Laura

Profile

Username:
whereabouts
Name:
Laura
Location:
Lockport, IL
Birthday:
02/26
Status:
Single

Stats

Post Reads:
156,480
Posts:
899
Photos:
18
Last Online:
> 30 days ago
View All »

My Friends

10 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago
> 30 days ago

Subscribe

Politics, Astrophysics, Missing

Money & Finance > America's Second Biggest Bank Failure
 

America's Second Biggest Bank Failure

America's Second Biggest Bank Failure
Late Friday afternoon (July 11th) federal regulators swooped in on
California-based IndyMac Bank and closed its doors. With $32 billion in
assets, it is according to The Los Angeles Times the second largest bank failure in US history. IndyMac will re-open its doors on Monday morning as a ward of the FDIC.
Some background will be helpful to put this bank failure into
perspective. IndyMac is ground-zero of the sub-prime crisis and the
poster-child of imprudent lending. Founded in 1985 by Countrywide Bank,
whose own recent failure was masked by its acquisition by Bank of
America, IndyMac pioneered the issuance of so-called Alt-A mortgages to
borrowers who do not fully document their income or assets, which
typically means borrowers with blemished credit histories or real
estate speculators looking to 'flip' houses during the bubble years.
Alt-A mortgages were considered to be less risky than the subprime
loans which started the current financial crisis last year, so
IndyMac's plight may cause everyone to re-think that credit quality
fairy tale.
IndyMac sold most of the loans it originated, but it also drank its
own poison by holding some of these loans on its books, which is the
important point. The liquidation value of IndyMac's assets may be
instructive to help us understand what lies ahead for the unfolding
financial crisis. By applying IndyMac's experience to the value of the
questionable mortgage assets still within the global banking system, we
can begin to understand the scope and magnitude of the problem.
IndyMac's $32 billion in assets are funded by $19 billion of
deposits, with funding for the $13 billion balance having been provided
primarily by debt and a little equity. About $1 billion of deposits are
above the insured limit, so the FDIC is insuring about $18 billion of
deposits, but here is the interesting - and scary - stuff. The FDIC
press release states: "Based on preliminary analysis, the estimated
cost of the resolution to the Deposit Insurance Fund is between $4 and
$8 billion."

Think about this statement for a moment. After liquidating the
bank's assets, not only will IndyMac shareholders and holders of
IndyMac debt be wiped out, the FDIC's insurance fund will still take a "$4 and $8 billion" hit so that the $18 billion of insured deposits in IndyMac are made whole. So let's do a little math here.
After liquidating $32 billion in assets, the FDIC still has to add
some $4 billion to $8 billion more to make sure $18 billion of deposits
are made whole. So in the worst case scenario, the liquidation value of
IndyMac's $32 billion of assets is $10 billion, or in other words, the true market value of IndyMac's assets is only 31% of their stated book value.
In the FDIC's best case scenario, the liquidation value of IndyMac's
$32 billion of assets is $14 billion, which is still only 44% of their
stated book value.
So here is the all-important question. Can we infer from this
liquidation analysis of IndyMac that the true value of sub-prime and
Alt-A mortgage debt still in the banking system is something less than
50% of stated book value?
I don't have the answer to that question. If anybody does, it is the
bankers themselves, and they aren't talking. They do not want to
disclose how bad off they remain, even after already writing off more
than $300 billion of assets globally (as reported by London's Financial Times). They no doubt must be panicked about what's yet to come.
So how big is the potential problem? My guess is that even bankers
really don't know the answer to that question, but there are some
estimates worth considering.
Investment guru John Paulson had his hedge-fund correctly positioned
to benefit from the sub-prime meltdown, so given this record, his
estimates of the problem are probably better than most. According to
the Bloomberg he says that "global writedowns and losses from the credit crisis may reach US$1.3 trillion." That estimate seems reasonable in view of the IndyMac experience, given
that at least $3 trillion of inferior loans probably remain on bank
books at present. Keep in mind too that the amount of inferior loans
will grow as economic conditions continue to weaken.
All of this does not bode well for the dollar. The federal
government is readying the printing press to create even more dollars
to plug the black-hole on bank balance sheets, but there is another
black-hole that they need to begin worrying about.
The FDIC deposit fund only has $53 billion of assets, and around 10%
or perhaps more of that is now going to be used to bail-out IndyMac. So
how safe is the FDIC? How safe is the dollar, or more to the point, how
safe is your wealth held in dollars? Not very.
Even putting aside the subprime financial problems yet to come and
the countless dollars the federal government will be creating in the
future to bail-out other IndyMacs when they hit the wall, consider how
rapidly the dollar is already being debased. For example, a 1-year
T-bill pays about 2.2% interest, but the CPI is rising at 4.2%. Thus,
in one year you have lost 2% of your purchasing power, but probably
even more because the true rate of inflation is much higher than 4.2%
(John Williams of ShadowStats estimates the rate of inflation is over
10%).
In contrast to this loss of purchasing power from holding dollars, gold has risen seven years in a row at an annualized average rate of 17.4%. This year gold is already up 14.9%, and silver is doing even better. It has risen 26.7% so far this year.
Given that inflation is becoming worse by the day as crude oil and
other commodities climb higher and given that the Federal Reserve is
not raising dollar interest rates to fight inflation and save the
dollar from a collapse, it is safe to expect more of the same from gold
(appreciation) and the dollar (depreciation). The following chart shows
that the dollar remains perched on the edge of the precipice, as
discussed in my previous alert.

The dollar is sitting on the bottom trendline of its recent uptrend
channel, threatening to fall into the abyss. Avoid the dollar. Own gold
and silver instead.


Published by GoldMoney
Copyright © 2008. All rights reserved.
Edited by James Turk, alert@goldmoney.com

This material is prepared for
general circulation and may not have regard to the particular
circumstances or needs of any specific person who reads it. The
information contained in this report has been compiled from sources
believed to be reliable, but no representations or warranty, express or
implied, is made by GoldMoney, its affiliates, representatives or any
other person as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All
opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect the writer's
judgement as of the date of this report, are subject to change without
notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility.
To the full extent permitted by law neither GoldMoney nor any of its
affiliates, representatives, nor any other person, accepts any
liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential loss
arising from any use of this report or the information contained
herein. This report may not be reproduced, distributed or published
without the prior consent of GoldMoney.

posted on July 13, 2008 10:49 AM ()

Comment on this article   


899 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]