Laura

Profile

Username:
whereabouts
Name:
Laura
Location:
Lockport, IL
Birthday:
02/26
Status:
Single

Stats

Post Reads:
156,457
Posts:
899
Photos:
18
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

9 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Politics, Astrophysics, Missing

Education > Human DNA Discoveries Piling Up
 

Human DNA Discoveries Piling Up


Human DNA Discoveries Piling Up


Malcolm Ritter, Associated Press



































The Gene Factor

The Gene Factor



 




March 31, 2008 -- Scientists are scanning human DNA with a
precision and scope once unthinkable and rapidly finding genes linked to cancer,
arthritis, diabetes and other diseases.
It's a payoff from a landmark achievement completed five years ago -- the identification of all the building blocks in the human DNA.
Follow-up research and leaps in DNA-scanning technology have opened the door to
a flood of new reports about genetic links to disease.
On a single day in February, for example, three separate research groups
reported finding several genetic variants tied to the risk of getting prostate
cancer.
And over the past year or so, scientists have reported similar results for
conditions ranging from heart attack to multiple sclerosis to gallstones. The
list even includes restless legs syndrome, a twitching condition best known as
"jimmy legs" in an episode of "Seinfeld."
Interviews with scientists at the center of this revolution and a review of
published studies over the past six months make clear the rapid adoption of the
new technology and the high expectations for it.
Since 2005, studies with the gene-scanning technique have linked nearly 100 DNA variants to
as many as 40 common diseases and traits, scientists noted this month in the
Journal of the American Medical Association.
"There have been few, if any, similar bursts of discovery in the history of
medical research," two Harvard researchers declared last summer in the New
England Journal of Medicine.

What does all this excitement mean for ordinary people? Not so much just yet.
Simply finding the genes that can raise the risk of an illness doesn't mean you
can prevent the disease.
But there have been some payoffs already.
One involves a leading cause of blindness in older people, age-related
macular degeneration. A series of genome-wide scans, the most recent in 2005,
"led to huge breakthroughs in understanding" that disease, said Stephen Daiger,
a Houston scientist.
When scientists implicated a particular gene that's involved in a system of
disease-fighting proteins in the blood, it gave scientists a
"slap-on-the-forehead kind of insight...into the biology of what's going on,"
said Daiger, a vision genetics expert at the University of Texas Health Sciences
Center.
That galvanized research into the disease. And at least one new drug is being
tested in patients now.
What's made this and other hopeful findings possible is the "genome-wide
association study," which lets scientists scan the entire complement of DNA from
thousands of people in unprecedented detail. While the basic technique is not
new, its popularity has exploded recently because of cost-cutting advances in
technology and discoveries about the genome.
"It lets you go searching for that needle in the haystack," says Michael
Watson, executive director of the American College of Medical Genetics.
It's a big haystack. DNA is made up of long sequences of building
blocks, sort of like sentences composed from a four-letter alphabet: A, C, G and
T. The human genome contains about 3 billion letters, about as many as the total
number of letters and digits in more than 100 Manhattan phone books.
Scientists have identified the order of the letters in the human genome, a
feat the government declared accomplished in 2003. But of course, different
people have slightly different DNA sequences. People commonly differ in what
letter they have at about 10 million positions along the full genome. Some folks
may have a T where most people have a C, for example.
And those single-letter variations are key to the genome-wide scans.
Basically, scientists compare DNA from a large number of people, some sick with
a particular disease, and others healthy. They can look at a half-million or
more positions to see what letter appears. If sick people tend to show a
different result than healthy ones -- say, if they tend to have a T in some spot
more often than healthy people do -- it's a red flag.

It suggests that some genetic influence on the risk of that disease comes
from that spot or nearby. So it gives scientists a specific place to look more
closely for a disease-promoting gene.
In practice, genome scans can be big undertakings.
Scientists in Iowa and Denmark are searching blood samples from 7,000 babies
and new mothers in the United States and Denmark for genetic variations that
raise the risk for premature birth.
DNA will be extracted, and early this summer, more than half a million spots
on the microscopic strands from each mother and baby will be assessed for clues
to where the genetic variations may lie.
The DNA will be analyzed at the Center for Inherited Disease Research at Johns Hopkins
University in Baltimore. Robots will put a tiny drop of DNA-bearing solution
from each person onto a clear glass slide roughly the size of a business card,
with four drops per slide.
The lab's DNA scanners, blue boxes each about twice as big as a desktop
printer, will reveal what DNA "letter" appears in more than 580,000 spots in the
genetic material, said lab director Kimberly Doheny.
This scan takes about half an hour per sample. Once the results are
available, the scientists will use statistical tests to find the telltale signs
of a possible gene affecting risk of premature birth. They'll double-check to
make sure any such signal shows up in more than one population.
Even five years ago, such a detailed examination of DNA from so many people
would have been inconceivable.
Genome scans offer some major advantages over previous gene-hunting
techniques. Scientists don't have to start by guessing what genes might be
involved in a disease, or confine themselves to families where a tendency to an
illness is inherited.
And the genome-scan approach reveals genes with only subtle influence on the
risk of getting sick, too slight to be found by earlier methods. That's just the
kind of gene that plays a role in common illnesses like heart disease.
Even if its impact on risk is small, a newly found gene can be a bonanza to
scientists if it reveals something new about the biology of a disease. That in
turn can give hints for finding new treatments.
For non-scientists, the most direct payoff of finding new disease genes may
be in devising tests to identify people at elevated risk for a particular
disorder.
Most genetic variants found in the genome scans boost a person's risk by
around 50 percent. If the disease risk is fairly low, that's "not something
you'd lose much sleep over," Watson said.
More useful, he said, is the notion of finding variants in maybe a half-dozen
genes that affect the risk for a disease, then testing a person for all of them
at once to come up with a more powerful indicator.


Related Links:
National Human Genome Research
Institute

Center for Inherited
Disease Research

Gene-Scanning
Technique

posted on Mar 31, 2008 10:16 AM ()

Comment on this article   


899 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]