Vladimir

Profile

Username:
vladimir
Name:
Vladimir
Location:
Austin, TX
Birthday:
10/31
Status:
Not Interested

Stats

Post Reads:
29,965
Posts:
60
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

23 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

V L A D I M I R

Politics & Legal > How I See Espionage
 

How I See Espionage

This issue pisses me off when some people won't look beyond partisanship. They're too hung up on this "my team" versus "your team" turf battle bullshit to comprehend the big picture.

I. ESPIONAGE IS NOT ABOUT POLITICAL PARTIES.

Espionage is NOT about politics or political parties. Espionage is about other nations looking for advantages against other nations through the theft of secrets to cause physical, cultural, economic, and other damage.

A nation spying against ours doesn't give a fuck which party is in office. Their target is America and the American people. That alone should be good enough for people to not try to play politics with security breaches, but apparently that won't stop some hacks from trying.

The latest Chinese spying scandal isn't the first and it won't be the last. Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Wainstein made it very clear when he announced charges today, "It's a threat to our national security and to our economic position in the world, a threat that is posed by the relentless efforts of foreign intelligence services to penetrate our security systems and steal our most sensitive military technology and information."

This threat is neither recent nor trivial. The Chinese were after our secrets in the previous administration, the administration before that, and so on. They will continue to spy on this nation in the next administration, too. Just as there have been indictments for spying in this and previous administrations there will be indictments for spies whether they're in the public or private sector. The threat to our national security will not vanish because one party or the other is in power, neither will that influence the career government workers -- WHO ARE NOT POLITICAL OPERATIVES -- entrusted with catching spies and preventing espionage.

II. ESPIONAGE IS NOT SIMPLY A MATTER OF CONTRACTORS VERSUS GOVERNMENT PAYROLL.

Security clearance protocols are IDENTICAL between government employees and contractors. Contractors have more consequences: if your company is involved in a breach, you face sanctions and possibly prosecution, and your contract can be terminated. When government employees are involved in spying, you don't sue the government, you don't end the government's contract, you don't have any recourse.

Some of the worst cases of espionage -- such as Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen -- have involved government rather than contract workers. The latest charges include a weapons systems policy analyst at the Department of Defense named Gregg W. Bergersen.

If protocols are being followed, the problem usually boils down to one of a couple things. Either an ideologically-committed employee with clearance may participate in another country's attempt to access information or someone's greed overrides one's trust and duties.

The former is what happened in the Pollard case (another government employee). Jonathan Pollard was more ideologically-committed to Israel than to the US and turned over classified information. The latter occurs more frequently, and is what led Robert Hanssen to betray our country.

Neither of those scenarios is tied directly to domestic politics. Our policy towards Israel has been very friendly yet they spy on us and were able to find someone willing to betray the US even during an administration especially cozy to Israel. Greed will continue regardless of which party is in control -- other countries will always find greedy people who have a price at which they'll betray trusts.

CONCLUSION

It's not about domestic politics, and it's not about contractors.

Ben Franklin told the Continental Congress, "We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately." In other words, stop being a goddamn partisan long enough to see this issue for what it is -- an attack on our nation. It's an attack that transcends domestic politics. At least it should. There's plenty of room to fight about just about every other issue, but this isn't the fight you want. Because the next administration -- Democrat or Republican -- almost certainly will face the same fucking adversary on the same fucking grounds because that adversary isn't fucking around. So why are you?

posted on Feb 11, 2008 6:28 PM ()

Comments:

Don't yell! i think it is a necessary evil :0(
comment by mmmhollywould on Feb 11, 2008 11:19 PM ()
Wow, did I do that...Was it the story that riled you up, or my presentation of it?

you said.."The threat to our national security will not vanish because one party or the other is in power"... that is true, I agree. Romnut, cheney and the rest don't, calling a vote for democrats a vote for the terrorists and other such hooplah. But yes, this is an issue that both parties have and will continue to fight with for years. My issue, was that in contracting out sensitive "infrastructure" issues (targeting equipment, satellite systems, information technology, ect) to external countries we are opening ourselves up like never before. This belief in the "free market" and its "ok to outsource EVERYTHING" is dangerous when critical infrastructure issues and defense issues or intelligence gathering is the things being outsourced. Yea, cancel the contract, but the damage is done, and it will take LOTS of money and time to fix, if it can be fixed (that regarding intel. issues, contacts & trust issues)

"Contractors have more consequences: if your company is involved in a breach, you face sanctions and possibly prosecution, and your contract can be terminated."....Not in today's environment. Contractors have been caught doing horrible things, and no punishment has been given. This includes weapon smuggling to Iraq (Blackwater), the Boeing issue, CACI interrogations, just to name a few. No recourse. Laws even to prevent recourse. Paul Bremer's "order 17" is a prime example of that one for blackwater.

"When government employees are involved in spying, you don't sue the government, you don't end the government's contract, you don't have any recourse.".....Its called treason I thought...

The Pollard issue reminds me of Feith (sp?)and what happened with him lately...

But what I am saying, is when your party's platform puts its Ideals of a "corporate free market" over national security, then yes, domestic politics come into play. That IS placing political partisanship above the nation, rather you agree or disagree with their position, surely you can see that. Not my side starting it, just pointing it out..
comment by ekyprogressive on Feb 11, 2008 7:15 PM ()

Comment on this article   


60 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]