Panel finds widespread Gulf War illness

11/16/08
ANNE USHER/Cox News Service
Respond to this story
Email this story to a friend

WASHINGTON - At least one in four U.S. veterans of the 1991 Gulf War suffers from a multi-symptom illness caused by exposure to toxic chemicals during the conflict, a congressionally mandated report being released Monday found.

For much of the past 17 years, government officials have maintained that these veterans -- more than 175,000 out of about 697,000 deployed -- are merely suffering the effects of wartime stress, even as more have come forward recently with severe ailments.

“The extensive body of scientific research now available consistently indicates that ’Gulf War illness’ is real, that it is the result of neurotoxic exposures during Gulf War deployment, and that few veterans have recovered or substantially improved with time,” said the report, being released Monday by a panel of scientists and veterans. A copy was obtained by Cox Newspapers.

Gulf War illness is typically characterized by a combination of memory and concentration problems, persistent headaches, unexplained fatigue and widespread pain. It may also include chronic digestive problems, respiratory symptoms and skin rashes.

Two things the military provided to troops in large quantities to protect them -- pesticides and pyridostigmine bromide (PB), aimed at thwarting the effects of nerve gas -- are the most likely culprits, the panel found.

The Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses, created by Congress in 2002, presented its 450-page report to Secretary of Veterans Affairs James Peake on Monday. It said its report is the first to review the hundreds of U.S. and international studies on Gulf War vets since that have been conducted the mid-1990s.

In a 2004 draft report to Congress, the panel said that many Gulf veterans were suffering from neurological damage caused by exposure to toxic chemicals.

The new report goes further by pinpointing known causes and it criticizes past U.S. studies, which have cost more than $340 million, as “overly simplistic and compartmentalized.”

It recommends that the Department of Veterans Affairs order a re-do of past Gulf War and Health reports, calling them “skewed” because they did not include evaluations of toxic exposure studies in lab animals, as Congress had requested.

The panel examined such tests and noted that recent ones -- unethical to carry out on humans - have identified biological effects from Gulf War exposures that were previously unknown.

While it called some new VA and DOD programs promising, it noted that overall federal funding for Gulf War research has dropped sharply in recent years. Those studies that have been funded, it said, “have little or no relevance to the health of Gulf War veterans, and for research on stress and psychiatric illness.”

“Veterans of the 1990-1991 Gulf War had the distinction of serving their country in a military operation that was a tremendous success, achieved in short order. But many had the misfortune of developing lasting health consequences that were poorly understood and, for too long, denied or trivialized,” the committee’s report says.

The report also faults the Pentagon, saying it clearly recognized scientific evidence substantiating Gulf War illness in 2001 but did not acknowledge it publicly.

It said that Acting Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Gulf War illnesses Lt. Gen. Dale Vesser remarked that year that although Saddam Hussein didn’t use nuclear, biological, or chemical agents against coalition forces during the war -- an assertion still debated -- “It never dawned on us ././. that we may have done it to ourselves.”

“We know that at least 40,000 American troops may have been overexposed to pesticides,” Vesser said, adding that more than 250,000 American troops took the small, white PB pills. “Both of these substances may (be) consistent with the symptoms that some Gulf War veterans have.”

The panel is urging Congress to spend at least $60 million annually for Gulf War research. It notes that no effective treatments have yet been found.
https://news.mywebpal.com/partners/680/public/news936004.html
continues.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Agent Orange - The Time-Release Poison Pill
By Paul Cox

"It is not impossible that our country has dropped a delayed-action bomb that will reverberate on the affected populations with consequences that will only be possible to evaluate in a distant future."

Senator Gaylord Nelson almost had it right in 1970: Agent Orange (AO) is indeed a delayed-action bomb. But instead of exploding once, it has been exploding continuously in the bodies of more than 3 million Vietnamese and tens of thousands of US and other veterans since it was dropped on nearly 1/8 of the landmass of Vietnam during the American War. It, or more specifically, the dioxin contaminant that was manufactured into it, is a poison that attacks the immune system, organs, cellular genetic code, and fetal development.
On February 22, 2008, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit by the Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/dioxin (VAVA) against 37 chemical manufacturers that made herbicides for the US military and profited tremendously from their contracts.

The lower court that had originally dismissed the case was presided over by Jack Weinstein, the same judge that rammed through the out-of-court settlement in 1984 of the first Agent Orange/dioxin suit brought by US veterans. That settlement for $180 million was spent within 10 years, leaving tens of thousands of veterans who were not yet sick with dioxin poisoning without access to the settlement. The largest cash payout to any of the individual plaintiffs was a lame $4,000. However, the Veteran's Administration (VA) began recognizing a few illnesses in veterans related to AO, and has gradually expanded the list to a suite of diseases that are presumptively caused by AO if the veteran served in Vietnam. Currently the VA expends about $1.5 billion annually on AO-related illnesses to veterans in direct medical care and disability payments.

