Profile
Photos
Comments
Now, I've been following these cases for some time, prior to all this being aired on Hannity a few weeks ago. Before anyone states this is all bogus, I blog with one of the attorneys, Paul Andrew Mitchell, in a yahoo forum and he keeps us updated daily on his case. Paul Andrew Mitchell has intervened in Berg vs. Obama and added to the lawsuit. See article link below: Berg | | | |
October 26, 2008 Joan Swirsky
Last week, during the crucial waning days of the presidential
campaign, Obama left for Hawaii to visit his 85-year-old grandmother,
Madelyn Dunham, who had broken her hip. In such bad shape was she - in
spite of the hospital's sending her home to heal - that Obama told
ABC's Robin Roberts, that "I'm still not sure whether she makes it to
Election Day."
Filling in for Obama on the campaign trail in Ohio was his wife, Michelle, who told the crowd that granny was doing just fine.
Did Obama have a dual purpose in traveling to Hawaii, the other being
to magically produce the birth certificate proving his eligibility to
be president? While he's now back on the campaign trail, he has still
failed to produce said certificate!
After a recent article I wrote, My Mother's Birth Certicate - And Obama's,
a number of people e-mailed me with FactCheck.org's "proof" of the
certificate. But let's not forget that FactCheck is owned by the
Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that gave millions of dollars
to Obama and his unrepentant terrorist pal William Ayers for an
"education" project. To me, that makes FactCheck ipso facto the least
credible source of factual information.
Infinitely more credible is the research done by, among others, Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg (ObamaCrimes), Chicago journalist Andy Martin, ContrarianCommentaryBlog and author Jerome Corsi (The Obama Nation),
who have cast persuasive, data-provided doubt not only that the birth
certificate(s) so far produced were blatant forgeries, but that Obama -
and his leftwing media lapdogs - have been concealing the fact that he
was born in a hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, a birth his Kenyan
grandmother is on record saying she and Obama's half-brother and
half-sister attended.
What else has Obama failed to provide to a public - and an electorate -
that deserves to know everything possible about a presidential
candidate?
No wonder Obama's critics have called him a Manuchurian Candidate, a
Trojan Horse, and a stealth candidate! If he has nothing to hide, why
on earth is he still be refusing to come clean with the American
people? Answer: he clearly has a lot to hide.
THE BERG CASE
In August, Mr. Berg lodged a suit against Obama and the Democratic National Committee.
On October 4, the accused parties filed a Motion to Dismiss.
On October 21, Mr. Berg released the result of his investigation -
"Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama" - in which he
said that by failing to answer the questions the lawsuit posed, both
Obama and the DNC admitted, by default, that the charges were true.
On October 24, U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick threw out Berg's
suit, which asked that Obama's name be removed from the November 4
ballot and claimed that if Obama were permitted to run for president
and subsequently found to be ineligible, he (Berg) and other voters
would be disenfranchised. The judge concluded that Berg's allegations
were "too vague and too attenuated."
On October 25, Berg announced in a press release that he is immediately
appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court.
"This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution,
Berg said, "If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if
your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an
individual to be President of the United States - the
Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who
does?"
Berg echoed the outrage reverberating throughout the nation at the
prospect of Obama so brazenly flouting the U.S. Constitution, the
provisions of which are very limited for qualifying a person to run
for president: Article II, Section 1: "No
Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States
at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to
the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that
office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and
been fourteen years a resident within the United States."
"For the first time in history," writes journalist Sher
Zieve, "U.S. voters are being asked to choose between continuing the
Republic or bending to the will of a totalitarian Communist candidate."
What will the Supreme Court do? As one e-mailer told me: "The Supreme
Court may be very loathe to take this case, given that they're still
smarting from being accused of `selecting' a president in 2000 and they
won't want to be accused of `deselecting" a president" in 2008."
WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW?
Big hat tip here to Matt Bruce, a retired fire-rescue captain, who provided the following information.
Currently, lawsuits are being filed in nine states - California,
Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and
Washington - that are seeking to require Barack Obama to provide Certification of his Birth in the United
States, or to be removed or to remove himself from state ballots.
Hawaii, the state in which Obama was supposedly born, is seeking
judicial authority to force the certifying or decertifying of Obama's
qualification to run as a candidate for President as a natural born
U.S. citizen. Previously, two lawsuits have failed to force the
certifying documents from Obama.
