Business >
Auto Makers' Bail Out
Auto Makers' Bail Out
Let me ask you something, if you were going to visit your rich uncle to plead poverty and ask for a monetary handout, would you drive up to his house in a brand new Rolls Royce?
Well, that’s pretty much exactly what the CEO’s of The Big Three U.S. auto makers did yesterday. The all flew to Washington D.C. in their multi-million dollar, 19-passenger corporate jets to request a $25,000,000,000 bail out for their companies.
Is anybody else struck by the hypocrisy of this?
One senator told the CEO’s that, if their companies were so badly off financially, they should sell these jets right now for a few million dollars and then fly back to Detroit on commercial airlines in coach class.
This is the mentality of American Big Business now-a-days! Isn’t that amazing??!!
How DARE these people give themselves $68,000,000 in individual bonuses one month, and then turn around and scream poverty the next month! The utter audacity of it! It truly boggles my mind!
Answer me this; why is it that Toyota is doing so well during this world-wide recession, and Ford and G.M. are about to go belly-up?
G.M. will tell you that the problem is the unions. That even though Toyota is building vehicles in the U.S. and pays U.S.-standard wages to it’s employees, it doesn’t have unions with which to contend.
In stating this, G.M. is insinuating that the unions are not ready to make concessions.
Really?
Does anybody remember back when Lee Iaccoca took over Chrysler a couple of decades ago? The company was on the verge of bankruptcy. Iaccoca laid his cards on the table with the unions and explained that if they didn’t make major concessions, their rank and file would be in the unemployment lines because the company would be out of business. He said something like, "I’ve got 100,000 jobs at $10-an-hour, and I’ve got zero jobs at $20-an-hour."
The unions saw the handwriting on the wall, and their members took lower pay-and-benefit packages to keep the company solvent.
Don’t you think they’d do the same thing today, especially since it is very apparent that the U.S. auto makers are about to go under unless major changes are made quickly?
However, if I were an employee of G.M., I would have a really difficult time making pay and benefit concessions while the bigwigs in the company were giving themselves salaries 100 times greater than I was receiving. (That’s not to mention all of the bonuses, stock options, and other benefits that they are receiving.)
The auto-makers' problems do not stem from the unions. They stem from corporate greed and poor business decisions.
While Toyota was willing to take less profits for a number of years as it went into development of the Prius and other hybrid vehicles, G.M. went full-bore into manufacturing gigantic, fuel-guzzling SUV’s because these vehicles were considered trucks and thus they had less stringent emission regulations. Therefore they were cheaper to build, and the profit mark-up on them was astronomical.
Tell me which company had the future in mind, and which one was short-sighted and greedy?
At the senate hearings yesterday, Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass) stated, "My fear is that you’re going to take this money ($25,000,000,000) and continue to make the same stupid decisions you’ve made for twenty-five years."
In my humble opinion, if these U.S. companies are now teetering on the precipice of financial failure, then so be it. Let them declare bankruptcy, rethink their poor business strategies, and restructure their organizations.
Or, let them push themselves over the edge and fall into the abyss. The foreign auto makers will then pick up market share, expand their operations and start hiring like crazy.
I don't know about you, but I'm sick of bailing out billionaires.
posted on Nov 20, 2008 7:31 AM ()
Comment on this article
402 articles found [
Previous Article ] [
Next Article ] [
First ] [
Last ]
Toyota is in the same markets and fighting for the same consumer dollars as is GM, Chrysler and Ford. So, how come Toyota is doing well, while GM, Chrysler and Ford are falling apart?
I contend the answer is that Toyota was much more far-sighted than the Big Three, and much less into short-term profits."
That answer is so easy it almost sounds like a conspiracy theory.
When Toyota and Honda first broke into the American market 40 years ago or so their marketing campaign was simple. They built smaller, cheaper, more reliable cars. Cars that would last people for 30 years, compared to the average life-span of 7 for an American car.
I'll say this plainly, EVERYTHING ABOUT A JAPANESE CAR HAS BEEN DONE IN AN AMERICAN CAR. There is NOTHING innovative, new, unknown, or secret in how those cars are built. They are not built with better materials, in better factories, or by smarter workers.
No. Their genius was in how long they were willing to wait before making a real profit. They weren't looking to compete with the big 3, they were looking to dominate the industry. And they knew they could not do that inside of 20 years. So for 5 years, Toyota and Honda sold nearly all of their vehicles in America a just a couple of points above cost. They made almost no profit. Why? They were positioning.
They created this perception that their cars were cheaper and they lasted longer, as long as you treated them right. Neglected by American auto makers was the response that EVERY car on the road will last practically a lifetime if you treat it like your baby and keep it maintained.
After Toyota and Honda had their foot in the door and they were gaining a percentage on the market, their prices started to come up. Slowly, but on the rise higher than inflation. It wasn't until the mid 80's that they actually hit the same profit percentages as the Big 3, and coincidentally, that is EXACTLY when they started to gain real ground on taking over the market. Now, they had the best of everything. They were making the same amount of money as the Americans, AND they had more than 20 years of an ingrained perception that they cars were better and cheaper, even though they weren't. But if you've been taught that your entire life, that's what you believe to be fact. You'll even hear some MECHANICS repeat that to you, even though if you question them on the differences between Toyota's, Honda's and American cars they will simply NOT be able to tell you what the difference is between them.
So hear we are today, and the highest selling Japanese cars are MORE expensive, not less, than their American counterparts. And the perception the American consumer has is, "Wow! This car must REALLY be great, because everyone KNOWS that Japanese cars are better and cheaper." That information is now hereditary. Fathers will pass it on to their cons when they go to buy their first car, and Toyota and Honda did their job.
I did not say that the American car industry were making sound business decisions, just that they responded to supply and demand. For a lot of years the SUV took the country by storm. And with gas prices being with 70 cents of what they were in 1980, it didn't matter that they had no mpg. What mattered is everyone wanted one, the next one, the bigger one, the longer one. The Big 3 put hybrids and compacts on the back burner to explore different versions, sizes and shapes of SUV's. And you got 3 different sizes of the same automobile (See Explorer, Expedition, and Excusion). Then you got the 'Sport' versions, which were smaller than the originals. The 'Track' versions with a small bed instead of a trunk.
So no, putting all your eggs in one basket is NEVER a sound business decision, but there was no possible way that the gas price explosion could have been predicted. And by the time the Big 3 responded to it, it was too late. Toyota and Honda were already in that space.
By the way, need verification on what I said here? See the Kia marketing strategy. They are trying to do to Toyota and Honda what they did to the Big 3, 40 years ago. How can they build cars which are virtually identical, some even built in the same factories, yet charge 20 percent less? It's the EXACT same thing, but we are forgetting what we already knew.