James M.

Profile

Username:
ekyprogressive
Name:
James M.
Location:
Lewes, DE
Birthday:
04/14
Status:
In A Relationship
Job / Career:
Nurse

Stats

Post Reads:
85,344
Posts:
298
Photos:
20
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

5 hours ago
6 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Eastkyprogressive_2

Politics & Legal > Regarding Ayers & Obama Non-ties. New Look ...
 

Regarding Ayers & Obama Non-ties. New Look ...









Now, IMO, like with this war, the troops are not faulted for what they were forced to do by the civilian leadership of today or of that time. But that being said, I found this view insightful. Here is a post from the blog of the man speaking, Ron Kuby...

Doing Time! Palin Reads The New York Times


By Ron Kuby



Sarah Palin went from being unable to articulate a single source from
which she receives her news, to quoting the New York Times, all in a
single week. The article that allegedly drew Palin's attention was a
lengthy piece in Saturday's Times which explored the connections (and
lack thereof) to Barack Obama and Weather Underground leader Bill
Ayers. It was on that basis that Palin claimed that Obama was "palling
around with terrorists" (false), and that this issue has not been
addressed before (also false).

Now I know Bill Ayers and his family, so maybe I
should be recused from this blog. Oh, this is the new journalism--there
are no recusals. Okay. I'll continue. While John McCain was killing
Vietnamese in a country that did not attack us and posed no threat to
us, Bill Ayers was engaged in the symbolic destruction of property in
an effort to end the war. I know the Obama campaign won't say this--and
cannot say this because America's warriors are sacrosanct, no matter
how wrong the cause for which they fought or how horrific their actions
in fighting for that cause. We killed a million Vietnamese during that
war, Bill Ayers killed no one. Yes, Virginia, American soldiers did
kill babies, too. Bill Ayers did not. Bill Ayers, and many others,
threw away their chances to succeed in American politics because of the
overriding need to do something, to do almost anything, to stop the
war. Barack Obama was eight years old at the time. Barack Obama never
expressed any sympathy for Ayers' actions, nor has he weighed in (as he
could have in the first debate), as to Vietnam being a classic example
of wars we should not fight (too bad).

Ayers went on to become a respected educator and
lecturer on educational reform around the country. His meetings with
Obama were fairly irregular and focused on educational initiatives of
which both were members
. I genuinely believe that as the American
people look toward a dismal economic and environmental future, the
question of whose acquaintances did what in the 60s is not high on
anyone's list. But it is the last card that McCain has to play.

For us, as progressives, it is at least worth
remembering those who fought to stop an immoral war, and to think of
those who participated in one.

And for a final thought, I found this comment to this post a great one...

If Ayers is branded as a terrorist can we brand Todd Palin



a traitor for advocating Alaskan secession?
The last time that happened we ended up with 4 years of war and over 600, 000 dead.



posted on Oct 6, 2008 4:27 PM ()

Comments:

Interesting to read
comment by itsjustme on Oct 7, 2008 7:57 AM ()
Listen, there's no story here, Obama was 8 when this guy was
with the Weather Underground. During this period of time he worked with
him to improve Chicago Schools, so did other Republicans and Democrats.
I heard on NPR a Republican saying the same thing and it sickens her to see
this association from Palin and the Keating 5 response. So all the Obama
campaign had to do was point this out and it's over. The tactic of McRove has been to paint Obama as not one of us...and today we've seen the repeat performance to once again do that and to change the conversation away from
economics...the McCain Campaign said, if this election continues to be on
economics...they lose. If Obama is smart, he swats this down and focuses on economics that McCain remains clueless on. Barack will clean his clock again tomorrow...
comment by strider333 on Oct 6, 2008 5:30 PM ()

Comment on this article   


298 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]