
Retailing Chains Caught in a Wave of Bankruptcies
Published: April 15, 2008
The consumer spending slump and tightening credit markets are unleashing a
widening wave of bankruptcies in American retailing, prompting thousands of
store closings that are expected to remake suburban malls and downtown shopping
districts across the country.
Since last fall, eight mostly midsize chains — as diverse as the furniture
store Levitz and the electronics seller Sharper Image — have filed for
bankruptcy protection as they staggered under mounting debt and declining
sales.
But the troubles are quickly spreading to bigger national companies, like
Linens ‘n Things, the bedding and furniture retailer with 500 stores in 47
states. It may file for bankruptcy as early as this week, according to people
briefed on the matter.
Even retailers that can avoid bankruptcy are shutting down stores to preserve
cash through what could be a long economic downturn. Over the next year,
Foot
Locker said it would close 140 stores, Ann Taylor will start to shutter 117,
and the jeweler Zales will close 100.
The surging cost of necessities has led to a national belt-tightening among
consumers. Figures released on Monday showed that spending on food and gasoline
is crowding out other purchases, leaving people with less to spend on furniture,
clothing and electronics. Consequently, chains specializing in those goods are
proving vulnerable.
Retailing is a business with big ups and downs during the year, and retailers
rely heavily on borrowed money to finance their purchases of merchandise and
even to meet payrolls during slow periods. Yet the nation’s banks, struggling
with the growing mortgage crisis, have started to balk at extending new loans,
effectively cutting up the retail industry’s collective credit cards.
“You have the makings of a wave of significant bankruptcies,” said Al Koch,
who helped bring Kmart out of bankruptcy in 2003 as the company’s interim chief
financial officer and works at a corporate turnaround firm called AlixPartners.
“For years, no deal was too ugly to finance,” he said. “But now, nobody will
throw money at these companies.”
Because retailers rely on a broad network of suppliers, their bankruptcies
are rippling across the economy. The cash-short chains are leaving behind tens
of millions of dollars in unpaid bills to shipping companies, furniture
manufacturers, mall owners and advertising agencies. Many are unlikely to be
paid in full, spreading the economic pain.
When it filed for bankruptcy, Sharper Image owed $6.6 million to
United
Parcel Service. The furniture chain Levitz owed Sealy $1.4 million.
And it is not just large companies that are absorbing the losses. When
Domain, the furniture retailer, filed for bankruptcy, it owed On Time Express, a
90-employee transportation and logistics company in Tempe, Ariz., about $30,000.
“We’ll be lucky to see pennies on the dollar, if we see anything,” said Ross
Musil, the chief financial officer of On Time Express. “It’s a big loss.”
Most of the ailing companies have filed for reorganization, not liquidation,
under the bankruptcy laws, including the furniture chain Wickes, the housewares
seller Fortunoff,
Harvey
Electronics and the catalog retailer
Lillian
Vernon. But, in a contrast with previous recessions, many are unlikely to
emerge from bankruptcy, lawyers and industry experts said.
Changes in the federal bankruptcy code in 2005 significantly tightened
deadlines for ailing companies to restructure their businesses, offering them
less leeway.
And the changes may force companies to pay suppliers before paying wages or
honoring obligations to customers, like redeeming gift cards, said Sally Henry,
a partner in the bankruptcy law practice at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom and the author of several books on bankruptcy.
As a result, she said, “it’s no longer reorganization or even liquidation for
these companies. In many cases, it’s evaporation.”
Several of the retailers that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection over
the last eight months, like the furniture sellers Bombay, Levitz and Domain,
have begun to wind down — closing stores, laying off workers and liquidating
merchandise.
In most cases, the collapses stemmed from a combination of factors: flawed
business strategies, a souring economy and banks’ unwillingness to issue cheap
loans.
Bombay, a chain with 360 stores, was considered a success in the furniture
world, after its sales surged from $393 million in 1999 to $596 million in 2003.
Then the chain decided to move most of its stores out of enclosed malls into
open-air shopping centers. It started a children’s furniture business, called
BombayKids. And it started carrying bigger items, like beds and upholstered
couches, with higher prices than its regular furniture.
Consumers balked at the changes, hurting Bombay’s sales and profits at the
same time that its expenses for the ambitious new strategies began to grow. The
timing was unenviable: By early 2007, the housing market began to falter, so
purchases of furniture slowed to a trickle.
The company was running out of money, but banks refused to lend more. “They
did not want to take the chance that we might not repay the loans,” Elaine D.
Crowley, the chief financial officer, said in an interview.
In September 2007, Bombay filed for bankruptcy protection. The highest bid
for the company came from liquidation firms, who quickly dismembered the
33-year-old chain. Bombay, which once employed 3,608, now has 20 employees left.
“It is very difficult and sad,” Ms. Crowley said.
The bankruptcies are putting a spotlight on a little-discussed facet of
retailing: heavy debt.
Stores may appear to mint money by paying $2 for a T-shirt and charging $10
for it. But because shopping is based on weather patterns and fashion trends,
retailers must pay for merchandise that may sit, unsold, on shelves for long
periods.
So chains regularly borrow large sums to cover routine expenses, like wages
and electricity bills. When sales are strong, as they typically are during the
holiday season, the debts are repaid.
Fortunoff, a jewelry and home furnishing chain in the Northeast, relied on
$90 million in loans to help operate its 23 stores, using merchandise as
collateral.
But by early 2008, as the housing market struggled, the chain’s profits
dropped, meaning its collateral was losing value and the amount it could borrow
fell.
In better economic times, the banks might have granted Fortunoff a reprieve.
But with a recession looming, they refused, forcing it to file for bankruptcy in
February. In filings, the chain said it was “facing a liquidity crisis.”
(Fortunoff was later sold to the owner of Lord & Taylor.)
Plenty of retailers remain on strong footing. Arnold H. Aronson, the former
chief executive of Saks Fifth Avenue and a managing director at Kurt Salmon
Associates, a retail consulting firm, said the credit tightness and consumer
spending slowdown have only wiped out the “bottom tier” companies in
retailing.
“This recession dealt the final blow to these chains,” he said. But several
big-name chains are looking vulnerable. Linens ’n Things, which is owned by
Apollo Management, a private equity firm, is considering a bankruptcy filing
after years of poor performance and mounting debts, though it has additional
options, people involved in the discussions said Monday.
Whether more chains file for bankruptcy or not, it will be hard to miss the
impact of the industry’s troubles in the nation’s malls.
J.
C. Penney, Lowe’s and
Office
Depot are scaling back or delaying expansion. Office Depot had planned to
open 150 stores this year; now it will open 75.
The International Council of Shopping Centers, a trade group, estimates there
will be 5,770 store closings in 2008, up 25 percent from 2007, when there were
4,603.
Charming
Shoppes, which owns the women’s clothing retailers Lane Bryant and Fashion
Bug, is closing at least 150 stores. Wilsons the Leather Experts will close 158.
And Pacific Sunwear is shutting a 153-store chain called Demo.
Those decisions were made months ago, when it was unclear how long the
downturn in consumer spending might last. If March was any indication, it is
nowhere near over. Sales at stores open at least a year fell 0.5 percent, the
worst performance in 13 years, according to the shopping council.