Every day, new lawsuits are being lodged. For more information about each lawsuit or on how to start your own, contact:
Steve Marquis, noted above, is a Washington State resident who last
Tuesday filed a suit in Washington State Superior Court against Sam
Reed, Secretary of State for the State of Washington, demanding that
Illinois Sen. Barack Obama be removed from the ballot in Washington
unless he can provide verification of his status as a United States
citizen.
Marquis said that by "resolving, one way or another, the unanswered
questions surrounding Obama's citizenship and background would preclude
a constitutional crisis and likely civil unrest which would arise
should information come to light after the election which shows that
the Illinois senator is ineligible to hold the presidency."
Are Obama and the DNC guilty of conspiracy, treason, or sedition? According to Webster's New World College Dictionary:
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
At this 11th-hour in our election cycle, it is imperative for all activists to act!
The following site has information about contacting your elected
representative by phone, fax, and e-mail, as well as extensive
information about contacting the media -print, electronic, TV and
radio. https://www.conservativeusa.org/megalink.htm.
Use the letter below - or your own version - which was written by Frank Salvato, proprietor of https://www.newmedia.us/ and Executive Director of Terrorism Research at the Basics Project (https://www.basicsproject.org/)
literally to blitz your representatives, the media, and the Secretaries
of State in your home state. Use this link to find out who they are:
https://www.e-secretaryofstate.com/.
Remember, this is not partisan! It is to protect the Constitution of
the United States against "enemies both foreign and domestic"!
Dear ____,
Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "No
Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States
at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to
the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that
office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and
been fourteen years a resident within the United States."
There are numerous allegations regarding Sen. Barack Obama's
claim of natural birth in the U.S., all raising suspicion and doubt as
to Obama's actual place of birth and qualification to run for
president.
Some of the assertions to which Obama "admitted" on Philip J. Berg's suit are:
Philip J. Berg's months-long lawsuit in Federal Court in Philadelphia
reached a dramatic plateau as Mr. Obama and the Democratic National
Committee (DNC) failed to respond to the court that Mr. Obama is not a
natural born U.S. Citizen and therefore not qualified to run for office
of President of the U.S. They admitted to Obama's non-qualification by
their failure to respond to a 30-day court ordered discovery in which
Obama and the DNC were ordered to answer a petition by Berg. Mr. Berg
has stated that if the Federal court chooses to dismiss he will appeal
all the way to the Supreme Court. This has come to pass.
These allegations will not go away until Mr. Obama produces proof to
State and federal authorities. If he will not do so voluntarily he must
be compelled by every means available. You, as an employee of The
People, have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution
against ALL enemies foreign and domestic. We The People are demanding
you to make every effort, both public and private, to resolve this
fundamental Constitutional question before Election Day, November 4, 2008.
Sincerely,
[Your Name, Address, and Contact info here]
EXERCISE YOUR PRECIOUS RIGHT TO VOTE
Despite the threat that Obama and his supporters have leveled at the
United States Constitution, we as voters have a fail-safe solution. If
Obama continues to refuse to produce an authentic birth certificate,
then we voters - on November 4th - can come out by the millions upon millions to end his candidacy simply by voting NO to Obama and Yes to McCain-Palin!
Then we can work to get him out of the Senate!
Joan Swirsky (https://www.joanswirsky.com/) is a New York-based journalist and author who can be reached at
joansharon@aol.com
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.jonchristianryter.com/News_Folder/Behind.html
NEWS
ALERT!
Surrick
rules citizens have no standing
to file lawsuits questioning the qualifications
of presidential candidates
Attorney Philip J. Berg is appealing
the arbitrary decision of Bill Clinton-appointed US District Court
Judge R. Barclay Surrick who ruled that Berg did not have
standing to sue Obama. Generally important decisions that government
officials want buried until they become "old news" are made
on what is traditionally viewed as "newsless Friday" when reporters
are paying more attention to the weekend than what news stories might
be breaking, leaving second-string newspapers and local TV stations to
break stories that drift off into media limbo and never resurface for
prime time viewing because the mainstream media then considers the story
to be "old news."
