Febreze (breezy)

Profile

Username:
febreze
Name:
Febreze (breezy)
Location:
Timperley, C5
Birthday:
02/17
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Maintenance and Repair

Stats

Post Reads:
94,129
Posts:
241
Photos:
2
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

17 hours ago
23 hours ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Another Metamorphosis

Arts & Culture > 'Old' St. Pauls Cathedral
 

'Old' St. Pauls Cathedral


When people think of ‘St. Paul's Cathedral’ in London. the image of Christopher Wren's magnificent classical church rises in their minds, but there was a cathedral dedicated to St. Paul long before the able Mr. Wren put his stamp on the skyline of 'Stuart London'.
The first church on this spot was erected in 604 AD, just 8 short years after the first Christian mission under St. Augustine landed in Kent. This wooden church was established by King Ethelbert of Kent as home to the first bishop of the East Saxons, ‘Mellitus’.
That first church was destroyed by fire, and rebuilt by St. Erkenwald, then bishop, in 675-85.
 Fire was not the only danger faced by buildings in those dark centuries of Anglo-Saxon England - the Vikings destroyed the ‘second’ St. Paul's in 962 during on of their periodic invasions!
Once again(!), fire destroyed the church in 1087. The new Norman building, now called ‘Old St. Paul's’, took over 150 years to complete - the final touches being applied in 1240. Well, not quite final touches - a new Gothic choir was added by 1313, making St. Paul's the third longest church in Europe at 596 feet. The following year the spire was completed. At 489 feet it was the tallest in all Europe.
In the Tudor period, an open-air pulpit called Paul's Cross was established by the south wall of St. Paul's. There, crowds gathered to hear rabble-rousing Protestant sermons.
 In 1549 the preachers incited a mob to sack the cathedral itself. They rampaged through the interior, destroying the high altar and ravaging the tombs, wall-hangings.
St. Paul's bad luck continued. The spire was struck by lightning (not too surprising, considering how it towered over the city).
 The cathedral became a centre of trade, with merchants selling their wares in the nave of the church itself. Architect Inigo Jones was called in to resurrect the decaying building, but his efforts, hampered by lack of funds, only delayed the inevitable.
During the English Civil War, Parliamentary troops commandeered the cathedral and used the nave as cavalry barracks. They broke up the scaffolding and sold the material.
The fortunes of Old St. Paul's seemed to take a turn for the better with the ‘Restoration of the Monarchy’ in 1660. Charles II appointed a young architect named ‘Christopher Wren’ to undertake major repairs to the building. Wren had only begun his work - when final calamity struck!
On September 4, 1666, fire broke out in a bakehouse in Pudding Lane. Fanned by a fierce wind, the fire spread through the close-packed wooden structured streets of London, destroying everything in its path.
For four days the fire raged, and when the smoke finally cleared, Old St. Paul's was nothing but charred timbers and rubble . . . .
 

posted on Jan 21, 2011 1:26 PM ()

Comments:

I hate destruction but as troutbend said people were more civilized than
we ever thought in that era.
comment by elderjane on Jan 23, 2011 6:50 AM ()
It was the period people refer to as 'The Dark Ages'. I don't know who, first coined this phrase, but it has been around for many a year. We now know, it wasn't 'a dark age' at all.
After the Romans had left these shores, some 190 years before, they left a 'Romano Briton' civilization, who had learned 'trades' of varying descriptions, from the Romans - (all be it as 'slaves' to them - because that is how 'Tacitus' the Roman scribe, described our domination, as).
Before the Roman invasion, we, were Iron - Age 'farmers'. We 'were' civilized in as much as tending small agricultural holdings, well fenced and obviously 'protecting' their homes and land from marauding tribes from other areas. Yes, there were localized 'feuding', but when 'push came to shove' (when the Romans invaded) they 'stuck together', as any nation would.
Once the Romans left, another filtration of peoples arrived in the form of The Angles, The Saxons and The Jutes. Most archaeologists now believe that these peoples came here 'by invitation', not as a conquering horde, as there are no archaeological signs of any 'squirmishes, to show differently. Eventually, The 'Vikings' were on their way - this is another, story . . .!!!!!!!

reply by febreze on Jan 23, 2011 7:43 AM ()
Let us not get carried away.
How about wine or chocolate
comment by fredo on Jan 22, 2011 12:59 PM ()
ooohhhhHHHH . . . . chocolate . . . . .

reply by febreze on Jan 22, 2011 4:44 PM ()
Sorry,to hear about that.Take care and wash your hands.
This is interesting.If you know this all ready.
After blowing your nose,should washed your hand right away.
As they are many bacteria lurking in your nose.
I found this interesting and never knew about this.
Guess in anything,the most important thing is to washed the hands.
Hope this will not last too long for you.Take care.
comment by fredo on Jan 22, 2011 6:16 AM ()
Trust me Fredo, I do. I do not, want to catch any 'Swine flu or anything of that 'ilk' - I almost bathe in disinfectant

reply by febreze on Jan 22, 2011 10:49 AM ()
It's hard to imagine there being much civilization in 604 AD, building churches and all. And Ethelbert and and Erkenwald are funny names, nobody's rushing to saddle their kiddies with those.
comment by troutbend on Jan 21, 2011 8:06 PM ()
We have got the girls name 'Ethel' and the boys name of Edward - which is corrupted down to 'Bert' - that is quite common in London - even nowadays. 'Erkenwald', I'll 'pass' on
Briton (old spelling), has had a population far, longer than 604 AD. When you think about it, in 410 AD, the Romans had left Briton after being here since 43 AD - and prior to that, the country had been divided into the 'tribes' of Briton going waaayyyyyyy back - centuries before 'Christianity'!
Archeology, has provided proof of civilization from the last ice-age to 'now'!
They (the archaeologists) are digging up prehistoric settlements, basically, 'all the time' - it is amazing! I love it, when they un-earth the 'cooking vessels' for instance, that were last used when wild animals, long extinct, roamed freely - I am totally awestruck!

reply by febreze on Jan 22, 2011 10:45 AM ()
Thank you for the post there and it was interesting to hear the Birdman.
Oh!all right.I will behave
comment by fredo on Jan 21, 2011 1:45 PM ()
I'm glad you liked it Fredo - there will be more of the 'birdman' tomorrow (can't do any more right now, I have got a touch of 'flu, so I am going to bed).

reply by febreze on Jan 21, 2011 3:35 PM ()
The Birdman again.That was a sad note there.I believed that this was before my time.
comment by fredo on Jan 21, 2011 1:44 PM ()
Don.t be despondent, it arose once more (yep, it was a bit before us)

reply by febreze on Jan 21, 2011 3:31 PM ()

Comment on this article   


241 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]