Steve

Profile

Username:
steve
Name:
Steve
Location:
Someplace, UT
Birthday:
01/01
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Legal

Stats

Post Reads:
43,230
Posts:
118
Photos:
26
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

21 hours ago
6 days ago
15 days ago
20 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Loose Robes

Life & Events > Disturbing Photographs
 

Disturbing Photographs

Most murder cases, in real life, are not murder mysteries. The culprit is clear, the arrest takes place quickly, and the evidence is marshaled for ultimate presentation in court. Unfortunately, some of the evidence, such as crime scene photographs, can be disturbing. They are taken by hardened evidence technicians working alongside even more hardened homicide detectives. They spend their professional lives observing the depths to which humanity can sink.
I was prosecuting a defendant who had raped and murdered his 12 year old niece. At the time, my oldest daughter happened to be exactly that age, which made reviewing the scene photographs all the more difficult for me. Working with me at the time was a female law student who was doing a summer internship. She wanted to do more than just legal research. She wanted to participate as fully as possible in the preparation of the case for trial. She wanted to see the photos of the crime scene.
I attempted to dissuade her, to no avail. The case was spread out on my desk while I prepared my Order of Proof, that is, the order in which I would present the witnesses and evidence in court at trial. Are you sure you can handle looking at some grisly photos, I asked her. She assured me that she could. They’re in that manila envelope, I said, gesturing.
I returned to my work as she sat in front of my desk, pulled out the 8 x 10 photos, and started to peruse them one by one.
Suddenly I heard a low moan and looked up in time to see her passing out. She fell forward, her head slamming against my desk. She hit the floor with a distinct thud; she was not a small gal. I jumped up, raced around my desk, and there she laid, her dress having redeployed above her waistline.
She came to pretty quickly and her condition became one of acute embarrassment. Notwithstanding the whack on the head, all I could see was a red mark. The skin was not broken. As soon as she realized she was exposed from the waist down, she blushed so that the red mark on her forehead disappeared completely. She arose immediately.
The case of the murderous uncle had as a sidelight the case of the fainting intern. The defendant? Following his conviction as charged, he was sentenced to death years before I got the case. The crime had occurred in the late Seventies and, following a reversal by the United States Supreme Court for re-sentencing, I tried it in 1987. Again he was sentenced to death. The last time I looked, he was still incarcerated in what the State of Florida somewhat inappropriately refers to as Death Row.

posted on Feb 11, 2013 5:01 AM ()

Comments:

The graphic scenes of forensic investigation that have become common on shows like the CSIs are scenes I turn away from. Reality is okay but you don't have to wallow in it.
comment by tealstar on Feb 19, 2013 6:47 AM ()
Oh, I don't mind blood or autopsies. I can't stand the thought of the suffering the victim had to bear before death.
comment by nittineedles on Feb 12, 2013 10:41 AM ()
Definately not for the faint hearted to see actual photographs. the death penalty has been abolished here in all states. It astonishes me how a person can be on death row for years before his execution over there
comment by kevinshere on Feb 11, 2013 9:45 PM ()
They generally languish there for so long, if and when an execution actually occurs the murderer probably can no longer relate it back to what he did. Plus, the enormous expense of warehousing them for all that time.
reply by steve on Feb 12, 2013 7:05 AM ()
Poor child. Criminal law is not for the faint of heart.
comment by elderjane on Feb 11, 2013 8:05 PM ()
I think she realized that pretty quickly.
reply by steve on Feb 12, 2013 7:03 AM ()
I would not, could not view such photos.
comment by nittineedles on Feb 11, 2013 5:55 PM ()
Perhaps I ought not write about an autopsy...
reply by steve on Feb 12, 2013 7:03 AM ()
I have a point of law to consider, pro bono, of course. If I went to court to complain against an insurance company who denied a claim saying it was "an act of God," could I demand that the insurer prove the "act of God" only by proving the existence of said God?
comment by jondude on Feb 11, 2013 11:41 AM ()
"Act of God" in that context would probably be considered a "term of art," which is a word or phrase having a specific, precise meaning in a given specialty, apart from its general meaning in ordinary contexts. So "act of God" would be translated as "act of nature," such as a storm or some other natural disaster. Short answer: NO.
reply by steve on Feb 11, 2013 12:32 PM ()
Not a job for the faint of heart.
comment by jondude on Feb 11, 2013 6:35 AM ()
I think the intern decided to go into civil law...
reply by steve on Feb 11, 2013 7:01 AM ()

Comment on this article   


118 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]