In announcing that he was
"...totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and,
for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the
US Supreme Court. This is a question," Berg said, "of
what has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing;
if you don't have standing' if your neighbor doesn't have standing to
question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United
States—the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world—then
who does? The media initially reported that Berg was going to appeal
Surrick's decision to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals and, if he lost
there, to the US Supreme Court. Berg, however, has decided to bypass the
appellate court and file his appeal directly to the US Supreme Court.
"Anyone," Berg continued, "can
claim to be eligible for Congress or the presidency without having their
legal status, age or citizenship questioned. According to Judge Surrick,
we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under
the US Constitution. What happened to '...government of the people, by
the people, for the people?"
In his 34-page decision,
Surrick ruled that Berg lacked legal standing to bring the
case, adding that "...ordinary citizens can't sue to ensure that
a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements
of the office." Surrick said that was the job of Congress,
saying that the legislature alone possessed the constitutional authority
to determine if a candidate meets the constitutional requirements of the
office he or she is seeking. Surrick added that Congress possessed
the right to defer that authority to "...citizens, voters, or
party members," but it would take a new law to confer that authority
on ordinary citizens. "Until that time," the judge concluded,
"voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that
Plaintiff attempts to bring...Plaintiff would have us derail the democratic
process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted,
and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly
contested presidential primaries in living memory."
Did Obama have a dual purpose in traveling to Hawaii, the other being
to magically produce the birth certificate proving his eligibility to
be president? While he's now back on the campaign trail, he has still
failed to produce said certificate!
After a recent article I wrote, My Mother's Birth Certicate - And Obama's,
a number of people e-mailed me with FactCheck.org's "proof" of the
certificate. But let's not forget that FactCheck is owned by the
Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that gave millions of dollars
to Obama and his unrepentant terrorist pal William Ayers for an
"education" project. To me, that makes FactCheck ipso facto the least
credible source of factual information.
Infinitely more credible is the research done by, among others, Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg (ObamaCrimes), Chicago journalist Andy Martin, ContrarianCommentaryBlog and author Jerome Corsi (The Obama Nation),
who have cast persuasive, data-provided doubt not only that the birth
certificate(s) so far produced were blatant forgeries, but that Obama -
and his leftwing media lapdogs - have been concealing the fact that he
was born in a hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, a birth his Kenyan
grandmother is on record saying she and Obama's half-brother and
half-sister attended.
What else has Obama failed to provide to a public - and an electorate -
that deserves to know everything possible about a presidential
candidate?
- Occidental College records - not released.
- Columbia Thesis paper - not available, locked down by faculty.
- Harvard College records - not released, locked down by faculty.
- Selective Service Registration - not released.
- Medical records - not released (only a one-page report).
- Illinois State Senate schedule - 'not available.'
- Law practice client list - not released.
- Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - not released.
- Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth - not released.
- Harvard Law Review articles published - None.
- University of Chicago scholarly articles - None.
- Record of Baptism-- Not released or 'not available.'
- Illinois State Senate records--'not available.'
No wonder Obama's critics have called him a Manuchurian Candidate, a
Trojan Horse, and a stealth candidate! If he has nothing to hide, why
on earth is he still be refusing to come clean with the American
people? Answer: he clearly has a lot to hide.
THE BERG CASE
In August, Mr. Berg lodged a suit against Obama and the Democratic National Committee.
On October 4, the accused parties filed a Motion to Dismiss.
On October 21, Mr. Berg released the result of his investigation -
"Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama" - in which he
said that by failing to answer the questions the lawsuit posed, both
Obama and the DNC admitted, by default, that the charges were true.
On October 24, U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick threw out Berg's
suit, which asked that Obama's name be removed from the November 4
ballot and claimed that if Obama were permitted to run for president
and subsequently found to be ineligible, he (Berg) and other voters
would be disenfranchised. The judge concluded that Berg's allegations
were "too vague and too attenuated."
On October 25, Berg announced in a press release that he is immediately
appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court.
"This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution,
Berg said, "If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if
your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an
individual to be President of the United States - the
Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who
does?"
Berg echoed the outrage reverberating throughout the nation at the
prospect of Obama so brazenly flouting the U.S. Constitution, the
provisions of which are very limited for qualifying a person to run
for president: Article II, Section 1: "No
Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States
at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to
the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that
office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and
been fourteen years a resident within the United States."
