They are trying to pass this bill.Totally stupid.
Gay and Lesbian along with couples spend more money to these people and they want to banned this.
Most people in this business are gay.
This is a very stupid bill.
You can bet your ass I will send off an letter to the editor on this BS.
Are they sick. Who spend the most money to the business here.
They can or will not back off.Does this come under Bully to the gays.
My blood boil on this.
Then they have another bill on the gay marriages pending.
We have very stupid people here.Stupid,Stupid,Stupid.They never do anything right.


Florists, caterers and other wedding-related businesses could turn away engaged gay couples under legislation before the House that opponents likened to segregation and Nazi Germany's race laws.

The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing yesterday on the bill, which would allow providers of wedding-related goods or services to withhold those services if they believe doing business with gay couples would violate their conscience or religious faith. The bill also would bar lawsuits against business owners in such situations.

Bill sponsor Rep. Jerry Bergevin, a Republican from Manchester, called it a "business protection bill" and said a person's personal religious beliefs should receive protection in his or her capacity as a service provider.

Noting that New Hampshire protects against discrimination based on both religion and sexual orientation, Bergevin asked, "How do you strike a balance between them?"

State Rep. Cynthia Chase, a Democrat from Keene, called the bill "codified discrimination" and the beginning of a "slippery slope."

"When you begin to codify things for one group, pretty soon it's okay for that group, and then that group," Chase said.

Although the bill was presented in reference to gay marriage, opponents said allowing a "person's conscience or religious faith," as the bill reads, to determine whom they serve would open the door to discrimination against interfaith and interracial couples, too.

"There are some religions that still believe that African-Americans and Caucasians shouldn't be able to marry. They would be allowed to discriminate against them under this bill," said New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Claire Ebel.

New Hampshire's gay marriage law already exempts churches and religious groups from being forced to officiate gay marriages or provide services, facilities and goods of any kind to participants. This bill would provide the same protections to individuals, which gay marriage opponents sought in 2009.

At the time, then-state Senate Democratic Leader Maggie Hassan of Exeter said she had heard of no legal challenges filed by gays over businesses refusing to provide services for their civil unions in the 17 months civil unions had been legal in New Hampshire. No cases were mentioned in yesterday's hearing either.

The committee has not issued a recommendation on the bill.

Another bill facing a vote in the coming weeks would repeal gay marriage and replace it with civil unions of any two adults, including relatives. It would also allow individuals to refuse their services for a civil union ceremony and to refuse to treat the civil union as valid if it conflicted with their religious or moral beliefs.