Martin D. Goodkin

Profile

Username:
greatmartin
Name:
Martin D. Goodkin
Location:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Birthday:
02/29
Status:
Single
Job / Career:
Other

Stats

Post Reads:
690,416
Posts:
6133
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

8 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Gay, Poor Old Man

Entertainment > Movies > The Light Between Oceans--movie Review
 

The Light Between Oceans--movie Review




The lead actors, Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander are beautiful, not only physically but in their acting ability. The photography of the scenery by AdamArkapaw, whether it be the New Zealand country or Tasmania or the ocean waves breaking on shore or the skies above them, are beautiful and in some scenes breathtaking. The music by Alexandre Desplat, never disturbs what is taking place on the screen and only underscores it. The direction by DerekCianfance, who also wrote the screenplay based on a book by M. L. Stedman's, on the surface says what a tearjerker it is, not to forget so many scenes of actors crying, but he never gets to what should be a major payoff of "The Light Between Oceans".

In many ways this film reminded me of old melodramas starring Bette Davis and Miriam Hopkins or Mary Astor. There is the pregnant woman having two miscarriages, a baby showing up in a rowboat with her dead father at an isolated lighthouse island, the couple decide to keep her, the real mother showing up 5 years later and tears, plenty of tears. Where the directors back then were accused of manipulating the audience and getting them to cry experiencing, in some cases, a catharsis, director/screenwriter Cianfance here only skims the surface of what is happening. 

As beautiful as the scenes of the country, water, sun, moon, lighthouse island, the town across the way are, there are too many of each making the movie last 132 minutes resulting in a rushed ending cutting off the emotions of the audience. There are too many voice-overs, too many letters spoken, distracting from the feelings of the actors.

There is much to like about "The Light Between Oceans"--see the first paragraph--but a lot more could have been acheived with a little more effort.

Movie Trailer

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3uULkvZh1w


posted on Sept 2, 2016 6:23 PM ()

Comments:

Although some of the movies in the 'old days' of let's say the 1970s, were often too long and the extra time didn't add anything, it seems we have swung the other way where the story-telling suffers from too much editing to keep it within a certain time constraint. Watching deleted scenes on DVD versions of various movies, I've often felt that the story would have been much more understandable if they'd been left in.
comment by troutbend on Sept 4, 2016 8:41 PM ()
Back in the old days--way before your time--they had double features and so the movies were shorter to generally fit in a 3 hour time frame for both movies---you would be surprised looking at the running times of classics like Casablanca, All About Eve, Double Indemnity, etc., and yet they were powerful---Gone With The Wind, Lawrence of Arabia were 'showcase' features with intermissions--today a lot of time is taken up with 'artistic' shots!!!
reply by greatmartin on Sept 4, 2016 9:19 PM ()

Comment on this article   


6,133 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]