"For the first time in history," writes journalist Sher
Zieve, "U.S. voters are being asked to choose between continuing the
Republic or bending to the will of a totalitarian Communist candidate."
What will the Supreme Court do? As one e-mailer told me: "The Supreme
Court may be very loathe to take this case, given that they're still
smarting from being accused of `selecting' a president in 2000 and they
won't want to be accused of `deselecting" a president" in 2008."
WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW?
Big hat tip here to Matt Bruce, a retired fire-rescue captain, who provided the following information.
Currently, lawsuits are being filed in nine states - California,
Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and
Washington - that are seeking to require Barack Obama to provide Certification of his Birth in the United
States, or to be removed or to remove himself from state ballots.
Hawaii, the state in which Obama was supposedly born, is seeking
judicial authority to force the certifying or decertifying of Obama's
qualification to run as a candidate for President as a natural born
U.S. citizen. Previously, two lawsuits have failed to force the
certifying documents from Obama.
Every day, new lawsuits are being lodged. For more information about each lawsuit or on how to start your own, contact:
- Hawaii: Andy Martin:
AndyMart20@aol.com
. - WA: Steve Marquis:
peoplesvoice@peoplespassions.org
(website:https://www.peoplespassion.org/)..- CA: David Archbold: darchbo1@gmail. com.
- GA: Tom Terr:
kingdommatters@gmail.com
- PA: Philip Berg: philjberg@obamacrim es.com; website https://www.obamacrimes.com/.
- NY: Dan Smith:
Dansmith1954@aol.com
- CT: Cort Wrotnowsk: Metaqubit@aol
Steve Marquis, noted above, is a Washington State resident who last
Tuesday filed a suit in Washington State Superior Court against Sam
Reed, Secretary of State for the State of Washington, demanding that
Illinois Sen. Barack Obama be removed from the ballot in Washington
unless he can provide verification of his status as a United States
citizen.
Marquis said that by "resolving, one way or another, the unanswered
questions surrounding Obama's citizenship and background would preclude
a constitutional crisis and likely civil unrest which would arise
should information come to light after the election which shows that
the Illinois senator is ineligible to hold the presidency."
Are Obama and the DNC guilty of conspiracy, treason, or sedition? According to Webster's New World College Dictionary:
- Conspiracy: Planning and acting together secretly, esp. for an unlawful or harmful purpose, such as murder or treason.
- Treason:
Violation of the allegiance owed to one's sovereign or state; betrayal
of one's country, specifically, in the U.S. (as declared in the
Constitution), consisting only in levying war against the U.S. or in
giving aid and comfort to its enemies. - Sedition: The stirring up of discontent, resistance, or rebellion against the government in power.
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
At this 11th-hour in our election cycle, it is imperative for all activists to act!
The following site has information about contacting your elected
representative by phone, fax, and e-mail, as well as extensive
information about contacting the media -print, electronic, TV and
radio. https://www.conservativeusa.org/megalink.htm.
Use the letter below - or your own version - which was written by Frank Salvato, proprietor of https://www.newmedia.us/ and Executive Director of Terrorism Research at the Basics Project (https://www.basicsproject.org/)
literally to blitz your representatives, the media, and the Secretaries
of State in your home state. Use this link to find out who they are:
https://www.e-secretaryofstate.com/.
Remember, this is not partisan! It is to protect the Constitution of
the United States against "enemies both foreign and domestic"!
Dear ____,
Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "No
Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States
at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to
the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that
office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and
been fourteen years a resident within the United States."
There are numerous allegations regarding Sen. Barack Obama's
claim of natural birth in the U.S., all raising suspicion and doubt as
to Obama's actual place of birth and qualification to run for
president.
Some of the assertions to which Obama "admitted" on Philip J. Berg's suit are:
- He was born in Mombassa, Kenya in 1961 while his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was married to Barack Obama Sr., a Kenyan.
- When
his mother, divorced from Obama Sr., moved to Indonesia and married
Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, Obama was adopted by Soetoro and became an
Indonesian citizen. - While in Indonesia, Obama had his name changed to Barry Soetoro.
- Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 under an Indonesian passport, when Pakistan was a no-travel zone for Americans.
- Obama's Kenyan grandmother is alleged to have claimed that Obama was born in Kenya and she was present at the birth.
