Alfredo Rossi

Profile

Username:
fredo
Name:
Alfredo Rossi
Location:
Epsom, NH
Birthday:
05/01
Status:
Not Interested
Job / Career:
Skilled Labor - Trades

Stats

Post Reads:
365,960
Posts:
2383
Photos:
12
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

12 days ago
25 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Alfredo Thoughts

Life & Events > 'The Dark Knight'for Kids?
 

'The Dark Knight'for Kids?


First for me,yes I will have taken my grand children to see
this.It is not too dark for kids.What are we doing here?
Let them enjoyed the movie.
It is rated PG 13.Some violencece
Are these people for real.Get real Let them enjoyed it.
This is no worse than some of the animated cartoon that they
see on the screen.This is 2008.Lets us not go backward.
But this is up to them.
It was fun and funky.

That's the first thing you should know when your kids ask to see "The Dark Knight," this summer's biggest blockbuster. The film is vastly more true to Frank Miller's famous alternative view of The Batman than to the zap-pow camp of Adam West's TV portrayal and sanitized DC comics that filled our childhood.



So how do you answer? Should your children see "The Dark Knight?" We turned first to our resident film fanatic and visual designer, Chuck Kim, the first of the Yahoo! Kids team to see the box office smash.



"I would not take a kid to see 'The Dark Knight,' said Chuck. "The Joker and Two-Face alone could give a kid nightmares." The oft-mentioned violence is not of one of gore, he says, but more of the heart—and thus potentially more terrifying. "The main thing is that it is a very dark movie," Chuck concludes."There's no ray of hope for the city." He recommends kids be 14 or older to see the film.



Such cautions seem to be the consensus, beginning with movie's star, Christian Bale, who said this on the "Today Show:"



"It’s quite haunting. It’s something which will stay with you for quite a while afterward. I’m not sure how much a child will be oblivious to that. I would say starting at about 9, maybe 10 years old may be an appropriate age for kids to be able to deal with this.”



A sampling of other comments:



"'Dark Knight' is a staggeringly violent and disturbing film. Thought-provoking for adults, but potentially terrifying for children," says Jeffrey Weiss of The Dallas Morning News. "The PG-13 rating should offer some warning, yes. But this film dances just south of an R in my book."


"This film is not for children, and I would discourage parents from taking anyone under 12 to see this movie," writes Jim Pappas of The Trades.com. “'The Dark Knight' offers a glimpse into the darker places within each of us, which might be cathartic for some, but others will simply be afraid."


"The movie is sadistic, violent, disturbing and also one of the best and biggest movies of the year," according to MoviesOnline.ca. "That all said, 3 out of 4 of those components are absolutely not suitable for young children... regardless of how the MPAA rated the movie."


Ultimately, the "Dark Knight" decision depends upon you, your children and your relationships with them. There are children at age 14 (and I was one) who would be deeply troubled by the darkness of the film. And there are children of 10 who could not only face down the terror but even discuss some of the film's layered themes.



In all cases, we suggest talking with your children about "The Dark Knight." Be sure they understand that it is not a typical comic book movie and that it is intended for grown-ups. And should you permit them to see the film, we strongly recommend discussing it afterwards; our Common Sense Media review has some excellent starting points.

posted on July 21, 2008 2:47 PM ()

Comments:

I've heard it is very "dark" and I think I will choose not to see this one. I"m sure it's good, for those who like the trilogy... If they had thrown in Robin Williams... well, maybe I would have seen it then.
comment by cindy on July 22, 2008 9:15 AM ()
Hi - I'm Jill, Martin's friend and caregiver to his birds right now. I just phoned the hospital to check on Martin. The nurse said he is doing well and almost ready to have the breathing tube removed. Just wanted to let you know and if you have a way to let his other blogger friends know, that would be great. I was supposed to get a phone call today, but didn't so I got worried and called the hospital. Thanks. Jill jaw123@netscape.com
comment by jillsbirds on July 21, 2008 10:17 PM ()
Haven't seen it yet...am years behind on movies.
comment by elderjane on July 21, 2008 4:49 PM ()
My son is 9 and we went to see it this weekend. While there was some disturbing imagry, after the movie was over we were able to discuss it in depth. He said (seriously he suprises me sometimes) " I like this version better than the other batman movie with the Joker. I always thought Batman's best villian should be a match for him, not a silly guy who likes toys."

We went on to talk about the similarities of the movie to the Joker in the Batman comic "Arkham Asylum" specifically.

Maybe when people say it's not for kids they forget that if your children are in the room with you when you are watching the news they see a crazy man distroying our country already. And that's reality. As gripping and distrubing as some of the movie is, it's still fiction. Maybe we should start rating the news if we are really worrying about someone's delicate sensibilities
comment by ducky on July 21, 2008 3:39 PM ()
I'm glad I got a range of appropriate ages. When someone says "not for kids", I'm not always sure what that means. After all, one of my "kids" is 22 years old now,
comment by shesaidwhat on July 21, 2008 2:57 PM ()
That is one of the thing that I have really liked about this new version of Batman in the movies. It is really very similar to the real Batman comics.
AJ
comment by lunarhunk on July 21, 2008 2:51 PM ()

Comment on this article   


2,383 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]