So, when those Vietnamese who have been suffering from AO poisoning for 30 years decided in 2004 to file a suit in US Courts against the chemical companies, it was reasonable to think that they would have gotten an honest hearing. Judge Weinstein had, as a part of the 1984 settlement, retained jurisdiction of all subsequent AO-related lawsuits, presumably because he was already familiar with the scientific basis and legal landscape for AO/dioxin issues. However, it was clear from the beginning of the case that he was hostile to the suit. He stated that AO was not a poison and that the original suit had been settled due to political and economical reasons, not because there was any scientific evidence that AO actually hurt anyone. Ultimately, he sided with the chemical companies and the US government and dismissed the Vietnamese suit and two others brought by US veterans.

The dismissal forced the plaintiffs in all three suits to appeal that decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. The entire appeal for all three suits was heard in one day in June 2007 by a three-judge panel and was accompanied by demonstrations of support for plaintiffs in several cities around the country.

In its decision, the Appeals Court bobbed and weaved on matters of domestic and international law, ultimately coming to the conclusion that domestic laws were not violated because claims were barred against government contractors. This may sound familiar as the same argument that has been made to let the phone companies aid the "intelligence community" in widespread and uncontrolled wiretapping of US citizens. The Appeals Court also ruled that VAVA had not proven a "violation of international law because Agent Orange (AO) was used to protect the troops against ambush and not as a weapon of war against human populations."

It apparently does not matter to the courts that – thirty-seven years after spraying stopped in Vietnam – AO contamination is massively devastating to the people of Vietnam, to veterans of that war from the US, Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, and to people in Canada whose communities were contaminated by its testing.

More than three million Vietnamese suffer today from illnesses and birth defects, and hundreds of thousands of war veterans from these other countries are ill from dioxin poisoning. Yet the court accepted the argument that since the US has always maintained that AO was not a chemical weapon, it is not a chemical weapon. Finely-tuned legal language cannot hide the crime. Veterans For Peace (VFP) members may remember the delegation of Agent Orange victims who attended the June 2007 hearing on the appeal. Two of those people – Nguyen Thi Hong and Nguyen Van Quy – have already died due to cancer from Agent Orange exposure. How many others must die before justice is done?

Left unexamined is the smoking gun that the chemical companies knew their products contained dioxin poisons, and yet, chose to forego slower manufacturing methods that would remove the dioxins. After all, the military had an open-ended order to buy all the AO the chemical companies could get, and there were profits to be made.

The appeals court decision has prevented the Vietnamese victims from getting access to company and government files that undoubtedly would yield additional revelations about the collusion between the chemical companies and the government. The court's companion decision also upheld the dismissal of the two suits by US veterans who got sick after the 1984 settlement with the chemical companies.

All is not lost, however. There is a growing awareness in this country of the damage AO/dioxin has done, of the lies and treachery of the US government and the chemical companies, and of citizen's responsibility to take responsible action even if our government won't. Late last year the American Public Health Association passed a strong resolution calling for the government and chemical companies to allocate resources to help the Vietnamese victims and US veterans, and to take action to remedy the damage to the environment in Vietnam.

VAVA will now take their fight to the full Court of Appeals and, if necessary, to the Supreme Court, where, after additional years of delay, they will get additional cracks at justice from our court system. In the meantime, organizations that support justice for Vietnamese victims are beginning the process of pushing Congress to provide compensation for the victims and remediation of the environmental damage and bringing public pressure to bear on the manufacturers of Agent Orange. VVAW, along with other veterans groups, can play an important role in this campaign. When the time comes to push for legislation, we will need to mobilize across the country to lobby our congressional delegations to support it. In the meantime, a hearing on the AO problem has been set for May 15, 2008, in the House. Please call your Representative to urge them to attend. The primary support organization in the US for VAVA's fight for justice is the Vietnam Agent Orange Relief and Responsibility Campaign (VAORRC). Their website is packed with information and documents related to this struggle. The full text of the court decision, VAVA's statement, and VAORRC's press release can be found at the VAORRC website at: www.vn-agentorange.org/index.html

Paul Cox served as a Marine in Vietnam from 1969 to 1970 and is a member of VVAW.
He is on the national board of the Vietnam Agent Orange Relief and Responsibility Campaign.
https://www.vvaw.org/veteran/article/?id=842