- Muammar Gadhafi, leader of Libya, has publicly claimed that Obama was born in Kenya and studied in Muslim schools in Indonesia.
- Obama has also admitted on his website to hold citizenship in another country (the U.S. Constitution forbids dual citizenship).
- A lawsuit in Honolulu in the First District Court is seeking a court-order to open Obama's secret birth records.
- Obama has thus far neglected a Freedom of Information request for the records at two hospitals in Hawaii.
- Lawsuits
in California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania and Washington are asking state Superior Courts to force
the each state's Secretary of State, as the chief state elections
officer, to perform his or her state constitutional duty to require
original certifying birth records from Mr. Obama that would verify his
birth in Hawaii.
Philip J. Berg's months-long lawsuit in Federal Court in Philadelphia
reached a dramatic plateau as Mr. Obama and the Democratic National
Committee (DNC) failed to respond to the court that Mr. Obama is not a
natural born U.S. Citizen and therefore not qualified to run for office
of President of the U.S. They admitted to Obama's non-qualification by
their failure to respond to a 30-day court ordered discovery in which
Obama and the DNC were ordered to answer a petition by Berg. Mr. Berg
has stated that if the Federal court chooses to dismiss he will appeal
all the way to the Supreme Court. This has come to pass.
These allegations will not go away until Mr. Obama produces proof to
State and federal authorities. If he will not do so voluntarily he must
be compelled by every means available. You, as an employee of The
People, have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution
against ALL enemies foreign and domestic. We The People are demanding
you to make every effort, both public and private, to resolve this
fundamental Constitutional question before Election Day, November 4, 2008.
Sincerely,
[Your Name, Address, and Contact info here]
EXERCISE YOUR PRECIOUS RIGHT TO VOTE
Despite the threat that Obama and his supporters have leveled at the
United States Constitution, we as voters have a fail-safe solution. If
Obama continues to refuse to produce an authentic birth certificate,
then we voters - on November 4th - can come out by the millions upon millions to end his candidacy simply by voting NO to Obama and Yes to McCain-Palin!
Then we can work to get him out of the Senate!
Joan Swirsky (https://www.joanswirsky.com/) is a New York-based journalist and author who can be reached at
joansharon@aol.com
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.jonchristianryter.com/News_Folder/Behind.html
NEWS
ALERT!
Surrick
rules citizens have no standing
to file lawsuits questioning the qualifications
of presidential candidates
Attorney Philip J. Berg is appealing
the arbitrary decision of Bill Clinton-appointed US District Court
Judge R. Barclay Surrick who ruled that Berg did not have
standing to sue Obama. Generally important decisions that government
officials want buried until they become "old news" are made
on what is traditionally viewed as "newsless Friday" when reporters
are paying more attention to the weekend than what news stories might
be breaking, leaving second-string newspapers and local TV stations to
break stories that drift off into media limbo and never resurface for
prime time viewing because the mainstream media then considers the story
to be "old news."
In announcing that he was
"...totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and,
for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the
US Supreme Court. This is a question," Berg said, "of
what has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing;
if you don't have standing' if your neighbor doesn't have standing to
question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United
States—the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world—then
who does? The media initially reported that Berg was going to appeal
Surrick's decision to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals and, if he lost
there, to the US Supreme Court. Berg, however, has decided to bypass the
appellate court and file his appeal directly to the US Supreme Court.
"Anyone," Berg continued, "can
claim to be eligible for Congress or the presidency without having their
legal status, age or citizenship questioned. According to Judge Surrick,
we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under
the US Constitution. What happened to '...government of the people, by
the people, for the people?"
In his 34-page decision,
Surrick ruled that Berg lacked legal standing to bring the
case, adding that "...ordinary citizens can't sue to ensure that
a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements
of the office." Surrick said that was the job of Congress,
saying that the legislature alone possessed the constitutional authority
to determine if a candidate meets the constitutional requirements of the
office he or she is seeking. Surrick added that Congress possessed
the right to defer that authority to "...citizens, voters, or
party members," but it would take a new law to confer that authority
on ordinary citizens. "Until that time," the judge concluded,
"voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that
Plaintiff attempts to bring...Plaintiff would have us derail the democratic
process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted,
and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly
contested presidential primaries in living memory."