hoarder. Communal spaces are over-run. Disorganization and disorder abound. Family members suffer shame and embarrassment. They feel powerless as all attempts to resolve problems are thwarted. Anger, blame, and resentments simmer. No one is enjoying it.




posted on Oct 7, 2012 5:49 PM ()

Comments:

Another key sign of a hoarder and not a collector is the remains of an animal or 12 within their stuff. But, unfortunately, true.
comment by whereabouts on Oct 8, 2012 3:05 PM ()
There was a dead cat amidst FIL's stuff. I recognized it as the cat he used to pet and love on when he was home. He claimed it didn't belong to him, but it apparently died on the premises. My husband remembers him saying something about it, and how he couldn't bring himself to bury it. He asked my husband if it was weird to leave the cat where he was. (Perhaps he was already dried up, as we had found him). I guess hubby didn't think that was weird cuz he was still here when FIL died. It looked like FIL would sit next to him and keep him company. Hubby couldn't bring himself to bury the cat either! I was embarrassed by that when the church people started helping me. The guys who helped me pull up the rug also burried the cat.
reply by maggiemae on Oct 10, 2012 7:12 AM ()
Hoarding is really nasty. A case in point was the state of the mansion,
Grey Gardens owned by Jacqueline Kennedy's relatives. The hoarding shows
detail such a mess that I don't see how anyone could find them livable.
Collecting is another matter entirely and I am sure my husband would
find your cousin's collections fascinating.
comment by elderjane on Oct 8, 2012 9:54 AM ()
I find it fascinating every time I go there! It's fun to visit. And it's not unlivable.

How sad, those relatives of Jackie, to have a mansion and render it unlivable.
reply by maggiemae on Oct 10, 2012 7:06 AM ()
not a hoarder, at least i dont think so--just have my 78 rpm record collection and a few things from when i grew up--more like memories
comment by kevinshere on Oct 7, 2012 8:52 PM ()
Nothing wrong with that! Enjoy!
reply by maggiemae on Oct 7, 2012 10:42 PM ()
Yup, there's a difference.
comment by jjoohhnn on Oct 7, 2012 6:59 PM ()
Yes there is.
reply by maggiemae on Oct 7, 2012 7:19 PM ()
You summed it up very well. There's a gray area, which I think of as the ineffectual collector that my husband falls into with all those Beanie Babies he bought in the 1990s because he and his aerospace buddies decided they were an investment. He acquired them, but doesn't really care about them enough to display them (heaven forbid) or take pride in them. Good news: I think I talked him into donating some of them to his sister to use as rewards for her second grade students.
comment by troutbend on Oct 7, 2012 6:29 PM ()
That sounds like a good use for them! He's not the only one who collected those for investment purposes. Who knows... about the time they've all given up on them...the value could shoot up.

(Shame on me for even thinking that!)
reply by maggiemae on Oct 7, 2012 7:23 PM ()
Freud would say that your cousin's husband's collecting is on such a scale that it is a substitute for sex. Perhaps your cousin is happy about that...
comment by steve on Oct 7, 2012 6:25 PM ()
Actually, I do remember my cousin telling me that she'd rather he be into trains and cars than other women, so perhaps Freud was onto something!
reply by maggiemae on Oct 7, 2012 7:24 PM ()
Hmmm... Don't know!
reply by maggiemae on Oct 7, 2012 7:13 PM ()

Comment on this article   


113 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]