Laura

Profile

Username:
troutbend
Name:
Laura
Location:
Estes Park, CO
Birthday:
08/01
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Hotel - Hospitality

Stats

Post Reads:
443,996
Posts:
1942
Photos:
15
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

12 hours ago
18 hours ago
6 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

This Oughta Be Good

Life & Events > Back to the Grind
 

Back to the Grind

I was able to forget about my troubles for a week, but now it's back to scheming and planning and dealing with adversity. The county where I live in Colorado, aided and abetted by FEMA (which is starting to look like the evil empire to a lot of people), has mailed damage determinations to the property owners, and we are trying to figure out how much it harms the value of our property if we don't appeal it.

The percent of damage the government says we have sustained is probably overstated. This hurts us in the long run because it is cumulative: if my little cabin is considered 40% damaged by this flood event, and another flood or forest fire comes along doing another 20% on top of that, I've crossed the 50% mark, and the government says that building is totaled and cannot be repaired, must be torn down, and no structure can replace it. Just imagine what that does to the property value.

It would make more sense if we could set the damage percent back to 0% by restoring the property to pre-flood conditions.

The numbers came from some FEMA software that is designed for other parts of the country, not our particular situation. They figure that any house that had flood water in it is automatically going to develop toxic black mold like happened in New Orleans. Our climate is so dry, mold hasn't been as much of a problem.

There's places like Florida that frequently have hurricanes and residents along the big rivers like the Mississippi experience flooding almost every year. Our floods are very rare - the last time there was anything near to this was 1976: it's a fluke, not a given.

We can appeal the determination, but it's a painful, expensive process, involving hiring appraisers and general contractors and notaries for sworn statements. I will first have to consult with my accountant and other experts to determine whether it's a fair damage assessment, and if not, get started on all that.

On a cheerier note, I'll celebrate Christmas here with the family before I go back.

image


posted on Dec 17, 2013 7:50 AM ()

Comments:

The cookie cutter approach to solving problems is maddening. Hope you do appeal and succeed. Informing bureaucrats is time-consuming, frustrating, and maddening, but not trying means you will lose what you have. Keep us updated.
comment by tealstar on Jan 8, 2014 6:52 AM ()
So sorry for your latest troubles. They just seem to keep coming, don't they?
comment by boots586 on Dec 19, 2013 4:23 PM ()
It is a learning experience for sure. We set up a Facebook group for the people in our small area to share ideas and news, and it has been very helpful. Even if it's bad news, at least it's news. Being in an unincorporated part of the county, we don't have the organized information sources that town people have so we have to keep track of what all the towns around us are saying about what the county is doing for what applies to us.
reply by troutbend on Dec 21, 2013 10:22 AM ()
Awful!
comment by jondude on Dec 18, 2013 8:25 AM ()
It's an interesting experience, for sure. One good thing is next summer the college kids from Nebraska who helped me in October want to come back and help some more. This time I can cook for them.
reply by troutbend on Dec 21, 2013 10:17 AM ()
Eloise looks adorable in her hat and scarf. When a bunch of bureaucrats get
their heads together there is a lot of ignorance and unreasonable things
that can happen.
comment by elderjane on Dec 17, 2013 2:58 PM ()
Even our local politicians are saying that FEMA doesn't understand how our laws for public/private road access work, so maybe there will be some help from that level, not just all on the individual citizens.
reply by troutbend on Dec 21, 2013 10:15 AM ()
Love the kitty...
Anddddd FEMA. From what you have said, I would agree with evil empire for you all.
comment by kristilyn3 on Dec 17, 2013 12:52 PM ()
The way flood insurance works changed just in the past few months, and it is going to be every bit as big a mess as health insurance is/was/will be, and of course FEMA is right in the middle of all that.
reply by troutbend on Dec 21, 2013 10:14 AM ()
"no structure can replace it.' That seems very odd--wonder why--any idea?
comment by greatmartin on Dec 17, 2013 9:51 AM ()
The government (federal, state, local) doesn't want people to build in a flood plain because we tend to look to them to rebuild the infrastructure (that we pay for with taxes and fees). Listening to a building department employee describe it, they consider destructive flooding a good way to clear non-compliant structures out of harm's way. In about a year, the county assessor will be whining about the loss of property tax revenue due to the lost homes and they'll want to raise taxes on the survivors to make up for it.
reply by troutbend on Dec 17, 2013 10:43 AM ()
I was wondering that too. If this judgement says that it's a danger spot for flooding, how can they decide that from 1 event?
reply by drmaus on Dec 17, 2013 10:21 AM ()

Comment on this article   


1,942 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]