Laura

Profile

Username:
troutbend
Name:
Laura
Location:
Estes Park, CO
Birthday:
08/01
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Hotel - Hospitality

Stats

Post Reads:
482,997
Posts:
1942
Photos:
15
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

This Oughta Be Good

Life & Events > Meetings
 

Meetings

Today was a big day for the restoration of our river. The county designated an outfit run by goofballs to lead a coalition of government agencies and supposedly the landowners, but they treat us landowners like we're idiots.

Seven months after the flood, they finally had a meeting to talk about what needs to be done to make the river more resilient in future high water events. They explained to us that we had been in a big flood, and read Powerpoint slides to us that listed the sorts of damage experienced, but no photographs to define what they were talking about.

I would have liked to have seen pictures of post-flood damage and have an expert describe what caused that result.

For example, the floodwater came around the bend carrying sediment - sand and rocks the size of footballs. The bend slowed it down, and it lost energy so the sediment was deposited in the river, making a new island.

image

If the river channel ends up being very broad with lots of these islands, it's called a braided channel, and is not considered a good thing.

I learned all this by going to workshops, seminars and online research. Too bad these goofballs think we're all so dumb we didn't know we were in a flood, and wasted 2 hours of our time describing it.

posted on Apr 12, 2014 8:45 PM ()

Comments:

Oh my. That seems beyond ridiculous!!! But why are the islands bad?
comment by kristilyn3 on Apr 13, 2014 6:57 PM ()
The water is spread out and shallow where it runs around the various islands instead of being an integrated channel, so the fish don't have deep pools to stay cool in.
reply by troutbend on May 9, 2014 7:31 PM ()
I agree with Martin. That was so dumb.
comment by elderjane on Apr 13, 2014 6:48 AM ()
It's too bad, because we waited so long for this meeting. I kept hoping that once the consulting company was on board, the communication and outreach would improve, but apparently not.
reply by troutbend on Apr 13, 2014 10:28 AM ()
Oh did you have a flood???? As long as they get their weekly check, have their health care and get a good retirement pension what do they care?
comment by greatmartin on Apr 12, 2014 9:07 PM ()
People got up and walked out, even though we were initially promised this coalition was going to obtain funding for our river restoration projects.
reply by troutbend on Apr 13, 2014 10:27 AM ()

Comment on this article   


1,942 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]